John or Arthur, Zig Forums?

John or Arthur, Zig Forums?

Attached: 5F36B62B-115B-49F9-9D24-CE9DCAA2D8C8.jpg (554x554, 23.57K)

John

Rdr1 John

Cormano

Attached: 1570719183415.jpg (473x300, 17.3K)

it's literally the same character

Hitler

Arthur. John is good in RDR1 but feels weird in RDR2. Almost autistic

Attached: Red Dead Redemption 2_20200604191324.jpg (1920x1080, 283.24K)

Post kino screenshots.

Attached: 624.jpg (3840x2160, 588.69K)

Both are equally good.

I prefer John's voice and character design and i like that he is a family man, makes him stand out a little bit compared to Arthur who is very generic for the majority of RDR2 until the redemption arc.

Does rdr2 run well on PC if you have a really strong computer?

I prefer playing as Arthur, but John has a much, much better plot. The things that happen to Arthur are so boring and meaningless that he has to dedicate his life to helping John.

it's horribly optimized. i get 60fps on around medium/high settings i have: ryzen 5 3600, geforce rtx 2060, 32gb ram 3000mhz
Ok here

Attached: Screenshot_2.png (264x459, 45.24K)

wrong picture fuck

Attached: Screenshot_1.png (1208x677, 1.81M)

Arthur but I like both

RDR1 John.

Arthur has a great voice actor, and is fun in secondary missions and when you're fucking around with npcs.
in the main story he acts like dutch's pet and shows no balls even when he's left for dead.

Handsome mustache Arthur

Attached: 001aabf14622c88bff9a76d8ccf61f28.jpg (540x550, 41.71K)

he was with dutch since he was 14, iys realistic writing that he dick rides him

I have i5 8gen, rtx 2060, 16gb ram and get 60fps on ultra

Rockstars mission structure doesn’t help Arthurs story at all.

After awhile it just makes Arthur seem like is IQ is 40

John

Attached: 8fa59jw4myx21.jpg (1920x1080, 373.94K)

Based

Attached: Revolver Morgan.jpg (700x1037, 508.65K)

I’ve been playing RDR 1 for the first time recently and John just seems like an idiot trying to play both sides in Mexico

And every mission is help me and I’ll help you type shit but no one ever really helps Marston

Did we play the same game? I had volumetrics set to medium, textures set to ultra and everything else set to high and got 60+ FPS at all times.

Attached: speccy.png (553x433, 21.14K)

Why do both John and Arthur feel so real, fleshed out, likable, and believable? Does Rockstar truly have the best writers in the industry?

Rockstar has two teams. The GTA team and the "everything else we touch" team.

The GTA team has the best programmers. The other team innovates, the other team pushes graphics to insane degrees, the other team writes compelling stories.

The GTA team makes fun, mindless games. The other team gets paid to work suicidal hours while their bosses drop acid and scream insane demands at them that they must implement perfectly within weeks.

The GTA team rolls in the cash in the short term and then turns into jews. The other team slowly becomes millionaires that can say they worked on some of the best gaming experiences around.

Put me in the screenshot, reddit niggers.

Those look the same are they the same guy named john arthur or something

rdr1 john >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>arhur>>>rdr2 john

Dude’s really good at writing and drawing for an uneducated orphan

Red Harlow

Patrician taste and we'll never see him again

he is autistic, dumb even, mistaking berries for babies, dumbfuck

Both are relentlessly handsome. I want to kiss them both relentlessly.

Why does john look like Arthur in the epilogue

YOU EAT BABIES

I like John a lot more because he's in a better game, with better characters, and a better plot

Because they have fucked it up in later patches

Both white boy

Attached: IMG_20200705_080743652.jpg (3264x2448, 2.41M)

biggest beard arthur > modest beard john = RDR1 john > beardless arthur