Is Not Socialism real socialism? If so, why? If not, why not? Please provide empirical...

Is Not Socialism real socialism? If so, why? If not, why not? Please provide empirical, unbiased sources to support your reasoning.

Pic unrelated

Attached: 1499206792238.jpg (600x655, 58.25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

spartacus-educational.com/GERlabour.htm
piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/capitalisback/CountryData/Germany/Other/Pre1950Series/RefsHistoricalGermanAccounts/BuchheimScherner06.pdf
ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

We have this stupid thread everyday

How would real Not Socialism work, then?

Not at all. Not only has it historically gone against all principles of socialism (such as abolishing private property and internationalism), even in theory it's not supposed to be "socialist" in the Marxist sense of the word. Hitler quote related

Attached: nazi vs socialist (2)

Why is this a bad thing tho

Attached: f8b13c94d6f0a16c353ff9816818374844116325442f5489cea5bc37572ecd2d.png (294x294, 32.9K)

But if socialism is about not having private industry, doesn't that make NutSac extremely socialist?

What are you talking about? Nazis encouraged privatization.

Then what is?

BASED WORDFILTER STRIKES AGAIN

Attached: slavs.gif (500x281, 467.2K)

stop responding to bait plz kthx

If by "extremely socialist" you mean "extremely capitalist" then yes.

Attached: 9fe00958d38d6ad2d0681d5ae8bd2fe4cdaf2b2591d0defe28d28a76c85fc326-2.gif (500x419, 177.46K)

Is that a good or bad thing and why?

who are you quoting

...

It's a good thing. No more baboons.

That doesn't sound like a very leftist thing to say.

spartacus-educational.com/GERlabour.htm

He said they went against the idea of abolishing private property, learn to read

The person you're replying to is a Zig Forumsyp, the flag should have kind of established that

Are you retarded? Re read that sentence you quoted. Does it say nazis abolished private property?

Yes?

Attached: 24243b0a56d9a33c2e50836b6b9916b2ab471c347ad2f18d2269fd2a65c8294c.png (250x250, 27.27K)

Allowing lower forms of life to destroy you isn't leftist either.

"Love yourself and your blood first and foremost". – Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program, Trier Germany, 1845.

So genocide is definitely a leftist trait?

he's just trolling in case that wasn't clear from the low effort baboonposting and "Critique of the Gotha Program, 1845"

You're either shitposting, false-flagging to yourself, or using some sort of browser that doesn't show that the person you're replying to is posting with a nazi flag

Attached: basic economics.png (792x543, 171.39K)

I mean, going by what the guys in this thread are saying, it sounds super socialist to me. Why would people call it national "socialism" if it isn't actually socialism?

Attached: 1e1acd93c92032c65fe1adc31115b8c96f07df1891cbaf737a0da8b92fc2525e.png (259x377, 72.64K)

Why would you call them butterflies if they're not flying butter?

your thread is retarded and you should feel ashamed
if you lack that much awareness then you are a prime example for why we need to adopt the idea of euthanasia for mentally handicapped people that define themself as politically movitaved

Attached: 1526124287641.jpg (628x534, 75.29K)

But in German bats are called "Fledermaus", which means "flutter mouse", so obviously the Germans are good at naming things.

Abolishing private property is the socialist stance. Hitler did not abolish private property, quite the contrary he privatized large parts of previously nationalized industry.
What the fuck is it you don't get?

The nazis invented privitization.

Abolishing private property is used as an example of the socialist principles that Nazis were opposing.

Here's a sample sentence, same format: Dr. Mingenheimer opposed all principles of medicine (such as treating patients and curing disease). The things in parentheses are examples of things he did not do, which are associated with medicine. Accordingly, 'Mingenheimer' is only nominally a doctor and does not actually practice medicine.

horseshoe theory fags fuck off

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (546x700, 437.29K)

How is nazism the complete opposite of socialism?

But why would they call it "national" "socialism" if it was neither national or socialist?

To win the working class. Read a fucking history book, mutt.
It was national though. Kind of.

It's a fucking mystery

Attached: hortler.png (1127x1641, 3.51M)

ancap discovers propaganda

more news at 11

"What right do these people have to demand a share of property or even in administration?… The employer who accepts the responsibility for production also gives the workpeople their means of livelihood. Our greatest industrialists are not concerned with the acquisition of wealth or with good living, but, above all else, with responsibility and power. They have worked their way to the top by their own abilities, and this proof of their capacity – a capacity only displayed by a higher race – gives them the right to lead."

Adolf Hitler to Max Amann, May 1930 quotes in A History of Not Socialism (Responding to Fascism Vol 2)

piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/capitalisback/CountryData/Germany/Other/Pre1950Series/RefsHistoricalGermanAccounts/BuchheimScherner06.pdf

ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

Attached: 6240.jpg (679x482 140.56 KB, 159.97K)