Have you completely shed your reactionary views? Which ones do you still cling...

Robert Robinson
Robert Robinson

Have you completely shed your reactionary views? Which ones do you still cling to if you're honest?

Attached: 810.jpg (791.67 KB, 1600x1667)

Ayden Allen
Ayden Allen

That word means nothing.

Wyatt Clark
Wyatt Clark

So all of them?

Bentley Carter
Bentley Carter

haha gotem

Alexander Lewis
Alexander Lewis

depends on what you mean by reactionary?

I mean I'm still a Gnostic Christian Nationalist, and believe women belong in the kitchen but my economic views tell a different tale.

Ethan Clark
Ethan Clark

If I'd deem a view that I hold as reactionary, I wouldn't have it. I think the most "reactionary" view that I have is that I am honestly sceptic of the beliefs that transsexuals hold, and I think a lot of transsexuals are really just transvestites or autogynephilic. When I am encountering a trans person on twitter with a bio that says "lesbian transwoman" I immediately assume that the guy just wanted to bang hot lesbians or generally girls he couldn't score as a dude. Being a "lesbian transwoman" is honestly something that I am extremly sceptical about it, and I don't think this will ever change, sorry to all trans people whon are decent.

Samuel Reyes
Samuel Reyes

And yeah I am gotta get a lot of shit for this but I believe that most trans people would be better off just not trying to change their sex physically, by cutting off their genitals or hormones, and genuinely trying to live as a man/woman that crossdresses privately.

Luis Hughes
Luis Hughes

transgenderism

I'm very skeptical of the narrative being pushed by neoliberals that this is established, settled science and that transgenderism is not a mental illness that they are fostering. I think it also gives into the worst aspects of modern capitalist society: individualism, consumerism and narcissism.

Rather than the "you're on the wrong side of history and future generations will ask how we could be so regressive" i think future generations will be asking how on earth we could think letting a child mutilate their sexual organs and take hormone drugs wasn't utterly insane.

Ethan Ortiz
Ethan Ortiz

This.
It's not reactionary, it's materialist and rational.
Non-radfem gender criticals FTW!

Alexander Campbell
Alexander Campbell

According to me? Not anything I can think of

According to retards? Im appearantly litterally hitler or something.

Joshua Green
Joshua Green

Dealing with the transgender issues by using psychology/psychiatry to get rid of their dysphoria is less invasive and overall better than having them transition.

Jayden Edwards
Jayden Edwards

this.

Lincoln Morales
Lincoln Morales

chan tankies hate trannies
twitter tankies are trannies
Please inflight over this so I don't have to deal with china stans when I try to organize.

Attached: DvIi3PXX4AAx9aP.jpeg (57.09 KB, 442x650)

Zachary Brown
Zachary Brown

If you mean reactionary in the strict "return to prior state" then I guess I like some aspects of primitive or pre-class society like general egalitarianism, a communal "family unit" where everyone knows everyone, and sex being not only not taboo but a sort of positive spiritual thing.

Caleb Nguyen
Caleb Nguyen

and sex being not only not taboo but a sort of positive spiritual thing.
What’s wrong with sex being taboo?

Christopher Taylor
Christopher Taylor

People are inherently sexual and shaming them for a harmless and necessary activity causes psychological distress for no reason whatsoever.

Ryder Howard
Ryder Howard

I legit don't have any. Even the positions I hold that make people here mad come from entirely within a socialist context.

Xavier Flores
Xavier Flores

supposed to be about liberation of working class
instead is about a fraction of the population with a mental illness
they make every issue about themselves

gee why does no one like them?

Matthew Myers
Matthew Myers

People do have some sexual desire, but there’s nothing wrong with keeping this shit private. It’s fucking disgusting having people talk about sex and their sex lives in public. Also hookups are extremely unsanitary, they spread disease. Besides sex should only be for those who a person is deeply intimate with. Society today is over sexualized.

Zachary Brown
Zachary Brown

I utterly despise religion and I wish we could round up all religious people and execute them all. Religions and religious people are literally cancer.

Jose Reyes
Jose Reyes

there’s nothing wrong with keeping this shit private
Private =/= taboo. Nobody thinks you're a bad person for taking a shit. A lot of people think less of a person for having sex.
hookups are extremely unsanitary, they spread disease
So does any social interaction. People are disease vectors. Safe sex is entirely possible.
Besides sex should only be for those who a person is deeply intimate with.
Sex is one of the ways people become intimate with each other, and the only reason hookups make people feel bad afterward is because they've been socialized to think there's something wrong with it. People sometimes make brief connections, sexual or not, and never see each other again. Not every person you interact with should be part of your community/tribe.
Society today is over sexualized.
That's your opinion. A lot of people say the opposite. I say that's a completely shallow analysis. Commercialization and commodification of sex is bad, but that doesn't make sex bad. Sex has been divorced from its biological function as a healthy activity. That's worth having a problem with, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Alexander Kelly
Alexander Kelly

Sex is one of the ways people become intimate with each other, and the only reason hookups make people feel bad afterward is because they've been socialized to think there's something wrong with it. People sometimes make brief connections, sexual or not, and never see each other again. Not every person you interact with should be part of your community/tribe.
Sex is very different from other functions. It’s the action of procreation. As such it should not be done with anyone, for this destroys it’s meaning and purpose.
A lot of people say the opposite.
Are you a thirteen year old boy?

Leo Johnson
Leo Johnson

Sex is very different from other functions. It’s the action of procreation. As such it should not be done with anyone, for this destroys it’s meaning and purpose.
If the meaning and purpose of sex (whatever that specifically means to you) is so fragile then maybe it ought to be destroyed and replaced with something even the slightest bit robust.
Are you a thirteen year old boy?
Are you a post-menopausal woman?

Kayden Reed
Kayden Reed

Sex is very different from other functions. It’s the action of procreation. As such it should not be done with anyone, for this destroys it’s meaning and purpose.
Reducing sex to merely the vehicle of procreation ignores how it actually exists within society and in relationships. I hope you are a teenage virgin if you believe this.

Oliver Perez
Oliver Perez

how is gay sex necessary if it doesn't make the proletarian stronger? it just spreads aids and poop dick.

Liam Evans
Liam Evans

The “sexual revolution” was caused by advertisers using sex to sell shit. It’s pure consumerism. Oversexualization reduces the meaning of sex in intiment relationships. Oversexualization also causes people to pick partners for superficial reasons, instead of on a more deeper emotional level. In effect oversexalization has reduced deep and intimate relationships and made them shallow and superficial. It was a mistake and something to be reversed.

Mason James
Mason James

Oversexualization
Hello incel

Cameron Ortiz
Cameron Ortiz

Sex being shameful or taboo is a christfag meme. Before those repressive cunts forcibly converted people, folk religions basically worshipped sexuality and reproduction.

Samuel Allen
Samuel Allen

TIL gay sex spontaneously generates AIDS

Joshua Lewis
Joshua Lewis

t. used up whore who has STDs

Carson Rogers
Carson Rogers

Sexual taboo is a prerequisite for deep meaningful relationships. When you have sex with everyone, sex has no meaning.

Brody Sanders
Brody Sanders

Jealous possessive love is bourgeois.

Joshua Sanders
Joshua Sanders

Sexual taboo is a prerequisite for deep meaningful relationships.

Attached: super-spooky.jpg (174.71 KB, 514x536)

Elijah Peterson
Elijah Peterson

holy fuck why are all the mentally ill roasties who never form meaningful relationships and instead have casual sex until they die of AIDs on leftpol?

Gabriel Walker
Gabriel Walker

holy fuck why are all the mentally ill roasties
The butthurt incel has arrived
who never form meaningful relationships
Spooked
and instead have casual sex until they die of AIDs
Does having casual sex mean you just fuck anything that walks and never wear protection? Wow today I learned

John Nelson
John Nelson

I get my ideas about sex and relationships from Hollywood and women's magazines

Robert Reed
Robert Reed

dat pic
This is a Hoochie thread, isn't it?

Attached: pretty-princess.png (249.02 KB, 1400x680)

Thomas Myers
Thomas Myers

pic is misleading af

hoochie is way fatter than that

Tyler Johnson
Tyler Johnson

When you find out what the relation between anarchism and free love was in the 1800s, you'll shit bricks, user.
Then there was the new left. Or fourier. Or…

Connor Scott
Connor Scott

not really, besides women cause problems when not under a man's orders. most of the first wave feminists were childless, single harpies.

Attached: 0PleV77uer.jpg (22.38 KB, 270x405)

Luis Davis
Luis Davis

anarchism isn't self-sustainable. free love in the end fucks everyone over.

Logan James
Logan James

Heres you're you.

Juan Anderson
Juan Anderson

that pic
My reactionary hot take is that /left(y)pol/ was better in the past.

Jason Morales
Jason Morales

my reactionary hot take is that left-wing nationalism is based

Isaac Peterson
Isaac Peterson

relation between anarchism and free love was in the 1800s
And it never worked out
Then there was the new left.
Which was the biggest mistake leftists ever did

Zachary Hall
Zachary Hall

I am a bit of a tankie

Attached: 1463952049339-0.jpg (250.98 KB, 708x1048)

Nolan Morales
Nolan Morales

I don't see how any socialist would be against free love as the 19th and early 20th century thinkers discussed it, given that it is the rather inoffensive claim the (bourgeois) state should not regulate marriage and relationships should be entered into and exited willingly. Guess enforced monogamy is a good thing for the spooked nobooks around here.

Attached: 7c498b1de5823462126de023e8ab880feec455e0.jpg (291.88 KB, 1200x1080)

Caleb Perez
Caleb Perez

Wow free love btfo, I guess we should just have state-enforced strict monogamy for the sole purpose of rearing children.

Hudson Stewart
Hudson Stewart

I'm still a Gnostic Christian

Interesting, would you mind extrapolating? So do you believe in dualist cosmology or something?

Daniel Gonzalez
Daniel Gonzalez

books
ooks
pooks
spooks

Attached: 3223120-20anthill20artist3Acarniviousduck20blood20c.png (1.03 MB, 720x1280)

Adam Williams
Adam Williams

Cuba is the only country that avoided the AIDs epidemic.

Do you know why? Chiefly because when they realized it was predominately homosexual men contracting the disease, they rounded all known and suspected homosexuals up and quarantined them. Not for a short while either - for about a decade.

Despite 20+ years of awareness campaigns, homosexual men in the 1st world continue to engage in risky practices such as unprotected anal sex with multiple partners, attending orgies, and sharing needles for intravenous drug administration. Now with the wrongly assumed safety blanket they think PrEP provides, they are at the forefront of another crisis in mutating HIV, all because "dont let men you dont know fuck you in the ass, but if you do, at least make them wear a condom" is apparently oppressive.

recently with so called "progressive" attitudes being proliferated, the HIV rate in Cuba has shot up again. In fact, a 90% increase between 2010 and 2015 alone. This is one of those areas where the idealism of internet socialists doesn't meet the encountered reality on the ground. apparently homosexuals cannot be trusted to simply wear condoms or stick to one sexual partner at a time.

As a socialist, I have never understood why this ideology attracts so many halfwits who think this is compatible with their hippie bullshit and their narcissistic obsessions. "free love" as a concept is bourgeosis as fuck, but it wouldnt be the first time one of you privileged faggots pretended you weren't.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit