What do you think should be done about liberal authors who include secret messages in their works which can be...

what do you think should be done about liberal authors who include secret messages in their works which can be interpretted in an anti communist way?

For Example, Revaz Gabriadze wrote the ostensibly anti-capitalist movie Kin Dza Dza about telepathic aliens whose entire vocabulary consists of the words "Koo and "Kyuu", which bears a striking similarity to the initials of K.U. Chernenko, which is obviously subversive
Then there is the Chinese Opera: Ha Rui Dismissed from Office, about a Ming era official who fearlessly carried the complaints of the people to the emperor at the detriment of his career. sure, on the surface it seems like a timeless story of civic duty, but consider what happens if you replace the emperor with Mao, and Hai Rui with someone like Peng Dehuai or Adolf Hitler. Now the play becomes counterrevolutionary libel. Rightfully, the author of this play spent the rest of his life in Prison for this.
Speaking of China, we can also look at the works of Lu Xun: Although he was an supporter of cultural reform and supported the communists, it's as if he looked into the future, and his stories describing Qing fun actually drew unwanted parallels with the later Maoist policies. unfortunately, he had already died of TB in the 30s and couldn't be punished, but thankfully certain works of his were banned from circulation.
The most dangerous of clandestine authors might be science fiction authors. The Strugatsky brothers are famous for writing novels such as "Hard to Be a God" and "Roadside Picnic". both had to be thoroughly censored prior to publication, but still, a close reading reveals numerous unflattering commentaries about Marxism; In the former, a human from the communist future visits an alien planet stuck in the middle ages, and is forbidden from intervening, since their society must naturally evolve through feudalism, then capitalism, then socialism despite the abhorant cruelty and oppression he witnesses. he rejects this, but it suggests that while the main character is on the side of the aliens, Marxism may not be not.

How can a revolutionary government deal with liberal authors who are able to conceal their antagonism this way? it makes me shake thinking of how many liberals might have published secret anti-communist literature that were never caught.

Attached: x1080-Qh8.jpg (1510x1080, 244.23K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hai_Rui_Dismissed_from_Office
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin-dza-dza!#Video
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roadside_Picnic#Origins_and_Soviet_censorship
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peng_Dehuai#The_Lushan_Conference
youtube.com/watch?v=11sMDQIgggA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Are you retarded? Nothing. What is even the case for this? You interpret it to be anti-communist? And so what? Not everyone is a Communist, boohoo, lets arrest them.
Yes, that is what you should be angry about. Literally soy boy stereotype tier, you are angry about POTENTIALLY anticommunist books instead of the actual forces that collapse revolutions.

who is the biggest enemy of communism? Kulaks? Muslims? Tartars? Nazis? Americans? homosexuals? Think again, it's science fiction authors!

OP is a retard, or pretending to be one, but this is exactly the same reasoning actual censors in China and the soviet union used. Mao literally sperged out over a private letter because he was a three kingdom's brainlet who thought a reference comparing him to legendary hero Zheng Fei was making fun of him and began attacking him publicly.

Probably a bait thread but Strugatskys' novels are far more anti-bureaucrat than they are anti-Marxist. They are generally anti-capitalist in nature and mostly reflect on the red tape present in Soviet society of that time (already heavily revisionist). I literally read through Roadside Picnic today and it is pretty apolitical aside from criticizing capitalist greed. Only mention of Russia in it can be considered positive: the Russian Zone is well-guarded while Western Zones are open to profiteers

Honestly criticizing real shortcomings of existing socialism is only a good thing, as long as it is not propagandizing reaction as the "solution"

Wow, are you telling me that leaders make mistakes! God am i amazed at the theoretical contributions in this thread.
Proofs would be cool though, that would actually be a good thing from this thread.

Roadside Picnic got censored a fuckload though. what was in the intended draft that got cut for being subversive? I haven't read the so called uncensored version they published.

The last thing that communism needs is another great number of apparatchiks in the vein of OP. bait thread

Proof? I thought all of the works and events were easy enough to search? Do you dispute that they exist?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hai_Rui_Dismissed_from_Office
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin-dza-dza!#Video
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roadside_Picnic#Origins_and_Soviet_censorship
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peng_Dehuai#The_Lushan_Conference

As far as I know Roadside Picnic just took a long time to be published, but the text wasn't changed that much (russian wiki says the censored version removed some obscenity and added materialist explanations to Zone anomalies, but not much else). I might have both old and modern printings of the book, I should check what differs.