Writing an Essay for my Russian History 1905-1945 class...

Writing an Essay for my Russian History 1905-1945 class. How do I prove to my teacher that the defendants in the Moscow Trials were guilty? She has said I'm not allowed to use Grover Furr or The Finnish Bolshevik as a source.

Attached: 211.png (500x500, 56.01K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mltheory.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/the-moscow-trials-part-1-the-investigation/
mltheory.wordpress.com/2017/07/12/1934/
mltheory.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/moscow-trials-part-3-the-great-purge/
quora.com/Did-Josip-Broz-Tito-assassinate-Joseph-Stalin/answer/Chuck-Garen
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Use Ludo Martens as a source and Bertolt Brecht to prove how in ter innocence they were actually guilty. You can quote Zizek's In Defense of Lost Causes.
Or you could not focus on how they were guilty, but rather present it as a result of an historical process led by a series of contractions that needed to somehow be worked upon.
Also Getty has a book the "stalinist" terror in which he talks about what the people thought about it. Sheila Fitzpatrick as well.

Use the sources used by The Finnish Bolshevik:

mltheory.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/the-moscow-trials-part-1-the-investigation/
mltheory.wordpress.com/2017/07/12/1934/
mltheory.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/moscow-trials-part-3-the-great-purge/

Attached: BestShip.jpg (700x608, 88.54K)

Since when are random youtubes credible sources?

Attached: confused.png (370x320, 9.98K)

Since the information age started, user. Most people get their understanding of politics from e-celeb.

The question of whether they were "innocent" or "guilty" is irrelevant. Any steps taken to protect a revolution are justified a priori. The real question is what the punishment should be. If one is indeed innocent but one day fears they may be thought of otherwise, their heart is not with the revolution, it is with apprehension. All dedicated revolutionaries should know that their lives belong to it, whether falsely condemned or truthfully, and should never fear a trial. The real ones meet their fate like Saint-Just, with confidence and even an arrogance.

Who the hell cites either of them? They're not the primary sources of information. Just take their sources and rephrase their theses. You must also take care to moderate the phrases to not sound like an apologist, they'll downgrade you otherwise. Just play along.

That doesn’t make any sense, by that logic you can arrest and execute literally anybody whether or not they have actually done anything wrong. Steps taken to protect the revolution are fine, but only if they actually target counter revolutionary elements, otherwise it’s just random killing.

Attached: 1512691837358.jpg (448x398, 136.4K)

The problem here is how to moderate the phrases. If I was him I would write like Michael Parenti.

Here's a hot take. the defenders are mostly innocent and the persecutors were the guilty ones. This led to Stalin's assassination in a couple of decades.

*bourgeoisie propaganda intensifies*

Attached: leftpol side.jpg (585x707, 255.83K)

d-did you ask him if you could use FinnBol as a source?

Attached: 1403941636800.jpg (233x270, 20.14K)

obviously. she says he isn't acceptable and says shit like like Synder and Kotkin would be okay. fucking hate that bitch.

Sow him the secret pages Leon send to Bachunin were they talk about helping nazis

Why was Stalin poisoned in the first place?

Holy shit user this should be basic knowledge. Like I support Stalin and ☭TANKIE☭s but at a certain point you have to stop. Both Furfag and Mongolian Larper are unreliable information regurgitators and memes. You may as well cite Jason "Fuck Theory" U-durr-hurr. Did you actually ask that? If you did go whack yourself on the back with a stick, you should unironically feel ashamed.

Analysis here: quora.com/Did-Josip-Broz-Tito-assassinate-Joseph-Stalin/answer/Chuck-Garen

I've never seen worse revisionism.

Any more of that sweet sweet ad hominum?

Hominum? Where is that on the periodic table?

Are you autistic?

it's like red liberals have literally no arguments.
oh wait, they don't.

Attached: 17ffeb964c7178c8d77ebb8e9880d534f55fceee122615aadb96306fa61e4701.png (202x243, 15.18K)

A random small youtuber on the internet is not a credible source. You have to be severely autistic to ask if they are in real life, to a teacher.

user, I think you might be a bit retarded. He was talking to OP, open your eyes next time unless YOU want to be on the Moscow trials.

Attached: fc4.jpg (600x800, 62.42K)

This is wrong on her part, still, just cite the sources that Furr and co. use.

Furr is far more factual than Snyder but the stupid bitch would allow that.

Kotkin

Snyder

Thank's for the Advice, i'll do this.

Why is your teacher so concerned with the Moscow trials?

Because they teach a college class Russian History 1905-1945?

damn, does this mean that PB&J is a scholar now?

Attached: dab_emoji.png (427x211, 104.78K)

I actually used unruhe as a source and won.

woah really makes me think

Just imagine COINTELPRO times a thousand and you'll understand what Stalin and the Bolsheviks had to deal with. Infiltrators and traitors are an inevitable issue all serious political organizations have to deal with. Stalin dealt with them.

bump for dumb ass OP

Except implying that anybody who opposed Stalin was a closet reactionary is ridiculous, especially when you consider that most of the supposed traitors were veterans of major socialist struggles. Something tells me that if Tito had been genuinely reactionary he wouldn't have killed Nazis and Ustase in droves.

Attached: 183.JPG (620x419, 195.07K)

Also there is no evidence(outside shitty testimones)that bucharin,Leon and Hitler worked together to destroy USSR

Didn't a lot of the "evidence" against people who were later purged turn out to be German forgery? Was Stalin 4D chess'd into killing off all hist experienced officers and administrators?

Your teacher is not your friend. He(she) is your class enemy as far as it's in the classroom. Stop pandering to them.

ACQUITTED BY THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION

Attached: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.jpg (1200x1000, 372.83K)

your advice cucked OP out of a college education, LMAO.

This was the theory back in the day
But most historians i have met say stalin was just trying to kill his rivals
Tho they are many theories

Attached: adams.jpg (634x961, 797.8K)

Attached: bushie.jpg (500x328, 25.81K)

Attached: imperialist.jpg (768x637, 339.6K)

Uh… user…