ROBERTS JOINS LIBERALS TO BLOCK LOUISIANA ABORTION LAW

Kayden Roberts
Kayden Roberts

The Supreme Court barred enforcement of a Louisiana law called Act 620 or the Unsafe Abortion Protection Act on a five to four vote Thursday night.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined the high court’s liberal bloc to prohibit the law’s implementation over the dissent of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch noted their dissent but did not join the Kavanaugh opinion. The act was scheduled to take effect on Friday.

The Louisiana measure provides that physicians who perform abortions must have admitting privileges at a local hospital. Abortion advocates say the law is identical to a Texas regulation which the Supreme Court struck down in 2016 in a case called Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt.

dailycaller.com/2019/02/07/louisiana-abortion-supreme-court/

Attached: Screen-Shot-2019-02-08-at-8.34.58-PM.png (489.51 KB, 829x317)

Kevin Edwards
Kevin Edwards

I want less guvment and less taxes for muh freedum

restricts personal choice, supports government trade protectionism, collects welfare

Attached: F93C7570-0598-49B2-93B6-9EE047FFD1C8.jpeg (32.71 KB, 600x484)

Brody Campbell
Brody Campbell

doesn't understand republican form of government
doesn't understand state sovereignty
Stick to the weed, vidya and porn. Leave the politics to the adults.

Attached: 5886a4b72836544022be9bbb3de46f8b9b7e6c1b79d1b276cac21b9ef4140e05.jpg (20.37 KB, 450x403)

Daniel Edwards
Daniel Edwards

Ha hah! Watch me strawman you. Checkmate Atheist-Communist. XD

Owen Garcia
Owen Garcia

Kav worked out well for conservatives eh?

Samuel Thomas
Samuel Thomas

Your first post was a strawman of conservative values you tard

Joshua Hernandez
Joshua Hernandez

murder is personal choice
Didn't think you were that retarded.

Nathan Thompson
Nathan Thompson

Chief Justice John Roberts joined the high court’s liberal bloc to prohibit the law’s implementation over the dissent of Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
FWIW Roberts reversed himself from the Whole Woman case to preserve the court's image as a final arbiter rather than a weather vane moving as the political winds blow. The jerks here are the fifth circuit appeals judges who ignored a SC precedent on which the ink was barely dry to give Kavanaugh his shot.

Ethan Garcia
Ethan Garcia

Actually, the republic just defined the issue and chose to shit on your kind. You got sovereigned right is the pussy.

Ian Richardson
Ian Richardson

The Louisiana measure provides that physicians who perform abortions must have admitting privileges at a local hospital.
All you need is a closet with coat hangers fucking bigots.

Jonathan Ortiz
Jonathan Ortiz

I want less guvment and less taxes for muh freedum for myself
I don't want people who want me dead "ie women and rich jews" getting freedom

Aiden Mitchell
Aiden Mitchell

Just wait until the Ginsburg scandal erupts. ;)

Ayden Gutierrez
Ayden Gutierrez

F93C7570-0598-49B2-93B6-9EE047FFD1C8.jpeg
first post jew post

Elijah Cook
Elijah Cook

What if its a black mans baby who knocked up a pure scandanavian woman who allowed herself to be harvested by the african because the jews tauught her to via the media?

Lucas Parker
Lucas Parker

ooga booga muh dick bix noood

Logan Turner
Logan Turner

So no abortion or yes?

Aaron Taylor
Aaron Taylor

Yup. Think what you will about Roberts, but his whole "thing" is SC consistency. And since that's exactly what the SC should be, that is good.

Jayden Sullivan
Jayden Sullivan

people support roasties engaging in self-harm and committing a glorified form of second-degree murder
let them do it tbh

Dylan Brooks
Dylan Brooks

i should also add that if a roastie aborts its fetus then it puts itself at risk of death in a worst-case scenario

Austin Flores
Austin Flores

Roberts has always been a liberal. Remember he also sided with them on Obamacare.

Liberal justices
Ginsburg
Kagan
Sotomayor
Breyer
Roberts
Kavanaugh

Constitutionalist justices
Thomas
Alito
Gorsuch

Levi Walker
Levi Walker

Judges dont have parties

Julian Nguyen
Julian Nguyen

Funny, because theses "women" almost never pay for their abortions themselves.

Cooper Richardson
Cooper Richardson

Shut the fuck up, Stephen.

Alexander Robinson
Alexander Robinson

why can't we just keep abortion laws that make fewer niggers?

Isaiah Gutierrez
Isaiah Gutierrez

No you

Oliver Stewart
Oliver Stewart

HEADLINES; LAWMAKERS PREPARE TO ABORT WOMAN RIGHTS LAW

Nathaniel Flores
Nathaniel Flores

<legal infanticide = liberty
<forcing taxpayers to pay for legal infanticide = liberty
This is your brain on leftism. Leftism, not even once.

Nolan Edwards
Nolan Edwards

legal infanticide = liberty
But it is…

forcing taxpayers to pay for legal infanticide = liberty

Taxation is by definition a loss of liberty. U don't see anyone arguing that it isn't.

<morality=liberty
Think again christcuck

Cooper Jenkins
Cooper Jenkins

My computer is currently targeted.
Openly I say. This is their Last hoorah if they are targeting small cogs in the clock like me.
They are afraid. and if You are a fed.. Protect and defend freedom as You have swarn to do.

Christian Lopez
Christian Lopez

Just wait until the Ginsburg scandal erupts. ;).
it won't, they will keep pushing her copse around like its weekend at bernies till trump is out of office.

Attached: 883904301646.jpg (452.05 KB, 1197x1500)

Connor Evans
Connor Evans

Yes they do, quit fooling yourself. In fact it's beyond party, they have political ideologies that only fall into two camps: liberal activism vs originalist constitutionalism.

Angel Cook
Angel Cook

muh christcuck
implying that only christians oppose that.
no, because i'd rather have faggots eliminated, and understand that evolution proove that races are not equal, subhuman mongrel leftist.
reminder that science is not on your side, and that's why you go for low hanging fruits, despite them still being above you.
also
<"morality"
nice spook.

Cameron Martinez
Cameron Martinez

You mean neocon activists and neutral

Josiah King
Josiah King

Christ, I don't think President Trump is THAT dumb.

David Nelson
David Nelson

No, but his supporters certainly are

Christopher Hall
Christopher Hall

Attached: DzCySJGW0AAv0fz.jpg (30.16 KB, 565x560)

Eli Nguyen
Eli Nguyen

current year
not being pro abortion
Legal abortion is essentially legal self-genocide for niggers and soyim. Abortion doesn't affect you because you don't associate with those who would do it. Aborting tards is ok though.

Jordan Clark
Jordan Clark

Legal abortion is essentially legal self-genocide for niggers and soyim.
You forgot to mention the thots

Noah Jackson
Noah Jackson

you're right. the inseminating man should. that'll learn you to wear a condom for once instead of pozzing

Landon Cooper
Landon Cooper

Neocons can't exist on the court, because neocon is a policy position, not an ideology.

Eli Brown
Eli Brown

And yet, even they were smart enough not to vote for Hillary Clinton.

Lucas Hughes
Lucas Hughes

Pretty sure anything can exist on the court as idealogy drives policy.

Also Constitutionalism is the notion that if it isnt explicitly covered in the document, its the states or congresses place to create law. Fair enough…but so weird you see Obamacare, a law based in actual law as agreed by the House and Senate and signed by the president while utilizing the discretion those branches have over regulation and taxes…BEING DISPUTED AND VOTED AGAINST BY RIGHT WING JUDGES. Its literally like they lie about their standard only when it feeds their political idealogy! Just like you! Its so crae crae! 2 faced Republicans cucks.

Attached: A835CF8F-1152-4A1A-BBF1-BBB1309E7CAD.jpeg (166.6 KB, 480x611)

Angel Clark
Angel Clark

Which way did Ginsburg vote?

Attached: ruthless.jpg (97.59 KB, 1280x720)

Landon Russell
Landon Russell

ideology drives policy
Yes, that's what I said, but that's why policy positions like neoconservatism do not exist on the court. Furthermore, the court does not make policy. There's only two ideologies for the court
do you want to apply the law following the original meaning, scope, and intent of said law?
do you want to "legislate from the bench" by reinterpreting the meaning, scope and intent into a new precendent (law of the land)

Roberts and Kavanaugh believe in the latter, along with Kagan, Sotormayor, Breyer, and Ginsburg.

It was Roberts who decided that Obamacare is constitutional because it would be considered a tax. The problem is Obama and Congress claimed it was not a tax at all.

Jack Baker
Jack Baker

it’s so crae crae
Are you a faggot or a woman?

Nicholas Davis
Nicholas Davis

<hurr infanticide IS liberty
What is the Non-Aggression Principle for $500, Stephen?

At least we agree that taxation is a loss of liberty.
I am a proud Christian, but my reasoning for opposing abortion goes beyond my faith in the Lord.

Anthony Taylor
Anthony Taylor

“Neoconservatism, variant of the political ideology of conservatism that combines features of traditional conservatism with political individualism and a qualified endorsement of free markets. Neoconservatism arose in the United States in the 1970s among intellectuals who shared a dislike of communism and a disdain for the counterculture of the 1960s, especially its political radicalism and its animus against authority, custom, and tradition.”

Money is speech, elections can be bought, religious organizations profit or not are exempt from standard employment laws, choosing a Republican Neoconservative president circumventing a true election…right, totally dont see any relationship there between the courts and Neoconservatism.

Cameron Peterson
Cameron Peterson

do you want to apply the law following the original meaning, scope, and intent of said law?
This is nonsense. It would mean that, for starters, the Second Amendment would only guarantee your right to form a militia, not own guns, and said guns would only be single-shot muskets anyway. Also your freedom of speech would not extend to the Internet because the Fathers could not have conceived of it. And if you weren't born in a wealthy family, you wouldn't be able to own land or really anything; you'd be a slave (except if you're white they'll call it "indentured servitude").

The Constitution is vague as all hell. It's required interpretation from the very beginning, and from the very beginning the SC has been "interpreting" it to push their agendas. It's only very recently, however, that those agendas have (sometimes) turned progressive.

Anthony Sanchez
Anthony Sanchez

bump. this thread was just getting interesting.

Evan Ross
Evan Ross

I disagree, I think gun ownership,was not the intent of the rule it was the ability for states to defend themselves.

Isaiah Wilson
Isaiah Wilson

Abortion doesn't affect you because you don't associate with those who would do it
They can't abort your offspring if you never reproduce

Attached: a42r1.jpg (6.7 KB, 235x201)

David Lee
David Lee

Abortion kills more black babies and hispanic babies than white babies. Keep that in mind guys.

Attached: 57706206a5a11f8f48064d32c1a3be43fd47fe83e3febdf2d861315794b6fe7f.jpg (43.83 KB, 1000x745)

Grayson Gonzalez
Grayson Gonzalez

Do you support killing white babies?

Parker Flores
Parker Flores

A fetus is not a baby

Jeremiah Bailey
Jeremiah Bailey

Only for the one pregnant

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit