Do you support Sargon in his fight against the alt-right?

Do you support Sargon in his fight against the alt-right?

Attached: SARGON.jpg (349x340, 34.85K)

yes, we should heavily arm both sides and hope it escalates

Pictured: Sargon owning the alt-right with FACTS and REASON

Attached: sargon.jpg (1529x1310, 484.24K)

Also spoiler this image plz mods I forgot lol.
Also like 40 libs were owned during this event, too, just so ya'll know Sargon is kickin' ass and takin' names and def not just a pseudointellectual wanksock for neo-nazis.

You forgot to sign it.

Attached: 1f7669cb470e5b9eeb6af718558fc8d137eab0e720c2fbaf6f8f04daf3a24430 (1).jpg (1529x1310, 369.22K)

Ah! I see you're a fan of my work! I was trying to keep a low profile, but a true fan always knows!

Hes the lesser evil but i draw the line in supporting only left from the center like succdems

I thought sargon's audience was alt-right though.

American "conservatives" have hard time to distinguish between libertarianism and conservatism so many alt-righters supported him even if hes a classical liberal. Now they are finally realizing he doesnt care about le jew meme or white ethnostate so they feel like he betrayed them.

Sargon is a sinking ship not worth supporting ever slightly.

I love sargon because he hates niggers, just like I do

You're wrong on both accounts. A lot of alt righters were part of gamergate and most of them still hold a grudge against him for being a parasite. He also spammed a lot of gay interracial porn at random altrighters on Twitter back in early 2017. He even got permabanned because he refused to mark his posts as NSFW

/ourguy/
let's save sargon guys

is this board's average Autism Level getting smaller or am i just imagininging things?

t. d&c Zig Forumstard
We need to save sargon

>>>Zig Forums

You've got no foresight, sargon's liberalist movement and his 20 year plan is going to save the left

Did you forget where you are? (You) and classical liberals will get the bullet

...

He's not even afaik. He appears to be a neo-liberal apologist who just works on the same (mostly wrong) assumptions about the actual classical liberals to justify an attitude that's ultimately conservative and economically revisionist. He hides behind "classical liberal" because nobody knows what it means and it gives him a "liberal that I like" niche with his fellow reactionaries who essentially believe the same shit anyway.

Of course a dirty collectivist misunderstands liberalism. Have you even read Locke?