So why is homosexuality and transexualism so accepted on the left when most historic figures accepted that homosexuality was bourgeois decadence and needed to be outlawed?
Stalin called homosexuals "degenerates" and put them in the gulags
marxist.com
Engels was disgusted by it as well
columbia.edu
And Castro rounded up and shot the homosexuals in Cuba, and only caved in to capitalist sensivities far into his old age
pinknews.co.uk
Other urls found in this thread:
akarlin.com
akarlin.com
twitter.com
There was no real lgbt movement and people lacked understanding. I don't believe Castro "caved in", he just realized his wrongs.
Fuck off, porky. Homosexuality is ok.
People were just really ignorant on that sort of thing back then.
It's mostly ignorant attitudes on homosexuality present at the time.
Bullshit. August Bebel literally gave the first political defense of gay rights in world history. The Bolsheviks made it basically legal. Only Stalin took a more conservative approach.
Jews.
Western revisionism. How come that such deviancies were only accepted in the last 25 years? How come that it's still considered a bad thing in post-Soviet states?
But oh no, of course porky taking a huge shit on western culture has brainwashed you into thinking liberal college kids are right and great thinkers like Engels, Stalin and Mao are wrong.
1: Because the left is full of very lonely men who want companionship and cute anime girls. Real trans rarely look like anime girls because BIOLOGY. Even the pretty ones by like 30 start looking like Tom Hanks with lipstick. You might be able to make it last longer if you pump them with hormones at an early age…oh wait that's exactly what the gay frog mainstream Dems wanna do. Heeheehee good goy. (No I'm fucking serious. Give me my anime trap waifu)
2: Related to 1, sexuality is adaptive. In a normal environment people might think all this giant faggotism…however, women in first world society are hot garbage. They're unappealing on every level. They're whores, they're fat, they're stupid, they're mean, they're uninterested in forming a family. And while you may be able to endure some of those, noone can endure all of them. Most especially when you're called entitled every step of the way.
Want a basic human interaction? Entitled.
Want to fulfill your biological imperative? Entitled.
Want to know happiness and love someone unconditionally? So entitled.
It's like a fucking Republican convention but meanwhile these same people feel ENTITLED to healthcare, education, housing, labor protections, internet privacy…why exactly? When they can't even manage to comprehend why the foundation of a healthy sexual and romantic relationship is fundamental to stability?
And I guarantee you some pig cunt fake leftist is gonna try to lure me into arguing with them. I don't have too. I'll just wait till the next time his gf cheats on him, says its his fault. Or the next time he can't even get someone to talk to him directly for a job interview and has to go through five email processes but meanwhile some titch bitch shows her titties and makes 3k a week.
But what's really his fault is the Elliot Rodgers. The next time some kid shoots up his school, the blood is on liberals hands for advocating liberalism. And we should celebrate those deaths as it's just cockroaches eating their own young.
nice try Zig Forums
t.
Zig Forums pseudointelecual
Homosexuality in former socialist states, like soviet union, was based on simple "don't ask don't tell" policy. It's awful to see a man (not to mention two men) to kiss on public spaces, but that doesn't mean gays were lynched on the streets or forced into sterilization.
because solidarity binds. we don't give a fuck who you are, if porky has his boot on your neck then join the club
product of the time. unbiased information and education on the matter was nonexistent
The larping is off the scales.
We should love these men for their economic philosophy, their social views are largely irrelevant. Is it really so shocking that people born in the the early 20th century would have outdated social views?
the archives were tempered with
Stalin made no remarks anywhere else on the matter
his personal flaws on the issue would be irrelevant too
however there never was any real persecution of homosexuals in the Soviet Union
there were less criminal cases in the entire history and all of the SU, that includes the time of the "great terror", compared to western germany till it's legalization there
which was also something the GDR was ahead of by decades
and even then it was 1. either a charge put on extra on top of treason and such to drag the name through the mud in front of a largely still backwards population and 2. treated as a "mental illness"
if there was great thought put into this, there'd be theoretical works written on it by Stalin or his comrades, yet there is no such thing
this is one of the most elaborate shitposts i've seen in a while
Social views are just that…capitalism having another metamorphosis. Fuck even 90s liberalism doesn't act anything like kiddy wowow millennial liberalism. Trump is a 90s liberal. He's not homophobic he's not racist, he's just pure American chauvinism.
But in the current year that's conservatism. So therefore it's bad. Hashtag so reactionary. Hashtag you let a corporate algorithm developed by child predators determine your views.
Pic semi relayed as whatever happened to vegans and animal rights activists being on the left? Funny how just cause liberals stopped talking about them so did a lot of you…
Ever since the economic arguments for marxism were proven false about 5 decades ago, the new approach is to use marginalized classes to populate the revolutionary ranks. There ya go.(fuck off jordan peepeeson)
Whats this?
What does Zig Forums think of these?
akarlin.com
akarlin.com
The better blogger on homosexuality was a guy that basically reviewed Foucault work and "proved" that Foucault was pointing towards a negative depiction of homosexuality and sexuality in general but he (Foucault) was too much of a pussy or liar to say it out loud.
I forget the name of the blog
homosexuality is only accepted in capitalist countries and by first worldist leftists.
all Marxist Leninist states suppressed homosex before they became revisionist
It was legal under Lenin you dumb cunt.
Because it's actually degenerate. Gorky once said if you eradicate homosexuality you'll defeat fascism.
Dude are you sober? That was unintelligible.
