Why do self-proclaimed "anarcho-communists" want to defend government-funded on-demand abortions...

Why do self-proclaimed "anarcho-communists" want to defend government-funded on-demand abortions? How would abortion be handled in an "anarcho-communist" society?
twitter.com/AnarchoVet/status/1005535531592081408

Attached: embraceathirdposition.png (530x687, 173.5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RVBUjGWWo0U
twitter.com/AnarchoVet/status/1005535531592081408
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

With a coat hanger

Kill yourself OP

I guess. I can't think of a job more useless than stopping the youth from coming into existence - probably for the sake of women furthering their careers, which will lead to the further feminization of work, decreased productivity, and endangerment of women (if taken to it's logical conclusion, which is women working on mines and oil rigs).

I'll kill myself if you bring me at least twice my weight in dead commies in return. Leave em on my doorstep and I'll leave the money in the mailbox.

Abortion isn't even a communist issue. It is a common sense issue, and any communist would want society to provide basic necessity, including abortion being a medical necessity.

Ban on abortions is an issue introduced entirely by a Jewish desert cult.

Now, why would a retarded Nutsac defend an entirely religious Jewish dogma is a better question. I bet you're also pro male genital mutilation.

That's an impossible to fulfill order. You'd have to kill 2 earths worth of people, at least.

Attached: hfgyg5r6.jpg (150x207, 25.07K)

Attached: 75e5308b64d4fca7b499dfd18c960f5fd17107f5c863fe820b41c09477c0f600.jpg (3638x1308, 1.42M)

P.s. While abortion is an undesirable, it's better than:
- a birth of an undesirable baby.
- a coathanger, or self-poisoning
- an underground medical network, that would inevitably flourish due to it being a victimless crime, where everyone involved benefit.

Attached: 333152a5836aa8dc1cca94217e5d05e8d64c19440d491eb650d7018bee4500e5.jpg (3990x2245, 1.62M)

ah yes the turd position
Capitalism with German Characteristics

Attached: DNVvJK6VQAAARIp.jpg (601x622, 45.18K)

I'm not aware of any pagan sources that mention abortion, and I doubt that it would be in a positive or neutral light if it was mentioned. I don't believe it was present in prechristian yurp, especially anywhere close to how it is now. It's common sense for women to bear and raise children, not to allow them to kill them for selfish reasons or because the child would be a bastard.

It'd be about 300 pounds. I'm a former wrestler but I've probably put 10 or 15 on since I left school.

I ain't readin that shit nigga

Shouldn't have had sex
I guess you should have the kid then
Oppress and destroy the black market to the best of the state's ability.

Attached: 3292718ba22b3a15d34337f446f868fbb25fc8892737c7550db113e7d263406a.png (1024x823, 557.14K)

OP, you're a dumbass. Also your kind defends abortions in ghettoes to "keep the nigger population down", so gfy.

S A V A G E
A
V
A
G
E

There's only one way to stop the youth from coming into existence: anti-natalism. Embrace it today; the capitalists can't enslave the workers if they don't exist.

Attached: you_have_homosexual.jpg (750x467, 37.78K)

Anarchist politics tend to use activism as a way to spread their ideas because it makes people sympathetic to their cause, which helps make up for a lack of theory. State-funded abortions are a myth anyway, Planned Parenthood is a general reproductive health service and the public funding goes to the rest of their services, not abortions.
Whoever made that picture also does not seem to understand what the fallacy of the golden mean is. Fascists reject economics.

The Romans were famously fond of exposing infants. It's like abortion except that it actually is child murder. So much for pre-christian society.

You probably should.
Rape. Yes, this exists even in a modern society, and is not literally a symptom of a nonwhite populace.

Not surprising at all tbqh matey

If we just stopped dealing with niggers at all, the population would keep itself down. As it stands, foreign aid has fueled a population explosion in Africa that is causing massive amounts of suffering. I am pronatal for my own and indifferent to others. Antinatalism as far as I can see it is just depressive fucks removing themselves from the gene pool, and good riddance.

And you're a liberal euphemist.

youtube.com/watch?v=RVBUjGWWo0U

Pfffthaha butthurt. Anarchists have tons of theory, you just choose to ignore it. Sad.

How are we supposed to deliver 500 kgs of dead commies on your doorstep?

pronatalism at alls fuels suffering, especially in capitalist society. Read Schopenhauer & David Benatar. But what am I saying? Nazifags can't read.

Most foreign aid isn't done by the government, and Africa actually exports much more wealth than it takes in. Foreign aid is bad, but not for the reasons you think: it's a front for neocolonialism. African leaders are basically puppets of the developed world and humanitarian causes provide an excuse to maintain presence in the continent instead of letting them develop their own economies, which has been stopped by force in the past.
We are not liberals, and that is not a euphemism.

To elaborate on an entirely informative video:
Both Hellenistic, Germannic and Confucian societies tolerated abortion. Abortions (and baby killings) were also tolerated in Traditional folk cultures of societies that have adopted the Jewish faiths too.

Noone CHOOSES to have sex and abortion for funsies, it is always an undesirable accident. Point discarded.

Would go as well as alcohol prohibition, point discarded.

The Romans were fucked up in general though. That can't be all put on their religions. The Spartans practiced infanticide now that I think of it, but I'm Nordic, so I don't really think of the Spartans as being my forebears.

Most abortions are given to women who had consensual sex. Moreover, in a traditional society, the rapist would be forced to marry the girl and raise the kid or he would be killed.

Pic related

I know the antinatalist arguments, and I've come to the conclusion previously on my own without even knowing about it. I reject it for reasons I'm not going to go into here because it's outside of the discussion I'm trying to have and would involve getting 2deep4u, which would mean I would have to take a minute to think of what I'm saying, and I'm probably going to be banned in 10 minutes anyway.

You're more liberal than you think you are if you believe in women's rights at the expense of collective interests. I'm not going to address the kangspiracy theory.

Attached: fatberg.jpg (1200x1183, 295.74K)

real savior of the aryan man, right here

Attached: rly make u thenk.gif (498x498, 616.86K)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Not if the idea of "human rights" was done away with.

More people = more hands to hold and manufacture more guns. There's nothing imaginary about the idea of strength in numbers.

I was going to refute your point, but you apparently did it for me. Dear lord.
I don't, I'm only pointing that Western conservatives are outright lying about their cause. I do not care for liberalism, but anti-abortion activists are notoriously sociopathic.
It's not literal theft, it's just how the global economy works, which has nothing to do with white nationalist burgermutt fantasies.

fascism is like a dark kafkaesque parody of children's tales where problems are solved with the "power of friendship"

I'm not sure what you're trying to imply. Women deliberately trying to carry so that they may have an enjoyment of having an abortion?

Please elaborate, how would "human rights" help or prevent cracking down on victimless crime. Because you see, victimless crime persecution is bad not because of this or that morals. But because it is impossible to intercept it due to having no party that would be willing to cooperate with authorities, which, in turn, would give a huge boost to the Organized Crime.

Far right politics are entirely dependent on playing the victim when people want them gone. I doubt this will bode well for you.

???

It's pretty well established within international politics studies that foreign aid is more often than not just another tool to front a country's foreign policy. Guess how the Camp David accords came to be - through a shitload of cash paid to Egypt under the guise of 'foreign aid'. The same goes for other countries.

Western donors aren't stupid. They know a lot of aid money will be embezzled, redirected or 'lost', but that's not necessarily a bad thing if you need to coax favours or preferential treatment for your companies from some dictator without the media raising a stink about it.

God damn Nazis are so incredulous

As Shakespeare put it: "Good wombs hath born bad sons", if those white kids hadn't been born they wouldn't have shot up all our schools in 'Merica and killed even more white kids.

Nazifags & assorted reactionaries like you are the only ones whining about women being able to vote & have jobs. You're the minority, I would hardly call you people who less than 0.5% of the population "national interests".

Attached: have_you_gone_nuts.png (249x264, 69.38K)

the real world does not function because the aryan man carries the nigger savages on his back, your entire worldview is based on horseshit meant to divide people with common interests

Attached: substantially amused.jpg (275x183, 8.5K)

The thing is we don't know that much about those. The written record, and the recording of oral sagas, is entirely written by christians, so buyer beware.

In general, we still–to an extent–support state-managed social services and welfare, because all leftists advocate for large-scale social welfare. But under capitalism, welfare can only help so many people, and it's main goal is to preserve the capitalist system.

If the resources run out, the hands can be made into fists.

I'm stating that people have sex of their own volition. This is how most sex is, at least in the west.
Abortion isn't a victimless crime. The child is the primary victim and the society is the secondary victim. Disregard (to an extent at least) for human rights would allow violators of the law to be killed to produce a chilling effect on the rest of the population.

If there are people taking action to make it so white people are gone and white people claim they're being victimized, there's no "play". They are victims.

I'm not going to address it because I'm not familiar with it. I didn't mean any more derision than I'm just generally oozing onto everyone in the thread.

*appeals to popular democracy in the service of female emancipation*
Keep telling yourself you have something challenging to say to the powers that be.

Sturluson was a crypto-heathen.

Blacks have an interest in receiving having white peoples' money, white people do not have an interest in giving their money to blacks. Fuck off.

You're an imbecile.

How can large-scale social welfare, particularly professional abortion, be managed without hierarchy?

Lulz argument.

It's not like you even offered an argument as to why women should be disenfranchised. Is it because they intimidate you?
Did just come here in a time machine from 2009? Because if so, take me back with you.

The difference between liberals and socialists is that liberals are incredulous to the vices of capitalism. The reason we don't like liberals is that thy're more concerned with identity politics than actually changing the system for the better. They don't want socialism, they want capitalism with 'progressive' characteristics.

Trying to equate American dyed-hair college liberals to people like Lenin or Stalin just because they both favour emancipation of [group] is fucking retarded regardless. It's like calling a wheelchair a train just because both have wheels.


The porkies and their stooges in politics whom most Nazis seem perfectly happy to ignore as long as they're not Jewish. It's also rich that someone who does the bidding of capital by dividing the working class along ethnic lines accuse actual socialists of not challenging the establishment. SAD!

Why would you need hierarchy to manage abortion clinics?

Why does it necessitate hierarchy?

Feminization of work and endangerment of women through dangerous work were two things I mentioned earlier, though I don't know if I was talking to you or not.

What I'm saying is that the people here aren't Lenins or Stalins. They believe everything about identity that the hippies and other boomers believed, even though those beliefs had horrible consequences. That is liberalism. SJWs are to the left of the boomers - although I haven't mentioned them or even thought of them before you brought it up.

Mass immigration is capitalism in action. "Let's bring in people who can get around the laws designed to protect our workers so we can pay them more cheaply!" Communist societies have more trouble trying to keep people from leaving the grey and ambition-destroying shitholes they become.


I don't think people are going to want to become abortionists just by chance if it doesn't pay much better than easier and less gruesome jobs, so they would have to be forced into doing it to fulfill the demand for abortions, or there would be waiting lists longer than the human gestation period to get an abortion.

Which beliefs are you referring to?


Tell me more about the beliefs of an entire generation and how we share them.

Here, have this webm for free, courtesy of international socialism

Attached: HAPPYVID.webm (640x360, 3.73M)

non sequitur
fashies will always believe they are being victimized in some nutty conspiratorial way, the far left does not pretend life is fair

Egalitarianism in regards to different identity groups.

If black men are raping white women far more than white men are raping black women, and then capitalists try to show us a rosy view of interracial relationships in every other TV advertisement, then yeah, we're being victimized. Victimization is something that happens. You stop being a victim by retaliating and if necessary obliterating the perpetrator. White people aren't at that stage yet.

The entire reason this board is popular is because we want to get away from these people. You are just assuming this is true with no factual basis; the liberal types that come here from Reddit are an unwelcome plague.

crime is not ideological, you fucking retard, it is a symptom of societal decay.
besides, violent crime in the US has rapidly declined for decades despite the average Zig Forumstard believing it is rising exponentially because muh scary ferguson riots

This is the same logic that feminazis use to "prove" that men are inherently violent and dangerous, and that women are being victimized by them. The crime statistics they use to back this claim up are true, but the judgments they derive from them are nonsense.

What horrible consequences of egalitarianism are you referring to then?

Attached: freud.jpg (330x363, 52K)

Social liberalism is basically "as egalitarian as I can be in regards to every group according to the norms of the period of time". Whether a commie has 2010's SJW beliefs about equality or 1970's Civil Rights beliefs about equality does not make much difference to me.

Crime would be much lower if there were no blacks or mexicans in the nation, especially violent, and gang oriented crime. Gangs should be especially rejected given that the gang is the primitive model of the nation, and our country is basically tolerating ur-nations within our midst.

Men ARE inherently violent and dangerous. The ability to do violence (either to humans or non-human animals) and co-operate in a violent group of men is the source of all traits regarded as masculine.

Detroit, Michigan would be the closest one to me. Flint, Michigan is a bit down the way.

Tell me more about child sexuality, good rabbi.

Zig Forums is eternally blue-pilled

Attached: b842937944b4786fb317bad63f5ae12eaec18658d85dfc2121b0da575270fa5b.png (1046x1047, 118.2K)

Of course we're all the same to you, but this is meaningless to us.
Gangs are tolerated? You live in a fucking fantasy world, and state violence against people that have not committed any sort of crime (which is, believe it or not, the vast majority of them, even among nonwhites) is no less criminal in my book.
This contradicts your implied belief that whites are inherently peaceful and civilized. Either crime is natural or it is not, you cannot have both.

Was nice bantering with you NEETs, but I have to go to work now.

I'm sure violent nigs had nothing to do with all the "wealth" moving out either, eh? If a city is majority black, it's going to be worse off economically and criminally than the surrounding white cities. I'm sure there are a few exceptions, but this is how it is.

I gotta go so I'll be quick about this and not very detailed.
First two things you said were nonsensical or overly literal. The last thing is not something I believe or something anyone believes. Whites are great at violence. Crime and punishment are both natural. If you grapple with what I'm saying instead of trying to come up with snarky polemics about it you might grow.

I'll talk more in a few hours when I'm back from work if I'm not banned for lyfe.

White flight is only a small part of it, and happened before the city totally went to shit. Detroit is a mess of political corruption and failed industry, the better-off residents left because they have no reason to stay while the black populace is much less financially capable of this in general.
These days, black residents are also making their own exodus to the suburbs.

There is no such thing as "overly literal". We are not idealists.
Then there is no point about complaining about statistics that are derived from the actions of unrelated individuals, not ideology.

>Why do self-proclaimed "anarcho-communists" want to defend government-funded on-demand abortions? How would abortion be handled in an "anarcho-communist" society twitter.com/AnarchoVet/status/1005535531592081408
Most ancoms are liberals.
Sounds like a pretty good deal to me. Fuck off.

Why hasn’t the OP been banned yet?

Am I banned? Lets' find out!