Any other former commies here?

So is anyone else here a former commie? If so when did you realize it was a load of unrealistic bullshit? How did you come to that conclusion? What do you think is the best strategy to convert commies to Nat-Soc/Fascism?

I personally started my journey towards becoming a National Socialist after learning about the corruption, poverty, mass sociopathy, and all around shitiness that every communist "society" suffered through. How these societies claimed to represent the interest of the worker, yet mainly benefited a select "intellectual" elite. Which soon led me to question the fundamental principles of Marxist thought itself. History is so much more than a linear progression to "utopia" instead it is a endless story of conflict, struggle, and destruction and rebirth. That it is not class conflict that defines most of history, but tribal conflict. "With a few exceptions" That men are not born equal, and that equality itself is undesirable. That defining yourself and the world in purely economic, material terms is retarded. That economics and the way society is structured should be fluid "I.e changing to suit the time and place" rather than solid "narrowly deciding on one economic system, autisticly thinking that one size fits all" That economics should be a means to an end, not the end in itself. And that communism is itself a utopian pipe dream, incompatible with the natural hierarchy found in all mammalian life, and more suited to arthropods like ants and bees.

Sorry about the blog post, I just hope someone else has followed a similar journey, and I wonder how we can wake more people up. Also feel free to post commie cringe.

Attached: 58 best images about Nazi Propaganda Posters on Pinterest.jpg (468x640, 75.01K)

I was a tankie then someone showed me TGSNT and told me that "capitalists" were jews and that those same jews created communism. Then I was a nazi. Conversion was basically instant.

It's easy to convert someone who fundamentally despises the system, as long as they aren't a full-blown NPC or fully Bezmenov'd.

Kill yourself yid.

I was a commie when I was about 10 years old because it was the best form of government for managing large continental empires in Sid Meier's Civilization II.

Yeah Greatest Story Never Told is great, its what pushed me over the edge into going full blown Nat-Soc. I think that goes for most people here tbh.

Hitler talks about in Mein Kampf how communists were usually really easy to convert, and he specifically studied Communism in his early years so that he could more effectively fight against it. You shouldn't hate the average communist that isn't past the point of no return. Hate the leaders who have poisoned their minds.

Attached: Hitler on Socialism.png (1280x800 792.69 KB, 146.69K)

Agreed. Communists and Libertarians are actually prototypical NatSocs if informed that the supposed "capitalists" are Jews who do it racially as said, and/or prove that the only environment that Libertarian principles can exist in is one with rigid borders and ethnic homogeneity. It's like judo - you don't resist their notions so much as you just redirect their prior beliefs towards the right path and let their subsequent journey straighten them out.

They're the easier cases though since Communists and Libertarians are political-active types and tend to think more about politics and systems than average people. The question is how to convince other types, like Conservatives and Liberals, that the third option is the best one.

Attached: 1536866700851.jpg (750x1121, 582.64K)

No. Now go back to 4chan.

I used to be a stalinist. After watching TGSNT, I gained new respect for Hitler and become a strasserist. Now I am a genuine national socialist.

Hitler informs us how to do that too, but debating with those types is rarely beneficial, although I have had some success.

Attached: 1470931269633-2.png (1024x768 72 KB, 77.3K)

Just looking at different folks changed me, and listening to Rockwell.

I've been a National Socialist for a long time, but I've always found it easy to convert communists (who have a reasonable t-count) by pointing out that the "imperialist 1-percenters" are almost all jewish. At the very least, I've created Strasserites who I then tell to watch TGSNT.

Easy to convert doesn't mean shit when it's a fucking weak cunt trying to save their own ass. While the cowed dog may be taken in and used until it proves itself a detriment, a fucking traitor will never be accepted nor trusted. Where do you draw the line between a born again fascist and the jew sucking faggot BO?

A cowardly, easily-swayed dog can still take a bullet in place of one of its betters.

Why waste resources on a dog when you can use a jew to soak bullets?

(Checked)
A traitor is always a traitor, and I don't believe you should ever give them anything other than a bullet. That being said, there are plenty of "Communists" who are misguided, and not malicious. I am in favor of dispelling ignorance for the misguided. I am not in favor of becoming bedfellows with egoist traitors (kike-lites). All white men are natural National Socialists if you can help dispel the siren's song that is modernity.

kill yourself

Checked. Be vigilant.

That seems like the truth. I was a standard Jon Stewart watching liberal/socialist as a teenager, but I was still more focused on politics than most of my peers.

Those pics are gold.

Attached: saved.jpg (1032x1076, 89.52K)

Have some more because this board needs more Hitlerists. Read Mein Kampf

Attached: 1470931269633-1.png (1024x768 96.56 KB, 70.35K)

That is smart way.

Attached: That's great.jpg (500x456, 25.13K)

Attached: Hitler wisdom.jpg (1000x1817 645.54 KB, 500.91K)

Attached: Hitler likes this.jpg (255x251, 8.78K)

I'm of the opinion that Communism is a thinking-man's parasite, as it requires a host that has at least a slightly above-average intellect to comprehend beyond the free-stuff veneer and constantly ingratiates them for being so very smart for parroting its precepts. That's why the gravest insult you hear on college campuses is, "You're uneducated," and when the average Communist is challenged in a debate they inevitably resort to, "I've read more than you, therefore I win," or, "Just read this 2,000 page dissertation and you'll understand." Almost all Communists and Marxist-trained people I've encountered are like this.

Libertarians seem to belong to different camps though. There's the Conservative sort who doesn't think too much about any of it but grasps the whole, "Leave me alone," idea of it and goes with it without much nuance. And then there are the, "Taxation is theft," Lolbertarians who get stuck so much in abstraction and ideals that they begin to resemble the Communists in their rambling philosophical rants justifying compound-life and worshiping the free market like a god.


Good graphics. I've found you can debate with Libertarians, even the extreme ones, at least a bit. Communists you cannot because they believe the only reason to talk is to dominate the other person, and debate is just one more tool to gain power. Once the guard goes up, people stop thinking and start reacting off of prior programming, whether their own or what has been taught to them.


That's why the Romans would go after traitors first and foremost, even if they were traitors to the benefit of Romans. But what is the difference between a traitor and a defector? I'd say a traitor is someone who betrays those whom human nature would dictate should be owed absolute loyalty. A traitor to one's own family or people cannot be trusted with anything for instance because even basic extended biology is less important to him than personal gain. I don't think ideological change is necessarily traitorous behavior, though on some specific grounds it could be. Just seems good to be cautious about throwing around the label of traitor so it still means what it needs to mean and cause what it needs to cause in the hearts and minds of good people.


Ah, so getting them to oppose Jewish interested based in mere anti-capitalistic approach rather than recognizing the racial components of the matter? Seems like an easier step to take than going straight to nose-noticing, at least in direct political discourse.

Attached: Mens Club.jpg (611x343, 44.88K)

I used to believe "everyone is equal" and "race is just a color" back in middle school and high school. Looking back, I cringe yet am humbled. Back then I was just your run-of-the-mill suburb kid who just wanted to go to school, get passable grades, play video games, and enjoy his childhood while it lasted. The propaganda BS started around when I was in seventh grade history class. The previous year's was the same but the seventh grade one was when it was full force. When we studied WWII, we just learned its causes, the various important battles, and the prominent figures, etc. etc. Our teacher used documentary videos that was pretty much demonizing Hitler: it said he hated the Jews (but didn't say why exactly), and Hitler was half-Jewish. And of course we went over the Holocaust. We watched vidoes of Holocaust "survivors" talking about their time in Aushitz Hotel and the terrible conditions they had to endure. Furthermore we watch a video that honored the "six million" that had students fill trains with 6 million paper clips to visualize how "terrible" the genocide was. At this age, I did not really care because I just wanted to get an A in the class, so it was like, "huh a lot of Jews died." Looking back, this is how I was introduced to the Jewish Question.

Regarding the Jews, they are arrogant, visually-unpleasant, lower breed, racemixed, twats who aim for a unified world government where they will be at the top and the Gentiles will be at the bottom: two-class system. The Torah and the Talmud tell them that they are Yahweh's special people and that he is God. Yahweh's not even a god: it's a small desert deity that has little power. Jews and their shills brag about how smart they are, yet they do not realize the difference between cunning and intelligence. Being able to smooth talk a.k.a bullshit your way out of situations is not intelligence, it is cunning. I wonder what a Jew did in his past life to be born as a Jew in this one.

I thank Zig Forums, despite the shills and the newfags who don't lurk and just start posting threads like a pedophile in a children's daycare, for uncovering the wool over my eyes.

Attached: 1541565938073.jpg (500x240 441.32 KB, 98.03K)

tl;dr

Please, explain just one thing to me: if people don't expect to be able to argue about organic chemistry when they don't know basic chemistry, how the fuck did they come to think that they can refute Marxism when they don't know anything about it?

I mean, look at this supposed "ex-communist":
He claims that
1. "fundamental principles of Marxist thought" is that history is "a linear progression to utopia"
2. Marxists suggest that people are born equal, and Communism is about equality.
3. Marxists suggest that one should "define yourself and the world in purely economic, material terms" - bonus points for confusing "material" and "economic"
4. Marxists want to "narrowly decide on one economic system, autisticly thinking that one size fits all"
5. Marxists consider economics not a means to an end, but "the end in itself".

All are literal strawmen from anti-Communist propaganda. Whom is he going to persuade with this bullshit? Larping Red Alert fans?

People openly refuse to understand the position of Marxists (I will admit that it takes some time/effort to grok), but then get offended when told that they are simply unfit for discussion. What the actual fuck? Either learn what you are trying to argue against or stop bothering people.

Attached: marx_arrives.jpg (508x458, 78.79K)

Mcfucking kill yourself.

Attached: Spinning_ec9d8b_6384236[1].jpg (1200x1702, 306.46K)

this is a good post, I was more of a lolberg type until I made that realization that only white men give a single solitary fuck about liberty

You were never a communist, because you repeat typical made up bullshit about it. Pathetic, try to actually read something.

Like what?

They taught you "everyone is equal" in liberal sense, not economic chances or ownership sense, like in communism.

Corruption, poverty, sociopathy, shittiness (that is just cherry on top). Just because there are no capitalist rich, that doenst mean everyone is poor, just you live within your means. What corruption, who corrupts if there are no rich or private businesses that want to gain from that?. Sociopathy - where?. Because some old feudals needed to be removed in civil wars?.

Those were normal peaceful countries, especially after 2WW. Individual, i repeat, individual years of problems caused usually by forces not in gov control, but blamed on it and ideology, dont count.

The fascists most worth their salt are the ones who came from lolbertarianism after realizing it is unrealistic, as you did.
Although I'm starting to resent whites who "just want to be left alone" even by fellow whites in the increasing face of danger facing all of us.

Fuck it, I'll give a bump. Better than the other spam on this board.

Jon Kikeovitch is a liberal, not a communist. Just because you treat it as an insult to them, it doesnt make it true.

If you're pro usury, you're a basic bitch commie

Same fucking shit, one leads to the other. It logically follows, that the liberal idea of equality "We are are all born equal, and only circumstances I.e nurture affects outcomes" leads to the Marxist idea of equality "No one should have power another, we need to share all of our resources, and destroy all exploitation." Why do we need to destroy all hierarchy and exploitation? Well because we're all fundamentally born equal, that the superior is only perceived as superior because of circumstance, and not because they're actually superior. That "exploitation" I.e someone being higher on the social and economic hierarchy than you is bad because we're all born equal, and therefore they are no more deserving of that power than anyone else.

Bullcrap. Communism is an ideology, it doesnt belong to one group. It benefited ordinary people, not jews, no usury in it. Tankies would fight Israel too. Zionism is jewish natsoc, are you dumping that ideology too?.

Where is the usury in moneyless system that communism is?.

Why are you here? Noone wants to waste their time debating you so that you can get a high from it. Better off just going to /b/ or sticking in Zig Forums.

Im here to show you for example that any private ownership means jews take over everything, but in public ownership, they have individual percents, and non jewish majority has almost everything.

*thread

The thread isn't about communism. It's about ex communist National Socialists and ways to convert commies. This is the reason why it's a waste of time to "debate" your kind. You're wasting your own time anyway, you won't find what you're looking for here.

No. Scared?.

I was a commie when I was like 14. Then I got my first part-time, after-school job. I slaved away, washing pots & pans for a small time catering company an entire week. I planned out how I much I was going to save, how much I was going to spend, I've worked X number of hours at Y dollars per hour, which comes out to Z dollars in my paycheck - I'll be rich! Nothing's going to stop me now! Then I opened up my paycheck and saw how much the government took from me.

Nothing breaks the spell and frees you from the sweet siren song of communism quite like ending up being the one who has to pay for it.

Attached: 6d9fd61fda320a9768a609bc7b269ff11453f6b947a36fdf86ebe180c0c03dbd.jpg (680x673, 77.24K)

Capitalism screws you by slaving you and paying you scraps, but the gov took some taxes, and communism is bad?. You know bottom 70% of people (so you) still take more from the tax system, than put in?.

Other than driving on the precious roads and mailing the occasional letter, I've never once in all my years been in a position to "take from the tax system". Tell me, when do I get my cut?

Are you a fucking idiot? In what universe is a vapid generalization like that even close to valid? You have such an broken, idiotic worldview that there's nothing anyone can say to you, because you can't teach a retard calculus, and an ant can never understand a cell phone. PLease kill yourself.
Did you eat breakfast today? If so, I'm willing to bet you didn't farm the wheat for your toast, or pull the egg out from under your own chicken. If you didn't farm your own breakfast, that means by definition, you've used something that someone else made. Right now, you're using a computer you don't deserve. Did you build it? Did you make the discoveries in science necessary to build a computer chip? Did you pull oil out of the ground to make plastic? NO YOU FUCKING DIDN''T YOU COCKSUCKING NIGGERFUCKED RETARD.
Because you've used something you didn't make, you have to give something back. Do you understand? You have to make your own existence worthwhile, and pay back the resources you've so selfishly and stupidly taken from more worthy beings. That means you may have to push carts and bag groceries, or whatever it is you're capable of. If you want to detach from society, and live out your communist utopia, no one is stopping you from making a colony with your butt-buddies in the woods in Siberia. Putin will even give you free land. But because you're a spiteful infantile nigger, you'd probably starve to death because you think the earth should give you food for free.

Attached: 1541552816304.jpg (600x600, 70.98K)

Every gov service, education system, military, agencies that do checks so you dont eat lead in everything, etc, courts that put people in jails so you dont live in a madmax world.

Things you take for granted.

Most inventions are either gov grants/subsidies, even in capitalism. Internet you use was gov DARPA, www is gov CERN, even the chans running software is mostly written for free, not capitalist paid.

deserved dubs tbh

There's a difference between contributing resources for the common good and wealth redistribution. A whopping big one. And you know it. Paying for cops, for schools, for soldiers, is all in everyone's best interests. Paying for lazy, shiftless niggers to sit around and breed is not.

Lol well guess i was wrong, you found what you're looking for. I expect better of them, but oh well. Maybe they'll learn eventually.

Working so others could be trillionaires isnt worth too. Niggers were brought to US as a workforce, remember?. They got rich off that, everyone else got screwed, like with every capitalist decision benefiting the few. Stop supporting a system where that happens all the time.

I didn't think this level of stupidity was possible

This is bait.

Marxism did not develop from Liberalism.

> leads to the Marxist idea of equality "No one should have power another, we need to share all of our resources, and destroy all exploitation."
Abolition of exploitation (unearned income) means that you earn what you contribute. I.e. it is equality of opportunity, not of outcome. The opposite of equalization.

Either way, this idea is hardly unique to Marxism.
For example, 2 Thessalonians 3:10:
Literally quoted in Soviet constitution, btw.

I'm sorry, but you are textbook example of arguing with the voices in your own head.

Why do you keep pretending that he ever was communist?

Attached: really?.jpg (384x379, 25.59K)

Do you have any advice on how to break their partnership between ignorance and abuse of censorship? Any form of inconvenient opinion, no matter how much I twist it or masquerade it for them, gets banned, censored or ignored. In real life this goes as far as them blankly staring at me for a minute before helplessly reaching out to people in the vicinity to start a chant against me (that actually happened multiple times). I also love tripping up politicians and cops in large crowds, but getting through to them yields little results. It's infuriating.

Just natural. A phase of uni until you move to the cities for work and realise reality then you are here.

Oh great, another "muttmunism has never been tried" debacle.

USSR


shoo shoo tranny


Done better by non commies.

Capitalism is kiked
Communism is kiked.
Both need to die. Thanks for the revelation.

Attached: 220px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-2005-0057,_Otto_von_Bismarck.jpg (433x433 12.4 KB, 36.52K)

...

Welcome kameraden,

I have journeyed across the entire political spectrum through my life. I have always been interested in politics and especially 'fringe' politics, since I was around 13 (im an oldfag now). My 'progress' on the political spectrum has gone from bottom left to top left to bottom right to top right. Some I progressed through fairly quickly (I wasn't really a 'libertarian' for very long) and that's a bit simplistic. I never really felt at home anywhere until I started really, honestly, studying genuinely far-right or third position/alternative politics. I don't think I was really open to many of those ideas until I started becoming interested in the sciences, as Rockwell said NatSoc is really just nature applied to politics.

Converting different people requires different types of talking points: I'm more or less convinced that your political outlook has more to do with your personality than anything else, and people with interest in 'fringe' political ideas are much more ripe for conversion and dialogue than people with 'conventional/mainstream' ideas.People with conventional/mainstream ideas are usually just interesting in conforming to social norms If we ever took power within a generation these same people would come over to our ideas, because most people aren't actually interested in philosophical truth/higher ideals. It's also important to note certain people posture as being 'fringe/outsiders' who really aren't. Most (but not all) anarcho-kiddies are really just liberals, the fact that they want corporations and govt. to go after people with wrong-think makes this pretty obvious, most don't even believe their own ideas in any practical and meaningful way.

For Marxists, I have found the following talking points to be the most effective:
Anti-Imperialism: The Imperial idea is fundamentally a universalist one, and has as its goal the leveling of all peoples under a specific way of thinking and way of life. Many Marxists are fundamentally anti-imperialist and will even support fairly nationalistic movements (Vietnam, Korea, a whole host of South American and African 'national' movements) but are unwilling to recognize their own ideology has the same universal leveling effect and trends towards a global monoculture, so long as it presents itself a 'proletarian' rather than bourgeois. They'll support poor nations breaking from the global system and international capital, but won't extend the same to

Global banking and capitalism: Here is a point where we share a lot of common ground, but it's a difference in focus. The Marxist viewed the factory owner as the enemy whereas NatSocs simply direct the gaze one level higher and recognize the global finance cartels as the true rulers of society. This is also a good place to talk about the role of bankers in the various leftist revolutions, if they seem open to that information. This is somewhere that libertarians actually kind of half get-it, the understanding that ability to manipulate interest rates gives you almost infinite financial power and this is the major flaw and breaking point for the system. What libertarians wont do is take it to the next step and look at what those banking institutions are actually DOING with that infinite money, because that would end in a criticism of the liberal culture entails.

The catastrophe of Marxist systems: Marx was actually quite good in criticizing capitalism at a systematic level, the problem comes in implementing his solutions. I could wax and wane about why I think these have failed (I think they fail at a fundamental level, they fail to understand the human person and without this cannot scale-up to the economic level) but the reality is that they did fail. I think most Marxists hold onto Marxism because they believe it is the only alternative. You need to break them of their affection to Marxism and at the same time show them that other real alternatives to neoliberal capitalism exist. The Germans did this pretty effectively, and some of it was quite easy for them to be honest. The Soviet Union was a rising power that was attacking Eastern European countries at the time, Hitler during one of his speeches basically told his soldiers on the Eastern front to go observe and interact with the Russians and bring back news, because he knew they'd tell people how messed up the Soviet Union was by observing it with their own eyes. We're now fighting against a sort of historical revisionism that the Marxists are trying to do.

On another note, I find it's far easier to convert or at least have discussion with Euro-Marxists. I have no idea how to even engage with Maoists because I never really got into Maoism myself. They seem like an odd political fringe but they seem to be growing, in part because of the rise of Chinese power (despite the fact that they are in no way Maoist anymore, the reformists basically gutted that system and doing so is the only reason China is still around).

Attached: chairforce.jpg (500x666, 202.03K)

Whilst I was never a filthy commie, I do think these threads can be very beneficial. You faggots will be able to pick on those sore spots that make commies uncomfortable and either convert them to us, or make them so uncomfortable that they piss off and cease to shit up our board. Please share your story even if you do not consider it very interesting; it could well save a life.

These are of course only entry level discussion points. With any discussion with your political opponents, it is always best to start off with your common ground. Start with points where your ideas overlap with others, and then start breaking off to where you differ once you've started the dialogue. If you start off with 'why Marxism failed' then you'll just create an adversarial discussion and this never accomplishes anything. Political debates always have an emotional subtext, and opening with disagreement is signaling 'I'm your enemy, we're fighting here'.

Once you've establishes that Marxism failed, repeatedly, in a variety of contexts you can move onto the why, and this is more difficult because it becomes more philosophical. It becomes an education in the nature of hierarchy, the role of the government, the reality of racial/gender differences, the role of spirituality, etc. It becomes an education as to why you can't reduce man down to purely economic terms, and that this is the real rebellion against both Marxism and Capitalism.

Attached: taylorSSwift.jpg (504x604, 49.58K)

I was a Bernie supporting socialist, then when I saw Bernie get on his cuck knees before Hillary I knew something was off. My views began to change as I became more and more disgusted with the left until I transistioned to Natsoc, and from Natsoc to a Rene Guinon style traditionalist. We don't have to convert people, they'll do that on their own, and those who don't were always worthless to begin with.

I really just wish you said you started caring about your race, the white race, because its produced everything of value on the planet, peaceful productive relatively happy societies (which would be happier under Natsoc instead of capitalism) and because its under attack by Jews and non-whites who will wipe it out through a myriad of ways including but not limited to racemixing.
Work on it.

Attached: fuck-stalin.jpg (704x485, 74.93K)

I was born in the USSR, so technically, I was a commie. Being someone else really wasn't an option. I wore a red tie as a schoolboy and studied Marx, Lenin and Stalin at school and then university. I knew it was all bullshit (propaganda about a bright future cannot trump the reality of living in a shithole), but speaking out would have landed both me and my family in hot water. Yes, even during Stagnation.
Boy, was I happy when all this shit crashed and burned. Then I learned English, got internet access, found the chans and you know the rest.

t. old fart

Attached: 1304521594320.jpg (177x200, 31.54K)

We probably will never experience it but a utopian society did exist.

Attached: 12 years not a slave natsoc.jpg (2300x940 49.67 KB, 492.82K)

...

Some traditionalist he was.

"Theres a cultural issue in elitist Jewish cliques thats never addressed" bam kicks em right in the almonds activated switch.

Your bullshit ideology is dying, and we are the ones to kill it for good: one worker at a time.

By that same logic, how could Marx pass judgement about workers or work when he never had a job?

Welfare queen, if you kill all the workers, who is going to keep you fed?

Firstly, he did.
Secondly, he didn't "pass judgement about workers".
Thirdly, "not reading anything" is not the same as "not experiencing first-hand".

You are horribly wrong. It can only make you retards look like idiots (most Zig Forums-educated stand out like sore thumbs).

It may come as a shock, but every single one of those "ex-commies" is a larper. Including supposedly "Soviet-born".

Attached: no survivors.jpg (275x413, 51.32K)

Communism sounds all good. But if you want it to work you need eugenics.

How the fuck can you be a communist and not a racist?

Non-whites will never work as long as there are white people around to be robbed of gibs.

Even if you would find a way to convince the 10-20% of non-whites with a higher IQ to join "the revolution" then you would have the jews which would want to be the ones in control.

Ask them how much non-whites read.

I can't help but laugh at your unwarranted arrogance. There's a Russian saying "trying to scare a hedgehog with a naked ass". I think it applies to you perfectly.

We've got plenty of marxist kikes and isreali zionist kikes on here right now,see Breivik thread venerating the jewish terrorist

I thought communism sounded good when my 6th grade teacher taught the class it's "a perfect system that hasn't been tried yet"

Transexuality is a sin against nature.

Attached: The_state_of_leftypol_2.mp4 (197x196 1.9 MB, 6.89K)

How can a NatSoc debate this marxist notion that Fascist regimes really were only serving German capitalist interests, not those of German workers? Communist literature seems to go heavy on it. Should we even read it to better understand the enemy? What are your opinions on Michael Parenti's "Blackshirts and Reds"?

This is the deadly mistake of the commies. They assume people here are on gibs like they and their subhumans families are.

And then what happened, since there was a big economic crash after change?. Everyone started living in luxury?.

100% employment in communism.

You don't. It is straight up stupid and lying. Hitler tried to end class warfare buy doing what Bismarck did, forcing the capital of Germany to start subsidizing the workers' life while remembering at the same times the proles are utterly retarded and cannot be trusted with the life blood of Germany, heavy industries.
Proles are workers and capitalists will always be rich for a reason.
Hitler understood that. So did any non commie fuck.


People didn't have to force themselves to feed the useless anymore and they gleefully piss on marx and lenin statues.


Yes yes, going around the car park looking for lazy people is employment. Protip, subhuman bourgious western scum, we Europeans lived through it.

The wonders of capitalism.

Again and again the commie rat repulses anyone with IQ above 90.

So much winning.

No, there was much conflict and struggle, since the retarded commies destroyed many native industries and replaced them with obsolete factories churning out obsolete garbage - like tanks which no one needed. So, the people had to adapt, improvise and survive until their economies could be rebuilt. Some countries, especially in Central Asia, never recovered. Some recovered almost completely (Baltics).
Red-assed cunts like you made sure that there was a spanner in all works and that the progress was slow because "muh shared values" and "muh precious factories" and "the West doesn't need you". It took decades to root out most of red infestation of governments, and this process is still incomplete. But don't you worry, all will get their due eventually.

Attached: 1431747895898.gif (600x450, 88.61K)

Daily reminder: North Korea is a COMMUNIST state

Communism does not work.
National Socialism does not work.

Ideas that lead to senseless violence, to genocide, to starvations, to any form of mass death, is not the answer.
Both of those ideas have been tried, but they did not work.
There is enough evidence that we will be fine on Earth without resorting to violence or crime. If your conduct and mind is truly honorable, then this should be beyond obvious.

And if it is not: Reform. Reform, or think of a better answer. You cannot lie or cheat this answer. It must be the truth.

If you are curious about truth, then comprehend why our tribes were called barbarians once.

An answer is to comprehend civilization.

Yeah, it fails so badly it took the whole world 12 years to shut down a single NS state.
Every time.

Attached: 1323463719732.jpg (396x500, 28.68K)

it's just the same thousands-of-years old jewish tricks re-packed with a gay atheist skin.
it benefited jews.
if it didn't benefit jews then why did they invented it? you don't need usury when the population get transformed into literal slaves instead of wage slaves.
all jews are the enemy, not just their criminal desert base. you Zig Forums cunts are retarded.
You're one dumb motherfucker. zionism is jewish globalism with the objective of conquering the entire planet.

I don't think you are seeing the full picture then.
Either answer leads to an echo chamber, isolated from the world outside. Many of the ideals that National Socialism fought for are correct, but enough of them are wrong that it will not work.

If we want to build a glorious empire, then it's best to work together. But that is assuming honorable, fair conduct from everyone involved. Those that use lies or cheats or used violence to justify themselves will have failed to comprehend civilization. They must reform and join us.

If you are truly looking for the answer, the concept that is perfectly true, then it needs to be an answer that leads to life for the next billion years or two..

Anything else is suicide.

Have you even read any books?
I've read most of the trash from /leftykike/ (Marx, Stirner, etc.) and it's all completely idiotic. Stirner's books gave me a few chuckles as I couldn't believe that people actually bought the degenerate bullshit he peddles in his writings.

My advice to you is to actually understanding what is being said in whatever book you are reading.

Jews are not the enemy.

There are Jews that lie, cheat, demoralize, or do heinous things: And they are not humanity. Jews that live within civilization and produce good things are part of humanity, and they are our friends.

And it is the same for you. If you lie, cheat, demoralize, or do heinous things, then you are not humanity.

True humanity has an advantage because when a true human speaks, their words flow true. and they inspire, and always lead to creation. Not destruction. A person who lies or cheats or does heinous things will always lose every argument. It is the liar who draws a sword first.

True logic is comprehensible to all things of nature.
This logic means that all Jews can adopt the rightful path. It is up to us to let them in, and up to them to let us in. Dd not be so quick to assume righteousness.

The empire is better when we are not at war. It is better to keep building and doing glorious things. There is food for you and I, so are you painting or creating? Do you have things to write that are good true and useful? Focus on creating unity with Jews. There is no reason for war or death.

Life is better. Hatred will lead to your own despair. Do glorious things. Have a family, go on adventures, read and write books. Why are you not doing that? Is there something better…?

I can only say that no matter if we all agree on transient issues, humanity is united. We have to be, because anything else leads to terrible things. Run a full simulation: War at this point in time is the wrong thing. This is beyond obvious.

Cuba is. With DPRK it is a bit debatable (it is highly misrepresented in western mass-media; hard to tell fact from fiction).

Though, I'm not going to shy away from it.