I need fake quotes memes of various thinkers, left and right. I'm high on these. Thank you.
I need fake quotes memes of various thinkers, left and right. I'm high on these. Thank you
Other urls found in this thread:
imichurin.narod.ru
marxists.org
twitter.com
A classic.
can't forget this classic
this but unironically
one of these is real
guess which one
The Marx one is absolutely real
remember gaber glober did the jews
allegedly, the second one is real lmao. what was up with Stalin and scribbling on stuff? He scribbled on some stuff from Lysenko too.
This man is a legend.
That's dum tho
stalin must have realized he was going full retard on lysenkoism but just not given a fuck
Trofim Denisovich Lysenko's life and work have been much analyzed and discussed in the world's literature. It is well known that Lysenko is notorious and has been regarded as a charlatan. Less well known is that he once made greater contributions to Biology and has been misunderstood in some aspects. In this paper, Lysenko's contributions to plant physiology, genetics, agro-biology and evolutionary biology are briefly reviewed. His tragedies and mistakes, such as mixing science and politics, denying the existence of genes, failing to build up suitable scientific collectives for the metabolism-biochemical studies of heredity, as well as his theoretical one-sidedness, are also discussed, thus reconsidering the case of Lysenko from a comprehensive and objective viewpoint.
In 1977, the famous British cytogeneticist and evolutionist, C. D. Darlington, asked a question: was Lysenko a charlatan? In his book The Lysenko Affair, Joravsky [1970] depicted Lysenko as a pseudo-scientist from the beginning: “The painful truth is that Lysenko was never seriously involved in any genuine scientific problem”. Roll-Hansen [1985] argued that Joravsky did not recognize the considerable difference between Lysenko's credentials in plant physiology and in genetics, by pointing out that Lysenko's work in genetics may well be considered pseudo-science as a whole. Until recently, Lysenko's work in genetics was still regarded as charlatanism and fraud (Hagemann [2002]; Hossfeld and Olsson [2002]; Wobus and Schubert [2002]; Muller-Hill [2002]; Witkin [2002]), though Flegr [2002] correctly pointed out that Lysenko was partly right. As a matter of fact, Vavilov once placed a high value on Lysenko's work: “Lysenko is a careful and highly talented researcher. His experiments are irreproachable” (Soyfer [1989]), though he later regarded Lysenko as “an angry man” (Darlington [1977]). The respected British biologist, J.B.S. Haldane, before his death, passed the fairest judgment on Lysenko. He believed that Lysenko was a very fine biologist and some of his ideas were right, though he also realized that some of Lysenko's ideas were wrong and badly wrong (Haldane [1964]). Frankly speaking, Lysenko's own contributions had been outstanding, and had covered several important fields of biology, whereas his mistakes were also evident. In this paper, I try to distinguish between Lysenko's rightness and wrongness, and make a concrete analysis of his contributions to biology and his tragedies, thus reconsidering him from a comprehensive and objective viewpoint.
TPUSA is too easy I know
Can we post actually real quotes that sound fake but are unironically true?
That Mao quote isn't fake, but it's retardedly taken out of context. Here's what he actually said:
marxists.org
I think he should've just said "To read too many reactionary books is harmful"
IM AS FAT ASS REDPILLED ALPHA MALE - no bullshit
Oh wait he actually said that
Charlie kirk -charlie Kirk
(Charlie kirk) (Charlie kirk)
That's what i said, the quotes i posted aren't fake they just sound fake when someone looks at them firsthand, and yes that deng quote is real.
Yeah sorry, I meant the quote is real but not like most people think
10/10 Burgerfags wouldn't recognize this quote
Whenever there is in any country, uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right.
t. t jeff
No, hes literally right. To read too many of ANY books is harmful. It is simply bad for the mind. Direct evidence of this are Zig Forums posters that are retarded but will quote three hundred books by people youve never heard of.
Oh man, people on Zig Forums would totally believe the right one. They still think ⛏️rotsky invented the word racism.
Fuck niggers. -Che
Oh wait!
I lost it
bad b8
this man is right
knowledge is never wasted on something, you never know when you might need it.
anyway, I doubt their retardation stems from reading too many books. correlation =/= causation
1st image was real tho.
This ones actually a real quote, I believe.
as?
source?
wtf i love fascism now
clever, very clever
"I'm fat because I'm protesting society" - also no bullshit
First one is fucking gold