How does one prevent the workers getting gangbanged by EVERYONE in a revolutionary situation...

How does one prevent the workers getting gangbanged by EVERYONE in a revolutionary situation. Pic related- Italian workers got fucked over in Biennio Rosso

Attached: A_sociological_study_of_violence_in_history_(Italy_1919-1922).gif (1280x841, 2.17M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biennio_Rosso
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Reminder that every other revolution in Europe failed for not following Leninist principles

Attached: 145841099692.jpg (880x1160, 536.29K)

What do the arrows represent? Handjobs?

whoms'tever created that graph and thought it portrays his case well is an absolute idiot

b-but m-muh r-rosa
seriously, she was a complete faggot and is only fetishized by the left because of her death. She's one of those figures who can be loved by all sides: socdems, Marxists, anarchists – and whenever this is the case, you know that pure ideology is at work. She was BTFO several times theoretically by Lenin, it's actually hilarious.

judging from the filename, violence

using what kind of measure pants-shitted, kilofucks, teeth lost?

Attached: red chair.png (238x208, 47.36K)

I don't know, hopefully the OP will come back with a source


communists attacked socialists lmao

if the black lines mean alliance, they buddied up with the cops and attacked the socialists a little tiny bit.
presumeably verbal abuse and tossing a book at passersby.

The number one article of praxis is to not end up face down in a canal.

I got it from wikipedia

communists weren't created till end of biennio rosso I thought when they split off from the socialists? i might be wrong though

tldr; well regulated militia

Yeah, the one in Catalonia worked so well

and yet for some reason you still haven't posted a link

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biennio_Rosso

WTF

Define well regulated militia

who are you quoting? when did i ever say ANY of that in my post…? The graph is taken from analysis of contemporary newspaper articles so of course it's not going to mirror reality

...

thats what happened in reality. the black shirts were a paramilitary force made up of reactionary classes who were angered by the "chaos" caused by socialist agitation (and the final straw, successfully organizing agricultural laborers in the po valley and in tuscany) and just utterly wrecking socialists through violence. Of course they wouldn't have been successful had the state not tacitly accepted and supported them. The police were happy to step aside or even work with them to destroy the socialists as a force, and that's exactly what they did. They killed them, maimed them, destroyed their bases of operation and their organizations. They tore the socialists apart and the socialists just caved in and collapsed from the overwhelming violence. The irony here is that the Socialists had had the upperhand for two years but they failed to prepare for this contingency.

That graph confuses yet intrigues me. How the hell did that guy get data so precise with regards to class?

Well that's depressing.