Canada Urges World "Have Fewer Children" To Fight Climate Change

There’s an increasingly popular argument being made among left-wing environmentalists and those on a crusade to reduce other people’s carbon footprint: have fewer children and help reduce the population.

The latest to advocate this drastic step in human behaviour is none other than Canada’s state broadcaster, the CBC, who listed having fewer children as the number one thing Canadians can do to mitigate climate change.

According to the brain trust over at Canada’s taxpayer-funded media giant, quoting researchers at the University of British Columbia, having one fewer child will reduce your annual C02 emissions by 58.6 tonnes.

That’s a C02 reduction twenty-five times greater than living “car free,” thirty-six times more than avoiding air travel and thirty-seven times better than buying green energy.

When they’re being honest, many on the left will admit their belief that human beings are the problem, and that the most effective way to save the planet from the abstract problem of anthropological climate change is by reducing the number of human being in our midst.

Who is to decide how to reduce the world’s population? Well activists on the left, of course. Hence why they’re advocating that Canadians have fewer kids.
Lower population but higher immigration?

This argument runs in the face of another favourite theory pushed by activists on the left, often advocated through the CBC: that due to Canada’s declining fertility rates, we need to take advantage of mass migration to boost our economy and grow the population. Without immigration-fuelled population growth, Canada’s lucrative social welfare programs would be unsustainable.

There’s some truth to this last claim. According to the student advocacy group Generation Screwed, which I helped to create and wrote a book with the same title, Canadian governments have over $1 trillion in unfunded liabilities—that is, pension, healthcare, and welfare promises that have not been pre-funded and will drive the country further into debt as governments dole out their financial obligations to retired citizens.

Canada’s fertility rates are among the lowest in the Western world

Meanwhile, Canada’s fertility rates are among the lowest in the Western world. Canadian women on average have 1.6 children (it’s only 1.54 in Quebec), compared to the 1.8 average in the like-countries of the U.K., Australia and the U.S. — all well below the 2.1 rate needed for population replacement in developed countries. Without an open immigration system, Canada’s population would be in decline.

nstead, we welcome more than 1 million new people into our country each year — including approximately 330,000 new permanent residents, 55,000 asylum seekers, 353,000 foreign students and another 360,000 temporary workers.

As a result of the prolonged consensus over the need for more people, Canada’s population has grown by an astounding 10 million people over the past three decades.
Canadians want to have more children, but they can’t afford it

If Canadian women were to take the CBC’s latest suggestion to heart, they would average less than one child per couple—a lonely existence that runs counter to both human nature and the stated desire of most Canadians.

A 2016 Cardus report based on a Nanos Research survey found that 93% of Canadians said having a family was “very important” to them, and most Canadians aspire to have three children. The sad reality is that many feel they cannot afford the number of children they want—the most common challenge faced by Canadians surveyed was the cost of living and financial situation.

Meanwhile, Canadians just learned that the federal government is spending $1.1 billion per year just to process asylum applications, including for the tens of thousands of people who enter Canada illegally each year.

This number does not include healthcare, education, housing and other social welfare programs paid out by the provinces to asylum seekers, nor does it include other costs of our immigration apparatus.

Perhaps instead of paying for foreign nations to resettle in our country, the various levels of government in Canada could do more to reduce the financial burden placed on young Canadians that prevent them from having the families they want.

As far as the left’s contradictory thinking on growing or shrinking Canada’s population, if ideologues in the green movement believe that Canadians having fewer children will somehow mitigate global C02 emissions, they should have fewer children. It’s a free society, after all.

Right-thinking Canadians, however, should be skeptical of taking advice from zealots who repeat debunked claims of unsustainable population growth (claims have repeatedly been discredited, from Thomas Malthus in 1798 to Paul Ehrlich in 1968 to Al Gore in 2006.) To paraphrase former Liberal Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, Canadians should resist anyone who is trying to meddle in the bedrooms of the nation.

Russia has rebooted their ground effect vehicles program and greatly expanded their military bases on the arctic ocean.

Shit's gonna get real when there is open water 365 between Canada / US and Russia. They know it.

Attached: Lun.jpg (429x232, 22.11K)

Maybe they should take their message of “fewer kids” to african and arab countries…

Maybe we should be giving contraceptives to the Africans and Indians instead of wasting billions in aid.

Well I know he's not talking to me because climate change isn't man made.

Or, you know, stop giving constant monetary/medical/food aid to every single third world shitskin shithole, as said. Even though the majority of it gets pocketed by warlords and tribal leaders, apparently there's still enough left to keep their people fucking like rabbits.

Bump for deus ex.

It's far easier to do nothing but eat, sleep, consume, shit, rinse and repeat; than actually developing sustainable, self-reliant, self-sufficient societies. Especially when Whitey's altruism has surpassed psychosis-level's of self-hatred, to the point where Whitey invites them all over to his house to suck up resources.

Only white people care about the environment. ONLY WHITE PEOPLE actualy give a fuck about anything that isn't theirs personally (except japanese mai honoru). Only good white people treat reproduction with modesty and humility. Everyone else would just keep pumping out flesh. It's disgusting. I wish we had been more callous in the past: I fear the time to fight back may be rapidly passing.

DATS RACIST !!!

christcucks are too busy breeding them.

typical kike brainwashing. Canuckistan needs to grow back its balls, expel the kikes, smear the queers, bash the blue hairs, bomb the Bolsheviks and restore the pride it use to hold about being White Fucking Men at the pinnacle of Western Civilization. then Canuckistan needs to copy what Quebec already does and give baby-bonuses to Native White Mothers to encourage birth rates to go up.

if i had a time machine, i'd go back to 1939, clone Gobbel's, then bring his clone to 2018.
then i would put Goebbel in charge of the CBC and he would launch a thorough and sustained propaganda campaign to persuade White Canadians to begin pumping out babies.
Goebbel2 would twist the fake kike phenomenon of (((Global Warming))) and use it to justify
letting rising oceans and plunging tropical ecosystems as Nature Punishing the kikes and the muds for being the illiterate sub-human spawn of bestiality with Neanderthals. under Goebbel2's leadership, not only would criticizing (((Global Warming))) be a Capital Offense, but so would being against allowing Nature to run its course to make our RWDS' jobs easier by extincting the monkey races for us, so that we don't even have to waste resources constructing so-called Death Camps and forging Holocoasters and Wooden gas chambers and auto-masturbator-death-machines to eliminate the 7 billion mudslimes of the world.

Goebbels2 would even launch a national campaign throughout Canada promoting "Summer Chan" with her anime likeness postered to every building wall and billboard, encouraging everyone to do their part to burn fossil fuels and consume the products of fossil fuels in order to boost the CO2 released into the atmosphere and thereby more rapidly exterminate the lower races in their 3rd world shitholes.

Attached: father_of_87_children.jpg (1280x720, 155.32K)

that game

Attached: NewYorkCity.png (1148x524, 482.15K)

...

To reduce birth rates, try boring people with sex. Make prostitution legal, make pornography profitable, etc. Historically armies tolerated camp followers because doing so reduced the number of unwanted soldier babies in the next generation. Modern societies tolerate prostitution in ghettos for the same reason. Antinatalism is great - people are happier without kids, and we're on the dawn of resolving the basic biomechanics of life to such an extent that reducing the birth rate primarily reduces future expenses rather than future productivity.

Right wing people shouldn't get to decide the future of the population either. Note that third world countries would be dramatically wealthier if they were to spontaneously have smaller families. Concentrate wealth, don't disperse it; heir and a spare is the western way, and there's no longer much need for spares. Soon there won't even be need for heirs.

The basic purpose of the left is to maximize human welfare. The basic purpose of the right is to make everyone scream and suffer in torment. That's why the right always wants to replace pleasure with suffering, stripping all joy from sexuality and replacing it with screaming babies who grow up abused and neglected so that they have another generation of abused, neglected children thereafter.

Biology courses at uni teach this

the biology teacher had 5 girls/kids

when asked why he had so many kids if it's bad for environment, he said "because i want to be fit evolutionarily"

My biology teachers were proud cucks who proclaimed to classes of 200 people how they outright refused to have kids in order to help the planet.
Politicized science is no longer science.
Population reduction has no place in a first world homogeneous nation capable of developing space travel, and mass compartmentalization. Jews preach population for one reason alone, the genocide of Europeans and their replacement by non-whites.

Hmmm…

Attached: 270859.png (1000x743, 52.91K)

Monthly reminder that the Sun causes climate change
And it will get pretty cold, unpredictable, extreme and (thus) very unfavorable to plant growth. Famine, human and plant disease incoming!
Not kidding

Attached: PPE.png (755x1742, 448.49K)

Attached: ntozy.jpg (526x440, 56.61K)

They're literally one logical step away from mass murder.

...

I actually support depopulation, just not in white countries.

There never will be open water 365 in your or anyone else's lifetime, you fucking moron.

We're plunging into a grand minimum now. I only wish it had happened sooner before the last batch of migrants got in.
I just had a lovely stroll through an all white old fashioned Christmas and seeing their smiling white faces without a fear or care in the world was wonderful.
All we need is a good 10 years of ice to freeze them out back to their shithole equatorial regions so I can have my country back.

The ice is their doom.

literally remove gibs from Africa and the problem is solved

Is Earth some cosmic reality show? Is everyone insane? It is all so tiresome.

Grade A projection there, bud. Plenty of leftists want to raise their kids as sociology experiments who'll grow up permanently damaged.

If the basic purpose of "the left" is maximize human welfare by decreasing the number of humans, then why does "the left" want to continually import millions of r-selecting brown people to compensate for the lowered populations they caused?

Why not, instead of just supplies of food, give promiscuity, pornography, and a hook-up culture(which doesn't work anyway, American-Negroes still pump out niglets by the dozen) to brown people?

The reason is that is that "the left's"s purpose is not to maximize prosperity, or make everyone equal, nothing like that. The purpose and goal is to eliminate all white people, using any and every method that could possibly be applied.

You have that backwards nigger. Go glow elsewhere.

What's backwards?

Obligatory pics.

Attached: white_genocide.jpg (2000x1000 119.31 KB, 365.41K)

Guess who's responsible for preventing white people to end 3rd world poverty with sterilization and instead actively breeding and spreading poverty through the world, while making money out of misery through human trafficking, organ dealing, drug trading, weapon dealing, fleecing upper middle class and rich folks out of donations to make them feel better, illegal pharmaceutical tests, and of course slavery?

The lefts purpose is to maximize potential. The Communists and progressives on the other hand have no real agenda.

The only purpose of the Left is to be against everything that is to the right of them. And since the Right, like their names suggests, are standing for the truth, you need a political oppression tool to prevent the truth from standing in the way of organized crime.

this

Yeah. I suppose I was more so saying what everyone already knows about jews, at least for what they're doing.

Nope just a dedicated white nationalist

I notice they're only addressing the whites in this…

I know it's a symptom of the overall disease, but fuck Canada anyway.

Attached: _0_ (2).jpg (500x210 75.24 KB, 3.91M)

lucrative? What a shit box Canada has become

...

...

Schitts creek is a great red pill. Lovely show mr levys.

That buttercup was staring at me across the street.

True leftists never try to tranny their kids at all, raise them as faggots, have them embrace cuckoldry. Nice projection, faggot.

WTF that's exactly the same thing he said lol

too bad every journalism school in the country is pozzed and CBC is quick to recruit indoctrinated graduates.

come up with a plan instead of fantasizing about what could have been.

Good fucking luck.
Why legalize it if it's already tolerated anyway?Pornography has always been hugely profitable for the producers.
Okay, Buzzfeed. Now tell that to all the yellow and brown people who make up the majority of the world's population.
Substantiate this claim.
Then why does the left embrace socialism/communism? Historically the two worst offenders when it comes to the welfare of the people in their trust?
inb4 HURR DURR NOT REAL SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM
Sophomoric troll attempt or MSNBC intern?
Good luck winning hearts and changing minds with that fucking statement.

Attached: proofs.webm (600x600 888.92 KB, 76.25K)

This is one of the main columns of Cultural Marxism. Create continual confusion, so the average person is always unsure and doubtful of what is right and wrong.

Daily reminder they are actively terraforming and cloudseeding the planet to enforce this mass die-off in their suicide cult every single day.

I'd call you a filthy Jew, but Jews are more subtle than this. You're just an embarrassment. No (you) for you.

That is violently wrong, and not at all how it works. Are you sure he wasn't the gym coach?

Meanwhile, in Africa. . .

Attached: K-R-F_Selection.png (954x736, 521.03K)

Note that the number of civilians of interest on the list is 6 gorillion…
Duh duh duh duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhh….

I bet this user is pretty good at boring people with sex.

Attached: IMG_1382.jpg (500x321, 77.53K)

B-but, b-b-but THAT'S why we need IMMIGRANTS….

This.
Being anti-natalist (which is not necessarily a bad thing) can be a good argument against immigration.

Total population = birth rate + immigration - emigration - death rate

Nice meme.

It's been around forever, lurk 6 months newfag.
dubs begrudgingly checked

I've been here since 2013, but I have got shit to do user. I'm not a neet, unlike you.
Thanks for checking my dubs btw.