Should sexbots be banned in order to protect women?

Should sexbots be banned in order to protect women?


OP must be at least 100 chars on this board.

Attached: g2424ygqwe.png (594x419, 44.83K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mWyB447vNjg
twitter.com/stylestruIy/status/993314377305554946
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productive_and_unproductive_labour#Marx's_critique
reddit.com/r/Nicegirls/top
youtube.com/watch?v=5j6H5awYJqE
twitter.com/AnonBabble

make it trannybots I dont fucking care I just want to fuck something when I wake up while I take a shit

Can't wait until fembots become common, the social value of pussy goes down, and men no longer will have to go through the process of learning to think and talk like that in order to please them

this sort of implies that male sexbots wouldn't also exist. tbh this is better since the alternative is prostitution which imo is much more concerning.

Neo-Luddite sex-worker movement soon

Yeah, adult women doing what they want with their bodies is so concerning.

and inb4 "but they're FORCED THERE!!" there are prostitutes in welfare states from middle class families that are routinely writing articles in their second and third languages telling anti-sex work idiots to shut up and stop speaking for them.

Both should be legal and safe

The whole point is that a fembot is an object. Antisexbotism is next level idiocy and insanity.

What does it even make men entitled to?

oh, bourgie women telling communists not to care about prostitution leading to grooming of children and human trafficking
of course a teenage girl really wants to have your greasy fat ass over her wheezing and smelling like a pig, dozens of those at a day, so she can pay her education and rent
they just love getting rich like that

fucking imbecile liberals

masturbation and self pleasure
good thing bourgeois feminism has some good old christian values in it that forbids such sinful things

who'd have thought?
and yet communism liberates them by destroying the foundation of their existence, capitalism and exploitation
how evil and oppressive

I love how you disprove your own point lmao

Sexbots scare the shit out of feminazis because once they get like Rachel from blade runner level its over for feminism.

Attached: ford.jpg (518x600, 41.33K)

As long as we have capitalism and people have something to gain from prostitution, let it exist. Stop with your woman-saver complex.

This but unironically

The worst thing about all these people is how uncreative they are.

There would be male bots, fem bots. And as an artist i think outside the box, why should a robot even look like a normal human? You could make them look like a fucking anime.

You know, if you even think about it….could robots solve beastilaity and pedo problem?


Basically the future is going to be insane if robots ever become high quality

You are very naively assuming these people are trying to make a valid point. They are trying to find new reasons to complain, it is literally a hobby for them.

In my imagination a sexbot would have tits and penises and vaginas sticking out everywhere.

sucks to be a liberal and yet again unable to adress arguments lacking any of your own

Attached: this is you right now.png (637x631, 18.45K)

The feminists cant stop it. There is a market (incels), capitalists want to make money.
If anything sexbots might lower misogyny and male sexual frustration

yep, it's a liberal

I think the only major possible social destructive side from sex bots is what happens to the concept of having children.

It could be like that futurama episode where everyone is just fucking robots and humanity goes extinct

You would know


I love how you literally contradict yourself and think me calling you an idiot is a matter of me not grasping the nuances of your ~dialectical thinking~

Liberals are literally (literally! (L I T E R A L L Y)) willing to protect the sexual abusers of children and powerless women just because they read a few blogposts.

Attached: shut the fuck up liberal 2.jpg (600x337, 44.01K)

Love how you just make that up because you don't really have a point

Depends on the circumstances, pretty easy to find several examples where this isn't the case if you stop learning about the world through movies - and I say this as someone from the developing world - which means the institution itself contains merely reflections of surrounding circumstances (almost like, I don't know, any other profession!) that shouldn't be read as an intrinsic condition of the institution.

Now you two go back to whatever reddit board you come from, because calling your petty conservative sensibilities "communism" by retardedly repeating the accusation "liberal" is not something that is going to stick here.

Apex stage capitalism

That is the hollywood movie industry you idiot.

Attached: 5e20e86e4192edea1f778ea0fa105586ad90a0c4862519c9ca6ad2ba3d3035f9.jpeg (640x640, 42.33K)

I knew that Settlers thread would attract this bunch eventually

Surely the people who opposed masturbation have said something along your lines

This would be a good thing tho

I hate both Settlers and hookers, ama.

t. liberal
People who buy drugs often indirectly finance that sort of abuse as well. Under communism, bourgeois drug over-criminalization will be replaced with socialist drug over-criminalization to reduce this.

feminists should like sexbots, your dream come true, you are finally free from male patriarchy because they are too busy fucking robots.

Or is this whole thing really just so you can have power over men?


Well, looks like men out smarted you again

Anti-sex work leftists are typically moralists who cloak their disgust in leftish terms.

Yeah porky says that a lot when they are trying to convince people to take less drugs.
I dont buy it. You dont need finances to be a prostitute. Its not a fucking wholesaler.

case in point, foldable human and jewario.

Shold feminism be banned in order to make the left something politically plausible?

Yes.

yeeeees

'no'

next question

Yes. But our opponents would still bring it up from the past to embarass us.

mulch it in a wood-chipper.

Because of the internet we cant even edit people or concepts out of history anymore like the old days.

Attached: cdb7d9fab5c291ff6c62649b109898c510f154cd5c2e0e8605e22db514eaa742.jpeg (900x554, 105.08K)

Of course not. Yes, the point is that the robot can't say no. Same as with any other tool; it's built for a task and expected to fulfill it. That my microwave can't refuse to make me dinner, or my dishwasher refuse to wash dishes, is not some reflection of my inherent attachment to the misogynistic idea that men should not make dinner or do the dishes.

Just because a tool is shaped like a human does not make much difference until proven otherwise.

Yes Dildo's can't consent

This retarded “women shouldn’t enjoy sex often” faggotry again. I can’t imagine bigger red flag than women saying “no”, especially if we are dating for some time, tell me that couple of times per month and you can go and never return.

That said, having fembot to fuck anytime I want would be really cool. I can imagine that a man like (me), man looking for suitable wife to have a few kids, could scratch ’’sexually compatible’’ from list and focus more on future wife’s personality and genes, which would make me feel more ’’free’’.

On other hand, why would any woman want to marry a man in this scenario, especially if we also add ’’living in socialism’’ to our thought experiment? If woman would be able to get great sex from malbot, have good friends to socialize with, have access to spermbank AND be able to live without fear of “starvation” for leaving workforce for taking care of children, we would live in very interesting, ’’free’’ world for both men and women.

Attached: 31270253_155856188591487_6464947188127498240_n.jpg (1047x1149, 109.47K)

No. Sexbots should be legal because they will protect real women from incel trash.
This argument reeks of idpol. Fembots aren't special in this regard; dickbots can't say no either.
It doesn't even matter because sexbots aren't people.

Dildos are actually far worse than sexbots, which at least retain the form of the woman. The dildo strips the male sexual object of all of his human form besides his genitalia. It goes without saying that dildos and related sex toys will have a harmful effect on women over the years. The male will become, in the mind of the female sex pervert, something to be used only for one's own pleasure then shoved out of sight as soon as it is no longer needed. Distribution of these sex "toys" must be prevented to save men from future misandrist violence.

How ? it’s not like male sex basketball invalidate men for all time ?

Sexbots are also good because they eliminate the need for live human sex workers outside of strange fetish shit or super high class """escort""" whores who are class traitors anyways. I think this is why liberals are so opposed to them as well. They don't want to lose their precious "sex workers."

Everyone gets a robotic waifu/husbando. But men should stop donating sperm in this scenario. Unless we get artificial uteruses and donated eggs available.

Sex robots are unironically going to liberate women more than anything else in history.

Attached: porky sjw34523.jpg (576x566, 78.01K)

We should size the means of sexbot productions.

just lol if you actually think this

How won't they?

how does losing sexual market value "liberate" anyone

only in incel markets

Monopolies are inherently porky.

But what if dildos, rather than represent a disposable, aromantic male sexuality for the subject to enjoy in the most hedonistic ways, with no strings attached and so on, represent a liberation of the figure of the man from it's sexuality, allowing us to appreciate our masculinity beyond it's crudest, most vulgar, separating it from carnal pleasure and the sexual organ which has been obsessed over for so much of humanity's history? And through this separation, also allow us to appreciate the obscenity and inherent hilarity of the physical object, the penis, sublated from a fundamental aspect of male physiology and turned into a mere toy?

Attached: sniffman goes crazy.jpg (320x262, 18.21K)

If you are saying something is bad by arguing that it's technically rape, you are in no way demonstrating actual human harm. You're merely abusing moralistic revulsion at a vocabulary word.

About 50% of arguments in feminist thought do this, which is why about 50% of arguments in feminist thought are bad.

And who will protect women from those responsible for 99.99% of the beating/raping/murdering of women aka normie men?

Low Autism Level reactionary post. Take off that flag, dipshit.

You, sir whitest of knights

With sexbots, Chads can rape women (which is what they always wanted) whenever he pleases. Win for all parties here except for 50% soy by constitution boys who relied on nice guy game.

All markets are inherently oppressive.

sex robots are actually a boon, they will ensure the extinction of men of flesh, allowing for men of steel to rise

as we make way for our children to rise and excel beyond their parents, we make way for the next step in humanity

Attached: 1489839450329.png (216x422, 63.65K)

Is it really wrong for a somewhat unnatractive woman to wonder what will happen in 20 years, when their husband could possibly be fucking a 5th generation sex bot on the side while having no interest in them beyond money, chores, and possible friendship, and at that point is it even really friendship? Years of loving someone and you're automatically reduced to nothing but economical ties by them due to something beyond your control.

It's a two-way street. Unattractive women can also turn to male sexbots.

pick one and only one

Attached: consider it.jpg (500x375, 80.51K)

neither can dildos


No but hookup culture that connects below average women to top tier men (when it comes to physical attractiveness) allows them to get sex with the hottest guys and for the hottest guys to get loads of sex, contributing to the incel problem. Something similar would happen with sexbots and women.

The less people are capable of having illusions about their life under capitalism, the better.

If the people do not want to give up illusions, then we take them from them.

female inceldom rises

Shut up whore. Your kind already does that to men en mass. This is retribution for your genetic inability to be an honest person. ==GET FUCKED SLUT. YOUR TIME IS OVER==

Attached: 6Z8jHL3i27rvP4squtmlGQYg0-LtpxVt0Wx3DU71F_4.png (633x769 165.28 KB, 58.36K)

youtube.com/watch?v=mWyB447vNjg

Attached: U2nmAZISl9l8iKt7qWXpc3r-rj7OZqZDqNmqQmR4_4I.jpg (640x474 126.14 KB, 126.5K)

twitter.com/stylestruIy/status/993314377305554946

JFL if you are short.

ITS FUCKING OVER, BOYO

Attached: 9ATx3DWekq5oSPLDt1agOd9NPWqxcb7S4Bp5bptehSY.png (960x282, 119.79K)

Evidence? These incel threads always lead me away from communism because just like fascists you think as soon as your socioeconomic policies are implemented you are entitled to sex.

It's not just about sex it's about love. I can not love a robot, but somehow men can.


I'm not sure what you mean?


Ignoring the obvious polposter why are you treating this like some sort of pol9k revenge fantasy? It's a legitimate worry. I could deal with cheating with an actual woman but i can't deal with this.

Removing a man from his penis is the same as castration/emasculation. Men are defined by their muscular forms and phallic (penetrative) power. It is the same as killing a man, and it is the ultimate goal of two theoretical schools:
1. lesbian feminism, which desires men to be used/discarded both in sex and labor
2. transhumanism, which seeks to remove all humans from their biology to better serve capitalism

no thats fucking stupid

exploitation is what is illegal under communism, you aren't exploiting anything if you are sticking your dick in a machine. unless the person making the machine is exploited, which they aren't if they own their own means of production and it was voted that we need sex robots for virgins or someshit

Attached: pri_54758566-e1506585278446.jpg (620x530, 36.43K)

ahahaHAHAHAHA

Attached: fb1ed58d4afa2f9e7deec03d8e6a809461c8278317ac7a29d42bf2bee527650c.jpg (858x960, 233.86K)

no, sexworkers will still be needed, because losing your virginity is about validation. Not being able to obtain it normally, you'll have to buy the experience of losing it from a real woman. Honestly, this idea that a simulacrum will stand in for life experience is probably the greatest illusion of our time.

...

You're legit mentally ill and need to be medicated

You realize there will be menbots as well, right? If anything 'goes down' here is the quality of human relationships and society at large.
If you can't be yourself and have to act and talk in an artificial way just to be able to make friends or relationships the problem is with you, lad. You are a shit human being, and that's all there is to it.


It's called lumpenproletariat.


You realize that you are on a communist board and that all revolutions (anarchist, Marxist) decided to prohibit prostitution, right?
>>>/liberalpol/


Liberal.


stop


Imagine IRL events of brony orgies, fucking robotic ponies.

Fuck that lets just outlaw casual sex and masturbation. That makes much more sense.

Nothing.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productive_and_unproductive_labour#Marx's_critique


Nah. Make feminism proletarian again.


This.


pdf


Well, the general sexual frustration and feelings of inadequacy under late stage capitalism sure produced the same symptoms for both genders:
reddit.com/r/niceguys/top
reddit.com/r/Nicegirls/top

you forgot to argue anything, retard

funny thing is the term incel was originally coined for females

Is this what a fem incel looks like?

Attached: 30x5w0f60ok01.png (1242x4442, 390.56K)

Nobody is "entitled" to sex, but it's naive to think that capitalist system's reach arbitrarily stops at interpersonal relationships.

Attached: 1485833334787.jpg (1594x2578, 303.05K)

What fucking year is this? Also sex-bots would be amazing. Especially if they could be configured to resemble guys/gals from anime.

Get real, you just want someone to blame for your lack of success with the opposite sex. Protip: There's shallow people on both sides of the coin.


[citation humbly requested]


And exactly what is wrong with the so-called "sexual free-market"? People have a choice what to do with their bodies, fam.

Attached: c500f8fd195346dc85f5989b76fcb864.png (900x1050, 472.98K)

It is so-called "free-market", because "free" is anything but.

Ignoring the vapid nature of that statement, what's your solution? Because attempting to apply planning principles to marriage partners makes you sound like that one incel that said everyone ought to have an "attractiveness rating" and only be able to date within that rating.

Buckley has a the lowdown on it: youtube.com/watch?v=5j6H5awYJqE

Attached: blinky nyaruko.gif (848x480, 260.15K)

...

Checks out.

Hahaha NOW women are concerned with perserving monogamous sexual relationships.
Sex robots will be to women what Tinder was to men. A dating Apocalypse, except it will be worse since women were NEVER conditioned to accept men beneath their station.

Lol this

YES
THANK YOU
YES

Attached: 4q8qZq0WCKdHXnzLkk6-YSq13qpoQabFab6UV0x_UPM.jpg (500x704, 104.67K)

Liberate them to a childless lonely life LMAO.