Technocracy

I have read a bit about technocracy and I think that the movement has some very appealing aspects. Nonetheless, I dont know much about it and thats why I would like to ask you guys about your opinions on it.

Attached: 1453428704328.jpg (1024x509, 182.75K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/cities/2014/feb/25/city-stress-mental-health-rural-kind
devonzuegel.com/post/a-day-in-singapore-part-i-urban-identity
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

its giant apartments. no thanks I'd prefer not to live like rats stuffed into a tiny box.

The food one has me worried. First of all modern agriculture destroys the environment also the quality goes down when you aim for quantity at all costs.

Attached: 1446083824967.jpg (291x227, 24.58K)

Then work at something valuable for society.

or just not have that

sounds pretty porky to me

Attached: 1448497841340-3.png (282x600, 66.13K)

its not ideal for anyone. Human's are not meant to be treated as cattle. Even cities are pretty unhealthy

theguardian.com/cities/2014/feb/25/city-stress-mental-health-rural-kind

gtfo utopian

This. Pol pot is right.

Attached: 7b8782e880979b59d9682903f989ee33c6247fc2eb31c35f83963663382710fa.jpg (985x1280, 114.15K)

working for in a market against others for status in society is absolutely porky

Kruschevite wage leveler detected. Socialism must be at a very high stage of development for this to be implemented fully, or else you'll end up just losing all labor discipline.

Nobody mentioned markets but (You)

Attached: 1505193359594.jpg (216x250, 15.13K)

devonzuegel.com/post/a-day-in-singapore-part-i-urban-identity

...

Attached: SppJbyy.mp4 (300x300, 160.68K)

this

essentials are all guaranteed
however if there is nothing to motivate someone to better themselves and society it would quickly lead to stagnation
go to work pls

b-but muh free range spinach

motivation via material incentive is inefficient and has undesirable contingent social effects tbh

I agree but have you got any better ideas?

I mean, we already are. Would super cities become obsolete in a technocracy?

Attached: 7d89682b3bd0de55c7b6e75a3e22479ff3b4dc1f610d7d7767388bd53828ffe3.png (432x536, 250.2K)

Wow, nice rapture to wait for, very secular.
Wow, wait I have a society now. We all pray every day and then it's perfect. Very nice, who cares that I have no actual reasoning about how this will be implemented.
I am so tired of these tech-tards, just closet liberals/fascists talking about goals, without mentioning their stupid means of achieving them.

Technology is increasing in advancement at automatic rates these days, and OP clearly states "technocratic socialism", so the material conditions of this system are covered.

I've come to believe that people need a basic material incentive to do work. They don't need that much of an incentive to do "better" work. There are two exceptions that I'd make:

People who have an intensive or unpleasant job need a consistently higher income, over and above the raw labor-time.

There should be some bonuses for great achievements, just to signal that what they're doing is being acknowledged.

These bonuses can be in the form of labor-tokens or additional access to luxury facilities. (get to go on vacation, get a theme-park subscription, whatever…)

I've also been playing with the idea of giving especially enterprising people access to significantly earlier retirement, which is great because we know that they'll never make use of it.

Except people with the most intensive and unpleasant jobs are some of the least well compensated people in the economy, so what does that do to your "people need to be compelled with money" idea

Attached: the incurable.png (518x511, 591.16K)

Yeah, I'd like to change that.

If a job is necessary but shitty we will simply shorten shifts to make up for it. We will have no shortage of labor power under socialism and communism.

Great. They should still receive additional compensation per hour worked.

They are. Instead of receiving X amount of compensation for four hours of labor they are receiving that same amount for 1.