In a world of nuclear arms and nation wide technological security vulnerabilities, the Thucydides trap has never been as risky as it is today. As China threatens hegemony and naval supremacy in the West Pacific and Russia pushes influence south into the Middle East and west into Ukraine at the same time as the West pushes in the exact same locations, it’s hard to know who the aggressor is, or whether that even matters. What we can conclude however, is that regardless of the moral ambiguities, major powers continue to wage open war with mercenary armies within the borders of secondary powers all across the Afro-Eurasian continent. The right of conquest dictates economic realities for the great powers, no less than it did 100 years prior, regardless of whether the UN Charter guarantees territorial integrity.
Note that ‘demonstrably’ doesn’t mean ‘true’ or ‘factual’. Instead merely footage of riot police, armed government forces and especially the manner in which Army regulars patrol streets in South East Asia are effective in achieving this. Despite being the norm in these countries, a traffic officer with a slung M16, is more than enough evidence to prove the evil, autocratic nature of the target nation.
An example would be the Rohingyan Muslims in Myanmar (Burma), Sunni
>Target will of course be hostile, or at least neutral to the (((West))) Any attempt to join in trade groups outside of the (((Euro Zone))) is punishable by regime change. Historically Syria, Ukraine and very recently Armenia.
What is normal within target states, traffic cops with M16s, can be construed as morally objectionable for Western audiences. Play their culture against the three (((ideals))) of the West, free market, democracy and egalitarianism.
>The foreign power is not heeding our arbitrary standards, standards which are imposed by (((mass media))) Western moral judgement is obscured by mass media and artificial popular culture, proving even more that the mass judgement of Westerners is worthless and the target country more often than not holds the moral high ground. Concepts such as national and ethnic integrity are seen as evil today.
Examples are Syrian chemical weapons, Syrian Caesar photos, etc. Demonstrably untrue, but pushed via the mass media machine to justify conflict escalation where required.
The audience of mass media are fed on a constant diet of emotional trauma and elation. The media machine is a finely tuned instrument to elicit biochemical reactions on demand. After such exposure viewers have limited attention spans and can only be engaged for a few hours at a time. Therefore the stories must be kept at a slow simmer in the background, so they never forget their existence, only to be brought to the forefront on demand when conflict escalation is needed for victory.
Both are proven CIA fronts, the former operated in Venezuela and Cuba for regime change while the latter operates in Ukraine and was deeply involved in the Euromaiden revolution.
Brainwash them into thinking the supporting agents are their allies and not manipulators. When the revolution succeeds, ensure their economy is hooked on foreign aid and must do as the aid givers please lest they come crashing down only to be replaced again. The CIA did this in Cambodia to rice farmers, paying them in food and cash for opium crops. Once all the farmers had swapped to opium, they were slaves to the CIA who used food shipments as a weapon against them, threatening them with starvation.
These will be highly motivated and well trained professional killers. Use them to infiltrate the ranks of disgruntled citizenry and march with the protesters. They will throw the first rocks at police, burn the first car and fire the first shot. Mob mentality takes over from there, the moment an angry mob sees someone else throw a rock, they’ll join rapidly to turn the protest violent.
As police crack down on (((violent protesters))), exploit this. In Syria and Ukraine, during both (((revolutions))) there were unidentified snipers who opened fire on both police and protesters alike. As police returned fire, protesters saw it as an attack on them who were often in the cross fire (likely on purpose).
Your operatives may now begin arming the populace with black market weapons. They may train select, vetted, individuals who are zealous for the cause. These locals will then go back and coordinate larger groups for the purpose of armed insurrection.
Your plan didn’t go so well? That’s okay, just fake a chemical weapons attack and call it a day.
Ukraine was having a rebolution regardless of western intervention it was a cluster fuck of a country based on geography not ethnicity. Look into the election just before the revolution, almost the entire Russian vote went to one candidate and almost the entire Ukranian vote went to another. The Russian won and Putin put some light pressure on him to draw the Ukraine closer to Brics and eurasia which he did and it was resented and poorly recived by the Ukranians. You guys give the west way to much credit and the countries having revolutions to much credit. They can facilitate the means of a revolt but not fabricate one. It has to be organic to some extent
Thats not going to work anymore, were fighting a genocide and those who refuse to take it seriously and stop voting with niggers can cry CIA nigger all they want, no one is doing anything illegal here and before a revolution comes discussion of a revolution. The niggers in South Africa were talking armed struggle in the 40s, the people doing so today are doing the exact same thing. Breaking the ice.
Not sure what you are on about. Just pointing out the incidental similarity of the two structures.
Connor Taylor
Same thing immediately occured to me user, coincidence?
Jaxson Torres
Oh, I didnt catch that part. The candlesticks.
Ryder Ortiz
This image is applicable to the USA right now. It is at stage 7 from the top. "Intensification of Propaganda, psychological preparation of Population for Rebellion"
Resist.
Colton Miller
bump
Joshua Murphy
No it was because Athens was the federal bank for all the islands and then went and spent everyone's money.
Aggressor is the one who doesn't belong there, in these casrs, USA. It's that easy.
Alexander Lopez
What the fuck are you talking about, nigger?
They recognized that Athens had developed a superior navy and greater regional influence after the persian wars. They expressly forbid Athens from rebuilding its walls, and Athens went fuck you and did it anyways. When slaves began revolting in Sparta, Athens was the only one of the hellenic states to be turned away and when that happened, Athens knew war was inevitable. They allied with Sparta's rivals and thus began the first peloponnesian war.
You are a doubleniggerfaggot and you may never post here again.
Here's a PDF that was translated into English from powerpoint slides that Russian and East European military leaders gave at a large conference. Lots of interesting stuff in it. It outlines in a schematic way how to do a color revolution. Notice that when this conference happened – which the Russians deliberately opened to the public in order to let everyone know what was happening – the Americans tried to cover the doctrine up by saying that it was the Russians themselves doing what was in the doctrinal analyses of color revolutions. This ended up being called "New Generation Warfare" and the "Gerasimov Doctrine" and was shilled to death by liberals and (((neocons))) from Foreign Policy magazine to that deep state naval counterintel idiot on twitter "20 committee". When in fact, Gerasimov was doing an analysis of how the US State Department, CIA, Western NGOs, and JSOC do their color revolutions, covert actions, and so on and have been doing for a number of years. Some links to how it was bullshit can be found here with the original shill saying he'd made it up: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valery_Gerasimov
