I have created a board called >>>/ecopol/ for the discussion of environmental politics. It has become completely overrun by Zig Forums
If you are anprim, communalist, ecosocialist, or just interested in environmental politics, please stop by and post so that this thing doesn't become complete shit even before it gets off the ground
Other urls found in this thread:
8ch.net
8ch.net
twitter.com
>>>Zig Forums would accept you there
what's the board's stance on environmental accelerationism?
I enjoy leftypol more
As in, accelerating capitalism to it's own destruction, which will allow for more environmentally sustainable political systems to emerge in capitalism's rubble?
okay
No, as in accelerating the destruction of the environment as a means of radical population reduction
That idea sounds braindead enough for Zig Forumstards to enjoy. You should try there.
Is this a leftwing view?
There is a posada thread on ecopol right now that might fit in…
I thought you guys supported AnPrim?
link to posadism thread 8ch.net
Not the same guy… but how is that AnPrim?
ecopol needs more anprim posting tbh, someone made a thread dedicated to 'anprim hate' and it's pretty shitty
modern population levels, technical skills, and general sensibilities are not sustainable in an anprim society. a truely successful anprim society would need a massive filter/purge.
so… linkola-level?
Exactly
Not the hero we wanted, but the one we deserve desu
lmao some nazi asshole just created '/epol/' because they got btfo'd
Anprim, "environmentalism" and deep ecology are reactionary drivel. Read Rafiq.
See https:// thecharnelhouse.org/2011/04/22/man-and-nature-revised-complete
This is why anprim is for lissencephalic morons.
...
There's a much better chance for human survival and environmental protection with continued technological progression and inventing more efficient ways of energy production. We're too far gone to go back to some idealistic hunter-gatherer society and even if we did, the human race would surely be extinct much faster in the case of some natural catastrophe (supervolcano eruption, asteroid, etc.) and so would most of the planet's species.
What to do, when a ship carrying a hundred passengers suddenly capsizes and only one lifeboat? When the lifeboat is full, those who hate life will try to load it with more people and sink the lot. Those who love and respect life will take the ship’s axe and sever the extra hands that cling to the sides of the boat.
...
...
...
enironmentalism is the only idpol that matters though
Anprim and deep ecology are stupid and reactionary yes, but Rafiq's muh let's replace all nature is pretty stupid as well
what the literal fuck are you talking about? how is any of that implied in what I'm saying?
You described humans as essentially cancerous growths when that's just a byproduct of capitalism. As energy production becomes steadily much more efficient and we have greater means to protect our surrounding environments through technology, there will be progressively less exploitation of it.
Yeah, humans have a fantastic track record of making things better for the planet as their populations grow and technology becomes cheaper.
Something tells me mental illness was far lower in the USSR then California or New York and it's not just because of x amount of people or buildings produce x amount of mental illness.
I swear 99% of all you anprim/environmentalist idiots are just reactionaries. And yes there's obviously nothing wrong with protecting the environment but this misuse of data and >humans are tumors >humans can't allocate resources efficiently enough to not have a world wide genocide (which will probably save more White Europeans of course because they pollute less) is neo-ractionary garbage
DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM
Anprim, deep ecology, radical veganism etc etc are just modern offshoots of romanticism
most environmentalism is a fascist front.
yes we shouldn't be polluting shit and leaving giant landfills that never go away and we should have clean water, but not because of some romanticist bullshit view of the purity of nature.
it's telling that the first and only answer you get from environmentalists is forced austerity in vital resources and the pressure to kill off people as soon as possible, while there's no question about why we're producing so much needless shit or the existence of gross disparities in wealth just because of some high-status peoples' need for prestige.
It's delusional to believe a socialist society will be free of environmental and social issues. For example, I'm sure you see yourself consuming animal products in a socialist society, but the consumption of these foods are a huge burden on the environment and also public health.
/thread/
Stop with the hippie bullshit, physically remove communists and join us in the profit driven history of the creation of a cosmic collective. intelligence.
P.S.: shame this chan doesn't have a nickland flair.