What right-wing philosophers/politicos do you respect?

What right-wing philosophers/politicos do you respect?

Personally, I think that Hans Hermann-Hoppe and Nick Land are both interesting ideologues.

Attached: 2ff1nc.jpg (500x322, 30.06K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=s4y_hbRH2fc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I only feel sorry for the father of right wing thought: Satan himself. The rest of them can join him in hell for all I care.

Disgusting meme, alt right trying their best to appeal to Marxists is a legitimate threat to the barely breathing left

if you are interested in right libertarians, try Robert Nozick

I've heard Zizek is a fan of Carl Schmitt, haven't read him yet though.

Attached: hobbes3.jpg (225x225 9.39 KB, 8.37K)

Also, William Blackstone

Attached: william blackstone.jpg (1024x1288, 183.39K)

Kaczynski really wasn't right wing in any sense, he was fully anti capitalist without being "turd position", he really didn't like leftists. He has more in common with explicitly anti civ leftcoms and post left anarchists if anything, or possibly with the likes of Pol Pot or anprim's as well(even though he ruthlessly criticized anprim's in one of his writings)

Heidegger if that counts

Please don't put that brainlet on that list. He's only notable because he was good at writing. His arguments were often consistently terrible and he died like a fat bitch and will be forgotten like every other reactionary that has ever held a judicial post. Also Hobbes wasn't a reactionary or really even right wing.

smh, you lot are so far removed from the halls of power that you have no appreciation for good legal philosophy. Scalia's opinions were absolute fire.

I'm sure you know this, but he was a cathcuck royalist during the English Civil War. Leviathan was essentially a screed against the parliamentarians. Some people trace the left-right dichotomy only as far as the French Revolution, but I think we can extrapolate it a bit further, at least to the English Civil War.


His take on alienation and modern decadence seemed extremely rightwing to me, bordering on fascistic. Very distinct from any leftist tradition I am familiar with. Maybe I need to read some anti-civ leftcoms.

The Alt Right And Far Left are gonna breed one day and create some Nick Fuentes/Muke antichrist baby who is gonna destroy the earth through convincing Liberals that they should invade China

Attached: A3D6A6EA-4B04-4AB8-993B-7F9CE9151DCB.jpeg (400x400, 38.06K)

Well, Kai murros used to be a Maoist

Ted Kaczynski is ok, tho Jacques ellul is better and is very underrated.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (220x147, 48.59K)

Carl Schmitt is absolutely essential reading wether you're a rightist or a leftist


memes

Attached: 1294.jpg (291x425, 19.45K)

Evola, though he is almost like a caricature to me

*sigh* that’s probably the only way out of this mess the bourg see

Stalin was a fan of pic related

Attached: Dostoevsky.jpg (3200x4000, 3.7M)

"far left"
no, just left

I hate him with a passion. He is worse than Ayn Rand and i consider her one of the worst creatures ever. Hoppe is a complete and utter piece of shit. He jumps between idiocy defying all common sense and logic and deliberate amorality/degeneracy.

Attached: rage 4.jpg (396x409, 156.8K)

Hoppe is a fantastic example of why libertarians turn to outright racism. Also he is strangely fixated on homosexuality for some strange reason.

really makes you ponder

Attached: fascism.png (640x360 227.29 KB, 231.73K)

pick one and only one

Attached: 1c87ba93fbb962a1a4f2e1d5c85c29c417fa4135fcc92528ae2b340de1fcb8e3.png (820x420, 173.74K)

What did the capitalists mean by this leftypol?

Attached: 4D878131-1C1D-4021-97CA-F817ED5A82E1.jpeg (2047x1325 273.41 KB, 607.24K)

Part of them are just milking dem hate clicks and others are shilling rainbow capitalism.
Also they don't want you to complain. "Check your privilege" is no different from boomer memes such as "It's easy to get a good job"

Any anons partial to Houellebecq ITT?

T.S. Eliot

They mean "we want to divide and conquer the proletariat using liberal identity politics". And you may have swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

this is just internet journalism in general, same as right wing news forums crying about the dems becoming communists. It onyl exists to get clicks.

Yep and part of it is exactly making left wingers even more divided against each other
Which only makes the lefties who mix Marx and modern idpol to think
And not one of us actually wins in the end, while porky rubs his little hooves together and snorts

Attached: 3304A2EA-E640-4BDA-ACCE-A05DC81D9B4A.jpeg (800x1200, 245.95K)

Everybody is ffs, he's the GOAT

Literally the only thing wrong with Lenin is that he hated Dostoyevsky.

Attached: 1532578053703.jpg (313x500, 44.51K)

it most definitely does

Naw.. People here want to invade Russia first. That won't change now for at least 40 years. The only people who don't are communists and Trump fanatics.

This is correct. It is a very serious threat IMO. I do think we need to take the right's considerations into account though, and formulate a platform that can appeal to social conservatives, takes the issue of Zionist subversion and hegemony seriously. and is critical of democracy.

True long shlong is a decent content creator. He doesn't understand Marx though. I would like to have a beer with him.

Braving Ruin was okay. Too much of a whiny little bitch at times to be respectable.

The guys at AltRight.com politics honestly provide better analysis of current events then most mainstream sources, although this is a low bar. I listen to their show pretty frequently for the realpolitiq, but they are far too petit bourgeois in their mentality to be in any way respectable. The guy who punched Spencer did nothing wrong.

Uncle Ted and Varg are very based and I have the utmost respect for them. I think they are on the right path, but do not understand Marx, and as a result draw some very wrong conclusions.

Adam Smith and David Ricardo of course.


This is the most correct answer.

Attached: 240px-Varg_Vikernes-2.jpg (240x250, 18.81K)

Varg practices what he preaches, something no one else on the right does.

Is Ellul even right wing? Wasn't he something similar to what Tolstoy was, and Marx was one of his main inspirations.

Attached: a3425015700_16.jpg (700x700, 55.9K)

I spent the last few days reading Crime and Punishment because of this thread. Bretty good desu.
I think I'll read The Idiot next.

Attached: dosto pasta.jpg (1170x904, 516.35K)

Confucious, Sorel, Proudhon, Bakunin, Spengler, Plato, Nietszche, Kant (the last one to some degree)

sorry thought this was a general philosophy thread my bad

Scalia’s opinions are “hurrrrr it says in this here dictionary dat dis word means dis thing so looks like not putting all the workers into meat grinders is unconstitutional”

His writings appeal to absolute brainlets

Lenin

Philosophers are brainlets lmao; following what philosophers have to say about anything lmao

THE POINT IS TO CHANGE IT YOU GODDAMN FAGGOTS

Horrible reading of that Marx quote

Yeah what marx really wanted was sectarian infighting and reclining in comfy armchairs while shitposting every day on a north korean virtual gulag.

...

If right-wingers were worthy of respect, they wouldn’t be right-wingers.

I'm Irish but I have to admit Oliver Cromwell was an absolute and total GANGSTER.


Ultimate bourgeois revolutionary. He had some big balls.

Attached: cromwell.jpg (590x288, 24.62K)

Of course. What that quote really means is that we should have sectarian infighting about minuscule stupidities.

Read Adorno' Minima Moralia.

Boris Johnson

How will the right ever recover

Nick Land BTFO'd ancaps forever

Attached: property.png (669x184, 22.01K)

Idk I guess Metaxas, he told Mussolini to go fuck himself. Definitely most based fascist.

…What? That's like the most random pick ever. Why?

I don't even know who that is

Adorno is fascist
t. ==JAZZ GANG==

I don't find it possible to respect any right-wing thinkers. Not even memeing. I've seen this thread multiple times and tried to think of one, but saying that I respect any of them would be lying.

That's understandable, but the way I look at it, if I can't find any worthy atributes related to their politics specifically, I look at things like their courage/personality.
I know many of you will say I'm spooked af, but I still find admirable things like honor, loyalty, and courage. It's pretty much why I believe Metaxas is the most respectable fascist, for standing up to Mussolini and putting up a fight against the germans aswell, which even Hitler ackowledged.

read more

fuck off degenerate

Attached: ezgif-2-3b4a52226e.gif (217x199, 878K)

Of the names you've mentioned only Heidegger is worth of respect

That's just having good taste

This is amongst the gayest writing I have ever looked upon. All those syllables just to say HURR work for land DURR whilst forgetting that the right to homestead, work or not, is older than the idea of private property

I haven't read Schmitt yet but my country has been under a "state of emergency" during the last two years after an ISIS terrorist attack, and the state (including cops ofc) were able to get over the law pretty easily, and made the rules applied in this "state of exception" pretty much permanent. He seems relevant as ever.
Nick Land is a good meme tho

He is arguing the exact opposite you absolute dumbfuck brainlet.

schmitt is great and ties in well with the marxist conception of the state as an instrument of class rule and the idea that in absence of (class) enemies the state and politics itself seize to exist.

Attached: 8a7227c908794aadf33fa45b53ae0c1fe1d2919c2111056e81e72d9d764c31b6.png (705x767, 62.9K)

Hating big words for being big is the hallmark of a dipshit.

go on…

will to power, bro

youtube.com/watch?v=s4y_hbRH2fc

Attached: MV5BMTg5NjQxNjY1MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwODMwMTM2._V1_.jpg (365x450, 37.95K)

Adolf Hitler.

Attached: 6e81f7e02731bd4e8c37b22dd8a5564b1898d817aef9ca5e7766178741ad0df5.png (910x767, 463.52K)

Except eating shit tbh.
Holy shit, why do you even pretend there is anything admireable about that fag?

Kek.
I stopped caring about politics irl a long time ago, though.
It's all a sham.
Humanity is heading towards technocratic subjugation.
And then, eventually, irrelevance.

No u

Good. It's a lot easier when retards keep themselves uninvolved in politics.

Wasn't that dude proved to be dead for years before the punch?

You mean establishment democrats? Practically nobody else wants to go to war with them.

Mencious Moldbug

Nigger what

Attached: reddit toad.jpg (655x527, 48.74K)

Satan in Paradise Lost is objectively a comrade

Nick Fuentes

based baron Evola ofc

Anders Breivik, no one has done more to show how western legalism is an absolute farce than that trolling master fucker
The dude shot like 80 people and now gets free vidya and government subsidized book orders for life

Carl schmitt isnt right wing. Nazis arent right wing. They are radical centrists.

Attached: 951c7a8e0535ec432f9da61fdfb35e0fd1e27976a1852fcf9d4cab16dd572b6f.png (474x711, 90.48K)

Hitler is literally top middle. He was an extreme authortarian centrist. Its not hard to understand, cute profile picture by the way

based

Attached: Ted.jpg (587x700, 81.11K)

i would put kaczynski somewhere in the libertarian right, but i do respect him and his belifes

To add a detail: if true, he would BTFO the left as well, as for communists property proceeds from material transformation in the form of labor rather than sovereignty. The latter would be idealism.

At least he does make the point that anarcho-capitalism is untenable if one regards property as proceeding from sovereignty or production, however.

absolutely based post(s)


this

i don't know about political philosophers, but there are a ton of right-wing authors i enjoy:

dostoevsky
balzac
celine
mishima
knut hamsun

as far as philosophers in general, i'm also a fan of schopenhauer, and i suppose being a sort of eugenicist monarchist, he could be considered right-wing, too, although he was pro-animal rights and opposed to nationalism and slavery, so he's a mixed bag politically. nietzsche is another one. he tries to portray himself as "apolitical", which is partially true because he isn't so much concerned with outward political forms, but ultimately, if you read between the lines of what he wrote, it's clear that he was basically a reactionary liberal. he hated socialism, democracy, woman's rights, saw slavery in some guise as a necessary precondition for the intellectual development of the upper classes, etc. but hardly anyone reads him for his garbage political views.

As an anti-natalist I like Schopenhauer too. He was anti-socialism though.

just like Plato eh. kinda gets the noggin joggin, what if Nietzsche is just Platonism for the elite

But Platonism is already for the elite

rly getin tht nogin jogn

Agreed. Only one I can think of is maybe Machiavelli because of his future influence on republicanism.

What if I play this in reverse?

I call myself a national syndicalist, much is the development I had throughout the years when talking with both communists and socialists, I have defended the continuation of the USSR for the sake of having a duality present that is able to keep the other in check.

The problem of wage slavery is another one that I have read a bit upon mostly from a Nat-Synd perspective but I find myself agreeing a lot of times with either anarchists or socialists when it comes to this point, class colaboration is another topic that I just can't stand, once again there is this great book I read from another National-Syndicalist author that describes the "Bourgeoisie Betrayal" througout the years, from kings and queens to what we have nowadays, it concludes with a phrase that I do believe it is true "Only the rich can afford not being part of a nation", but oh well, call me Nazbol or any other term you might find, I would be more than willing to give you guys the hold of the economy if you allowed said nation to continue on existing, a bit like the Iron Guard did, I don't know… I don't see you exactly as my mortal enemy, nowadays there are bigger problems surrounding capitalism both in China and the US, things that are more important than ideological squabble.

Anyways

I do enjoy Adorno due to the various criticisms he draws upon capitalism and the damage that it does towards tradition, that is why I believe I shouldn't call myself a conservative, I do not look after conserving what is wrong I would much prefer to be a traditionalist. Also jazz is fascism

And Stalin…Well he does explain it quite well why personal liberties are useless when the people are dying in hunger and being constantly exploited and stolen of their value as elements of said nation (I believe you guys would call this alienation?), he seems to also be a great leader that cared about his people and country, even if many sacrifices had to be made her still helped the Russian People.

That is all for now.

Attached: stalin03.jpg (300x225 412.38 KB, 6.1K)

Plato, Hobbes, Locke, Ben Affleck

Junger