The US supported the Khmer Rouge

Did you know that there's clear evidence that the US supported Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, and that they are therefore at least partially responsible for the Cambodian Genocide? The KR's killing fields are often cited as an example of the brutality of communism, and yet it wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for the support of the liberal-capitalist United States of America. How ironic.

Clear evidence is contained in this Jacobin article (jacobinmag.com/2015/04/khmer-rouge-cambodian-genocide-united-states/):

The geopolitical map was in flux after the Vietnam War — North Vietnam installed a provisional government in South Vietnam until the country was reunified in 1976, and Washington was determined to isolate the communist government. At the same time, the United States sought closer relations with China as a way of redistributing global power away from the Soviet Union; it saw Cambodia as a potentially useful counterweight.

In November 1975 — seven months after KR forces seized control of Phnom Penh — Henry Kissinger said to Thailand’s foreign minister that he “should tell [the KR] that we bear no hostility towards them. We would like them to be independent as a counterweight to North Vietnam.” Kissinger added that he “should also tell the Cambodians that we will be friends with them. They are murderous thugs, but we won’t let that stand in our way. We are prepared to improve relations with them.”

A month later, in discussions between President Gerald Ford, Kissinger, and Suharto (the US-backed dictator of Indonesia), Ford noted: “We are willing to move slowly in our relations with Cambodia, hoping perhaps to slow down the North Vietnamese influence although we find the Cambodian government very difficult.” Kissinger echoed these sentiments, saying “we don’t like Cambodia, for the government in many ways is worse than Vietnam, but we would like it to be independent. We don’t discourage Thailand or China from drawing closer to Cambodia.”

But the KR would largely chart an isolationist course, concentrating instead on its project of building a self-sufficient, agrarian society that ended in mass murder.

At the end of 1978, in an escalation of border disputes between the countries, Vietnam invaded Cambodia and toppled the KR government in early 1979. KR forces fled to western Cambodia on the Thai border to begin a guerrilla campaign against the new, Vietnamese-installed Cambodian government. The genocide the KR had orchestrated was over, but now self-serving foreign parties, including the United States and China, chose to support the KR guerrillas in their campaign against the Vietnamese occupation, as part of an overall policy of isolating Vietnam.

A key method to achieving this end was US support for overt Chinese aid to the KR guerillas. As the New York Times reported, “the Carter administration helped arrange continued Chinese aid” to the KR guerillas. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter’s national security advisor, explained that he “encourage[d] the Chinese to support Pol Pot.” According to a report from the Associated Press, US intelligence agencies estimated that China supplied KR guerrillas with about $100 million of military aid per year throughout the 1980s.

Attached: S-21_Skull_Map.jpg (1024x799, 287.34K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/-KTsXHXMkJA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

In recognizing them as the legitimate government of Cambodia and seating them at the United Nations, the United States, China, and several other European and Asian countries also gave diplomatic support to the KR. The United States even refused to call what the KR had done from 1975–1979 genocide until 1989, so as not to hinder efforts to back the guerrilla movement.

Support came in other ways. According to Kiernan, the United States spent tens of millions of dollars funding guerrillas allied with KR forces throughout the 1980s and pressured UN relief agencies to supply additional “humanitarian” aid to feed and clothe the KR hiding out near the Thai border, thus enabling the KR to wage their campaign against the Vietnamese.

In 1989, Vietnam withdrew its troops from Cambodia. Two years later, nineteen governments (including the United States, China, Cambodia, and Vietnam) signed peace agreements with KR guerrillas and their allies to end the conflict. But US support for Pol Pot and the KR continued after the peace accords. It was not until 1997 “that the United States gave the green light to go after the elusive Khmer Rouge leader [Pol Pot].” Trials for KR leaders would have proven uncomfortable for multiple parties, not least for some in Washington.

Indeed, when the Khmer Rouge Tribunal (officially the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia) was finally established in 2003, after years of negotiations with the United Nations, it explicitly chose only to cover crimes committed by KR leaders while they were orchestrating the 1975–1979 genocide, ignoring US crimes that helped nurture and sustain the KR.

Victims of the Khmer Rouge have received little justice, and they are unlikely to ever see it. The great powers (particularly the United States) have no interest in providing an honest accounting of why the KR came to power in the first place, or how the United States supported them and shielded them from justice for decades, even after they were driven from power.

Any lessons to be drawn about the consequences of US intervention in Cambodia do not appear to have been learned: as the journalist John Pilger has pointed out, just as the massive destruction of Cambodia by the US bombing campaign helped create the conditions for the KR’s ascension, the US invasion of Iraq similarly destroyed a society and set the stage for the rise of ISIS. And just as the United States supported its former enemies in Cambodia against Vietnam throughout the 1980s, Washington entered into a tacit alliance with jihadist groups in Syria against Bashar al-Assad’s government.

Indeed, if we can expect anything from US foreign policy, it’s atrocities and complicity, cloaked in the language of democracy and human rights.

Honestly I'm amazed the mods didn't just delete it, but yes you're correct. The CIA supported that psychopath

The only genocide committed in Cambodia was by American bombs you brainwashed liberal faggot.

Yeah
FUCK glasses!

Attached: Heil Pol Pot, Made by Anti-Glasses Gang.mp4 (1280x720, 2.3M)

Attached: MANIFESTO OF THE NEO-POL POTIST PARTY.webm (640x360, 3.93M)

Ironically defending it

wew. I have finally found peak Zig Forums historical revisionism.

Attached: 003c07697e54384d0f1b2edb7daeb7d197fbf3652e71cef81b1437806ddd6f74.png (261x238, 88.78K)

lmao, was the soviet union american imperialism too? They recieved aid from the US

...

That's a falseflag shitpost if it wasn't clear enough.

Were they getting US aid in order to fight against an actual communist government?

Che Guevara was anti-capitalist and pro Soviet
pol pot was pro American, pro Chinese and anti Soviet.

Please change your flag.

Nope. Che was highly critical of the revisionist USSR and preferred the ideas of Mao and Kim il Sung.


No it isn't you reactionary cunt. If you think the mass murder of Cambodians was done by the Khmer Rouge and not the US imperialists you shouldn't even be on this board. This is on par with believing that Stalin and Mao purposely orchestrated famines. Have a modicum of critical thinking ot stop calling yourself a communist.

The notion that Pol Pot committed a genocide against his own people is pure right wing propaganda and an blatant lie.

If you are naive enough to believe it you should get the fuck off this board.

hello where are the proofs

hello where are the proofs

Attached: 1445472041259.jpg (572x628, 31.88K)

...

Attached: killing fields.jpg (600x433, 118.69K)

...

nigger you what

Burden of proof is on you.

The Khmer Rouge were Khmer ethno-nationalists; they targeted the Vietnamese (including outside of Kampuchea's borders), the Chinese and Chams for genocidal killings. Tens of thousands of Cambodians were murdered for not being a part of the government's favored ethnic group.
As for the Khmer Rouge's treatment of the so-called New People (urbanites, intellectuals, etc), whether it qualifies as genocide is controversial since they technically weren't an ethnic group. The Khmer Rouge did consider them their chief target when they coined the slogan "to keep you is no benefit, to destroy you is no loss".

...

How about you give proofs since you are the one departing from the overwhelming academic and historical consensus.

Seriously.

youtu.be/-KTsXHXMkJA

Anarchists are gulag tier

see