Why is anarchist so prevalent among hispanics?

Why is anarchist so prevalent among hispanics?

In South America at least, MLs are just dumbasses getting involved in bourgeois politics and leftcoms don't even exist.

Attached: anarchist.jpg (312x445, 63.4K)

It's almost like they went there after they lost the war in Spain or something.

Left-Communism: A White Disorder

It was brought by European immigrants in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, just like in the US. Also .

Is it? I always thought Trots were big in latin america. Do latin american anarchists have any good or interesting characteristics/history/theory/praxis peculiar to the region?

since when are italians white?

There are the Zapatistas, other than them I can't think of a real anarchist guerrilla movement

I'm hispanic (from South America) and I'm not an anarchist.

Since when are italians hispanics?

The Zapatistas aren't anarchist.

dunno
was just kidding but it's just weird when you're european and know all that regional racist shit going down and americans talk about "whites" like it's a thing

hispanics are into communism and che and stuff

Rigid caste systems tend to provoke distaste for the idea of taking the systems over for the benefit of the lower classes rather than obliterating the entire thing.

Gonna make an uneducated guess and say anarchism fits more closely to the lower population density and isolated self ruling native communities than ML, which fits industrialized/densely populated areas (europe, russia proper, china proper) better.

Also the fact that spain has a large history of anarchism probably helps. Anarchist music and literature in spanish would seem much more prominent as a result, compared to marxist literature which is more prominent germanic and slavic countries.

Posadas was an Argentinean.

How many Guevarist, or any ML, parties are there in Latin America? How many of them are still a threat to their respective nation's state?

Since when are parties a threat to the State?

because they don't understand what anarchism actually entails and think it'll work in their benefit.

Attached: 8 year old veteran.jpg (800x559, 103.82K)

...

my take, this in part, also because the government is usually very corrupt, as well as the armed forced, especially local police, but also feds and military. For ages the politicians have claimed that they will solve corruption, never happened of course. This creates a deep mistrust of power structures. It is more likely, it feels, that the vanguard will be corrupt and serve their interests than actually strive to implement socialism. We also get some American propaganda, at least where I'm from, about the failures of the Soviet Union. The apparently corrupt party comes to no surprise to Latin countries. Basically, the idea that power structures inevitably lead to corruption given Latin American culture.

their lack of understanding is multi-faceted

Anarchism has always been popular where corruption is rampant. I think Marx or Engels said that somewhere, too.

Attached: 5260e8eb1306031b6de75162279a2ca95cca97c8572bf4621ca1fd537ad8a07a.jpg (500x508, 52.12K)

a lot of hispanics are descendants of aztecs/mayans so there might be something genetic behind their desire for chaos and sacrifice

Attached: anarchists.jpg (720x605, 69.81K)

^this. Still.


That's wherever capitalism is.


The right can't meme

sounds like a fucking utopia to me.

lol your entire continent is undergoing a massive right populist surge and you have the gall to call American's racists.

Well, in Mexico, it was the right wing that was always pushing for centralization (Santa Anna, Conservative support for the French Invasion, the Porfiriato to an extent), while the liberals and peasants since the war of independence were trying to break away from the central colonial government.