Iranian politicians burn US flag and chant death to America in parliament

reactionaries that murdered their socialist allies are leftist now?

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1200x893, 1.11M)

SOON

Attached: 'Ey Shahid' performed in DPRK.webm (450x410 2.94 MB, 44.22K)

shhh, dude, this shit gets you banned.

America and Iran don't have communist parties with the size or influence of the bolsheviks or left-KMT. Commies don't win anything out of this conflict.

The bolshies were tiny in 1914 tho user, also Tudeh is bigger than the RSDLP was at that point…

But WWI was a massive boost to the bolsheviks. To the extent that they wouldn't have been more than a footnote in a history book without it

Both parties in the US would support a war with Iran 100%. It's the best opportunity for a socialist third party to campaign on stopping the war, Peace Land Bread.

Just received news that Iran has fired missiles upon israeli military bases, can anyone confirm?
Is it happening?

No. But they have anti-imperialist potential. See: Chiang Kai-shek.

Is there any evidence that Tudeh has any actual influence in Iran at all?

It didn't work in 2003 or 2007 and it won't work today. The furthest we got was causing Obama to get the Dem candidacy but look at how well that turned out when he didn't disengage from the wars or drone campaigns. 9/11 killed any hope for a successful antiwar movement in America, the damage to the national psyche is too large. Americans will go to war with anyone at any time if their leaders say it was necessary. The media will fully cover their ass and everyone will gaslight each other into rationalizaing it away like they did with Saddam's WMDs.

The only thing that could cause a socialist revolution in America is someone who explicitly campaigns on killing free trade. However, Trump has already played this card.

the man who literally slaughtered communists in 1927 after they outlived their usefulness and then proceeded to ruthlessly weed them out for the next decade until the Japanese invasion forced him to stop?

He's talking about the KMT's anti-imperialist revolution against the European backed Manchu supremacist Qing/Manchu empire
So basically pre Xinhai revolution KMT was based but after the Chinese civil war started it ceased to be good

TLDR
CCP>KMT>Qing

Bad idea. If Kim resumes his nuclear program he'll either cause an environmental catastrophe (his test site is rumored to be unusable due to multiple tests, future tests would create lots of fallout) or get bombed and invaded in a preemptive US strike. America's military has no shame and will do it if Seoul asks, which is why Kim is working with SK first before America. If he wants to remain in power he'll have to play everyone else against each other.

America would sooner bomb every square inch of NK again rather than allow it to go communist and make the 50+ year shitshow for naught. Also Japan's bourgs have a blank check from America to purge communists, as does Taiwan. This isn't Europe where communists are allowed to operate freely, their activities are closely monitored.

Basically just Social-Democrats with red flags
Also basically a dead party
Still I'd support Japanese SocDems against US Imperialism

no, sadly

There's literally no, zero, nada, proof on this.

It's basically a liberal lie created because DRUMPF was taking too much credit on the "korean peace deal" (which is a defeat to America's policy in the peninsula, by the way) and dems got triggered.

...

Probably, but there aren't many other ways to rationalize Kim moving away from nuclear testing.

Unity is just lip service, in practice SK and America will gladly accept NK recognizing SK as a sovereign state and agreeing to the current border. This allows for official US and SK embassies to be setup in Pyongyang while demilitarizing the border and having civil law enforcement deal with it. SK doesn't want impoverished peasants in their country and America doesn't want to have to approve another Marshall Plan for NK. And Kim himself doesn't want to leave power.

The only remaining question is the nukes, but this is where China can step in and take them on lease or dismantle them. Which is another angle Kim gets to play: he can benefit from both Chinese and SK/American trade at the same time if he plays his cards right.

...

They're allied with DPRK, Cuba and the Bolivarian nations and give them help.

You'll have to not be fucking faggot and elaborate, else I feel offended that you'd even suggest that.
Tudeh in Iran is literally responsible for the shitshow we suffer now.
I know the Iranian old school communists exiled in Europe, they're a bunch of petty idiots.

Elaborate. Don't just throw in a meaningless sentence.

Attached: 1288220242183.jpg (244x320, 17.78K)

geopolitics is not dictated solely by right of association.

Most of the left in Iran, at least the leaders, deserved to fucking die. MEK was the right way forward, until that maniac Rajavi took over.
Those socialist allies you mention actually had a part in the early purges, before they themselves got massacred by Khomeini.

Tudeh is a joke in this day and age.

Chiang Kai-Shek was a fucking snake.
He would have sided with the japs if it meant he could retain power but he knew the people still loved sun yat sen and if he resigned to the japs he would be branded a traitor.

Based Iranians. /ANTIYANKEEGANG/