A political system that has only failed is better than the most successful political regime in human history

Attached: download.jpg (1000x728, 67.61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/KgymF4oHztY
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Who are you quoting? No one here is saying that Nazism is better than Soviet Socialism, we actually believe the opposite

A thousand year reich only lasted a decade or so, thought.

Attached: 1478119236627.jpg (641x641, 44.35K)

...

You niggers really never learn do you

Attached: 8de.png (1198x1200, 756.79K)

to be honest, this one was quite funny. I mean

a political system that has only failed is better than the most successful political regime in human history

did he use google translate, because this is quite a funny quote.

I suppose you're right. You are the best poster here anyways, so what the fuck.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1801x94 12.66 KB, 23.28K)

Everyone says stupid shit every once in a while.

That russian fag and you always jump infront of the bus to defend liberals tho… For some reason.

every once in a while is one thing, but when every other post is a complete dogshit take it's kinda hard to call someone "the best poster here"

Maybe becouse we like Decambrists, Marx, and Groven Furr?

Everyone I don't like is tactic the right uses to, just go check turning point usa page.
youtu.be/KgymF4oHztY

Attached: Karl Marx the Liberal.png (500x570, 155.32K)

I might have went overboard yesterday, but nowadays term liberal has pretty broad meaning, and trough out history there have been many great people who are identified as liberals. Such is the case today. Calling everyone that they dislike liberals is what charlie kirk, ben shapiro and other scumbags do, and the left should drop it ,

Attached: 44bb3685ef43445f9e68f4929fc0dfef.jpg (788x597, 94.89K)

Marx and Furr aren't liberals, and the Decembrists were liberals in a feudal society where being a bourgeois liberal was objectively progressive. Today liberals simply uphold the status quo. They're bad not because they are progressive, they're bad because they aren't progressive ENOUGH. It is not necessary to defend liberals in order to hate on reactionary retards.

Lmao what? You are a strange kind of anarchist. What kind of anarchist likes marx and grover furr?
You are probably the less retarded anarchist on this board if anything, but something your exploit are really strange.
Like the whole comparing roberspierre to renzi yesterday.
About that. You didn't tell me what's harmless about spd, renzi, macron and hollande

He's a Anarchist but he recognises that a lot of the shit said about state socialists like stalina England the USSR are bullshit

Most of them, I'd hope

Took me a while, but I finally found this miracle.

The point is that right wingers call them liberals. Just like in the video.

Liberals are not hive mind.


That;s why I often say, that leftists should reach out to them rather than call everyone they dislike liberal.

I am non-secterian, and I like grover furr because he debunks the myths normies accuse all leftist

Its similar to Stalin-Kruschev, Mao-Deng. There are various kinds of people in the world.

I critically support a lot nations including Iran, DPRK and others, I am very critical of their governments however.

Bakunin actually translated Marx into Russian language.

Why should I reach out a demographic that is perfectly fine with the world right now? They just want more rainbow shit here and there.
I'd rather reach out to right wingers (non meme Zig Forums autist) but people who recognize that there is something wrong right now and is bring all too shit. I know for a fact that trendy hipsters are less willing to listen to me than black shirt fascist (I live in italy where they are a thing).
Again you'll find out that most of these people hate us because of the liberals and propaganda that compare us to them. If you reach out for liberals even more we lose a demographic who's just misguided as shit.
The historian refer to the italian wokers who bought into the whole anti capitalist thing as fascist proles. They are more common than liberal proles who tbh seem non existent

Capital Vol. 1, right? Must've been strenuous work.

Like I said yesterday, there are pretty woke groups on facebook which gives me hope.


Do they fallow turning point usa and see pic related every day?

Hmmm..I guess it's just different in every country.

Attached: 28167343_1586482034733840_7546661363952250375_n.jpg (957x960, 107.72K)

Told you I'm not a fucking american.
Fascist are not only petty bougie

Basically get off of the internet for a second. Also the fact that they are equating warren to socialism makes me hate warren and the people who don't do enough to distance themself from these characters even more

May you've been on facebook, but the experience have been the opposite for me.

Attached: 1c47b5d483659c8b04b662ea012e6a6e78c70a7d05860a41ef2fa31da2beef19.gif (500x364, 190.82K)

In the U.S., I think there are a lot of "liberal proletariat" but they often work in the urban service-sector and share similar social views to the urban bourgeoisie.

Proletariat does not = industrial labor. It includes that but it is fundamentally a class position.

The U.S. situation is weird because you have two bourgeois parties that are concentrated in different industries. The Democrats among urban "knowledge" industries, tech, academia, NGOs, and the supporting service sector (think bartenders). The Republicans, among rural and exurban industries like manufacturing, resource extraction, land and real-estate developers, small business owners, etc.

The proles are split in supporting the representatives of the bourgeoisie in both parties. Ultimately, what should happen (but won't) is the conservative oil-field worker and the liberal coffee barista uniting and sending the bourgeoisie in both parties into the guillotine.

Go fuck yourselves.

Attached: v56fv8j0lie01.jpg (2448x3264, 644.64K)