Capitalist innovation thread. Because we all know that this is the greatest system producing the greatest results...

just watch Kickstart Crap

it's the new OBEY

can Supreme implement UBI?

I like the bootleg version better.
SLURPMEME

Attached: flatev.webm (640x270 826.69 KB, 4.92M)

Fuck off idpol

actually kill yourself. as a black person I'm completely offended that you self righteous white people constantly have to patronize coonery in my culture for the sake of "diversity'. you people are the enemy of mankind.

Most software belongs in this thread.
Most software is either
a). identical in the actually important parts of what it does to shit that existed in the 80s and 90s, and the only reason its around is because a firm shilled hard enough to get people to use their shit they control instead of other shit some other firm controlls(or open systems no single party controlls).
Or
b). only necessary because of the gross inefficiency and complexity added to the landscape of actually used software by a).
real advances in hardware were used to do the same things less efficiently and then solve the problems that created inefficiently in most cases. obviously certain things that would not have been possible with more limited hardware lie outside of this, like video games with gud grafix, or being able to watch high resolution video, but for most common tasks one may use a computer for its true.

I can post general capitalist society stuff

Attached: d5d1326721e27df5bec1d30ad9090644e99dff4a60cf3b3e47e1d81e9d950a7d.jpeg (1024x672 74.55 KB, 584.56K)

Attached: a4014d675dadb498b4aed4f175d967b944c9cf3a7c62c70898cf69f73ededa53.jpg (4032x3024 38.52 KB, 818.86K)

Attached: b09f745f5441c58b71d3e468c07d507414ba6902d44a043f9c560c90be8040ea.png (501x799 85.51 KB, 325.48K)

Attached: f0549d2e1985ad36f5362f8be90b49c0475bf738a0adfdd26228d7cefb52a002.jpg (1080x1920 823.23 KB, 1.49M)

This. Abolish copyright and patents now. Foss only noaw. Under socialism we would pat people to maintain and build them instead of having 20 competing companies making the same inferior closed source bullshit.
-t programmer

FOSS style competing standards & implementations is how all competition should be carried out in communism.

it's so depressing to develop closed source shit for some rich asshole to make more money. I wish I could get paid well for working on FOSS…
A lot of my friends work for big companies (Fecalbook, et al.) and some of them work directly on creating new ways to show ads. Worst part is that they love their jobs and their company and would defend it to their deaths.

Attached: 893f95f6bef9a945791b3d60bdc3534d4ded319d7a4a70059910c41ddd791b9e.jpg (1250x700, 116.02K)

to be fair, Supreme doesn't sell it for $500, resellers do

Fossilized poop is very valuable archeological wise, as much as bones or even more tbh

Why did no-one else figure out this lad is the /polyp/?

Wehn a socialist government comes to power, we need to send all Yupies to reeducation camps.

wtf

youtube.com/watch?v=IKudILvqniU

LOL SUPREME is from the 90s, it's hardly new, and the OBEY thing being a 'fashion statement' was from the 2000s. Hilariously, however, OBEY is from the movie adaptation of 1984.

Attached: b7d9e9e0e27497abd91410b61209ded6348d46d685e22409940ad8ba6fa142ec.jpg (3264x1644 891.87 KB, 544.02K)

Attached: dogparker.jpg (960x720 299 KB, 83.52K)

Attached: 235f62346c77a15d9a0b28827d4854aa75165addd573285727a01312445b4dc3.png (2048x1536 82.75 KB, 377.7K)

doesn't matter when the brand was made, the same people who were wearing OBEY in the 2000s are wearing Supreme in the 2010s

That reminds me of a road-side billboard near a highway I often take, that advertises some sort of retirement plan company. The slogan is
in pic-related

Also: worldwideinterweb.com/the-20-dumbest-products-ever-made/

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (500x391, 178.64K)

Can't wait for smart water – a water dispenser that you can't drink from unless you have a Bluetooth connection to it. Introducing manly water: now with 60% less gay frog chemicals.

youtube.com/watch?v=dlaepaZ6-yo

That dog parker shit gave me cancer, so I had to make sure that it spreads all around my body.

Attached: 3.png (640x360 266.03 KB, 3.93M)

Why the fuck aren't dogs allowed in buildings in the first place? People can drag small children into those buildings and they're also likely to piss and shit on the floor. There's nothing "dog friendly" about having to put your dog in a containment cell.

Attached: 1422305589046.jpg (222x225, 6.45K)

Because they piss and shit everywhere you idiot.

dogs are for the most part consumerist nonsense that won’t exist under communism anyway, unless it’s an actually trained guard dog or blind person dog.

Attached: 0c368373d9c8c09a4778d50d482500da4adf49481033dd140dc4544ad3f62b52.jpg (552x528, 65.42K)

Most of the people wearing Supreme weren't even alive in the early 2000s

Only puppies do that you eejit.

Only on this board can I get this level of nuclear take, bravo

Attached: dog furry concern canine.jpg (1024x708, 129.22K)

nogs love air Jordans they will stand for them

make air Jordans illegal under communism

Fuck off Rafiq

Attached: dog with knife3423.jpg (500x373, 20.87K)

this

animals before capitalism: useful critters
animals after capitalism: pets
animals after communism: sausage

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1280x1024, 1.64M)

Chihuahuas, Shitzus, and Yorkies literally serve no purpose to the proletariat. If you need a dog to help with security or blind folk that’s fine, but other than that why the fuck would you have one? Most people only own dogs because they that it was a cool idea since they saw it on a TV commercial. The idea of pacifying animals so you can trap them in your home and watch them run and jump like a monkey is pure spectacle.

wow, such ancient wisdom, much truth, you impress

now go kill your self

Some people are allergic to them. Dogs are unhygienic, they smell, they piss and shit all over the place, and they can pose serious threat to kids.

Literally no arguments found. Why the fuck would we put economic resources (agriculture, meat, clothing, accessories) into your fucking capitalist hobby under communism?

Let them fucking die off peacefully, after they serve no more purpose (herding, blind escort, etc.). Porky's idiotic breeding hobby already made a lot of them suffer their existence, not being able to rear pups without medical help, their limbs going useless after a few years, TONS of medical defects.

Grow the fuck up and stop living in your boomer movies about Lassie.

Your use of "capitalist" indicates you don't know what that word means. Fuck off back to reddit/twitter/tumblr/wherever isn't here.

okay, what exactly isn’t capitalist about having a genetically engineered plushy you can take home and watch like a freak show without tickets you mlquetoast pinko?

t. never owned or ever seen a well trained dog

There is nothing wrong with having pets.

Attached: a0fda978a3caba958e50067ab65a0996.jpg (290x512, 31.96K)

good. god knows what perverted travisties we should witness at the end of the production line.

I don't care if you're some Zig Forums dipshit or if you're serious. Retards like you are not welcome here.

Your right, true comrades have domesticated foxes.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesticated_red_fox

It’s the same type of people. Rich, unintelligent, shallow, teens.

Isn’t communism post-scarciy

Really? I always felt like the Supreme and Obey hats were more of a lumpen trend

...

I wonder if we could to the same thing done to these foxes to humans. Selectively breed reactionary behaviour away. How many centuries would it take? fufufu

it is obvious you are just a redlib idealist who wants to be able to have your cake and eat it too. I’m sorry, owning a Chihuahua you can dress up and play fetch up with all day is NOT a communist, just like how owning a fidget spinner to show your friends isn’t. I’m sorry your brain has been so emotionally altered by porky’s agitprop, but I’m afraid like all of us you’re not going to be able to have your cake and eat it too.

They're not supposed to be work dogs (despite this Yorkies have served in the military) and a dogs purpose is not to be some arbitrary animal slave. It is your companion, a 4 legged comrade who gives you comfort, protects you, plays with you, and helps you
Citation needed
Literally not what having a pet is at all. Just saying "It's spectacle" does not make it spectacle. The fact that all of you people say this shows how completely ignorant you are about dogs. Just like most Burgers.

Wow, such bad grammar.

No-one is talking about encouraging that you dipshit. This is like saying "lets reject ALL GPS systems because it was made by capitalism" except in a sociopathic sense that "everything not immediately useful is to be discarded". Sorry we don't want to be robots, but how about you just do the cybernetic brain implants to yourself and leave us 'fools' alone, eh?
Some people are allergic to all kinds of food, so lets ban food right?
You have never seen a dog up-close have you?
1) Unhygeinic? They clean themselves and only dislike baths if you train them badly.
2) Smell? We also smell, but our nose does not register that. No dog will smell from a distance unless it is poorly taken care of or a starving street dog.
3) piss and shit all over the place? Literally untrue. A well trained dog will do its business in the appropriate place.
4) Threat to kids? So are humans, in fact HUMANS are far bigger a threat to kids than any other animal. Again well-trained dogs do not attack kids, not to mention that dogs rarely attack children or people in the first place unless they are guard dogs or feeling threatened.

Strawman argument.

Attached: warrior and dog dancing.gif (720x404, 4.16M)

Epic straw man you emotionally stunted child. Nobody is saying to abolish dogs, just that they serve no purpose outside of practical workplace or civilizational applications. Of course you just ignored that because you waltzed into this thread looking for a boogieman to get angry at.

So what?
Poor people aspire to own sneakers and flashy things. Who the fuck are you to tell them they aren't entitled? Please don't repeat republican talking points about muh rims, muh sneakers, muh watches, muh cars with "left" rhetoric.
When communism is achieved, people can have all the fucking sneakers they want

brand loyalty and other such consumerist garbage is a late capitalist invention. believe it or not.
wants marketing and advertising are killed as industry people are not going to fundamentally want the garbage shit they're raised from birth to be obsessed with and ripped off for.

Lol that second pic makes me laugh uncontrollably, like it's so cliched but kek.

of course it is, but right now are you going to call poor young people traitors for wanting a pair of sneakers?

Trying to squeeze every little shit-take and non-issue as relevant to anti-capitalism or communism is practically sabotage on par with liberal idpol. You're either trying to make the left look bad on purpose, or you're too much of a brainlet to be of much use to anyone except the reaction. The result is the same.

P-scar is won by rationalizing production, not prodigality on a finite planet.

Your attempt at a parallelism was noted, but rejected. While GPS serves an economic purpose, pet-faggotry is exactly the admission of purposelessness: critters that were once useful now became pure spectacular "companions" – replacement elements, an ersatz for our capitalist estrangement. Please ideology-crit yourself.

Again, bad parallelism. Nobody is rubbing into the faces of others allergenic food, yet somehow you think that allowing allergenic pets into human spaces is comparable. Pure, uncut ideology.

Unhygienic by human biological standards.
Stank by human standards.
ELL OOH ELL
Humans don't pose a threat of inexplicably biting another's arteries multiple times with their nonexistent predator teeth.

Let's put collars on humans, you non-sequituring idiot.

Daily reminder that dog breeds are brands.

Brands are by definition controlled and owned by a single source (even if they are sometimes licensed), anyone can breed a Siberian Husky so no, you are wrong and also a faggot.

Attached: RP5vOUH.png (500x491, 160.76K)

Except pitbulls, they should all be killed immediately.

ok, thanks for the contribution soccer mom

there are bad dog owners not bad breeds

Attached: smug pets.jpg (500x494, 78.66K)

I have been thinking about this a lot, I have 4 cats and 2 dogs, all my cats were rescued and one of my dogs is rescued too, yeah you are right a lot of resources are wasted on pets, there is no doubt about it.
but having a companion is highly therapeutic, for people of all ages, but specially for the mentally ill, they also help develop the personality of a person.
Don't be such a killjoy, I'm sure that in communism people will have fun too.

Pitbulls are breed to fight, they are very dangerous, I fear pitbulls and have been interacting with dogs all of my life.
Shepherd and Guard dogs are the best there is the other breeds are a waste of time.

Attached: 4dc9d4bda374fbd9ecdedf6396b3583444ecb051f1f2062287f5d4d2fd34dcf8.jpeg (536x606, 73.04K)

having a pet helps ignore the alienation that we suffer under capitalist society, in socialism there'll be much less reason for people to desire animal companions. that's not to say that dogs will immediately get the gulag after the revolution but 100-200 years down the line people will be looking back at "pets" as a weird and unsettling archaic trend

false dichotomy. if you get a dog that's been literally bred to kill, like pitbulls, it's your fault for putting others at risk. most hunting dogs should not be allowed near people.

So what do we do with them?, they were pretty much the first tamed animal, they can't survive on their own.

one of the most surreal Zig Forums brigadings for sure

That's literally one of the biggest types of thread in /an/, it only takes 10 posts for not only black people comparisons but also "breed of peace"(that one is pretty funny tbh)

nah, pitbulls are aggressive pieces of shit
even the "well trained" ones will tear strange dogs apart at the drop of a hat

You almost made me roll some tears with this, I almost have no friends, my pets bring me so much joy.
lol.

I grabbed that image while lurking at Zig Forums and I felt bad posting it in here, it was a mistake.
but you got to admit that pitbulls are scary, Dobermans and Rottweilers weren't as much of a menace as pitbulls are today.

i never stated the opposite, but people on the internet didn't talk about pitbulls nearly as much before the Zig Forums campaign. i just find it funny how they fell for their own falseflag

I still don't get why we need to do anything about them. This must be one of the most retarded non-issues discussed on Zig Forums

That's what i'm saying, there's no solution that doesn't include "restoring" them to the wilderness or massive euthanasia.

Don't breed new ones. There, I fixed it.

Oh well, that makes sense. good luck regulating that.

City of Centennial Animal-to-Human Dog Bites 2010-2017 by Breed and Severity

Number 1: Labrador retriever

Minor: 58
Moderate: 25
Severe: 1
Unknown: 3

Number 2: German shepherd

Minor: 27
Moderate: 15
Severe: 2
Unknown: 3

Number 3. Chihuahua (short hair)

Minor: 26
Moderate: 0
Severe: 0
Unknown: 1

Number 4: Australian cattle dog

Minor: 19
Moderate: 6
Severe: 1
Unknown: 0

Number 5: Pit bull

Minor: 17
Moderate: 4
Severe: 1
Unknown: 2

Unincorporated Douglas County Animal-to-Human Dog Bites 2010-2017 by Breed and Severity

Number 1: Labrador retriever

Minor: 69
Moderate: 20
Severe: 1
Unknown: 9

Number 2: German shepherd

Minor: 44
Moderate: 24
Severe: 2
Unknown: 5

Number 3: Australian shepherd

Minor: 35
Moderate: 6
Severe: 1
Unknown: 5

Number 4: Pit bull

Minor: 28
Moderate: 10
Severe: 1
Unknown: 0

Number 5: Australian cattle dog

Minor: 22
Moderate: 9
Severe: 0
Unknown: 6

The important point for me is not to alienate 99% of potential sympathizers who visit this board because a couple of complete fucking autists/pol false-flaggers keep yelling about how we need to end dogs because "they're bourgie or something lmao".
Because that's even more retarded than the vast majority of the worst liberal idpol cancer.

"Welcome to the left. Your pet must die."

Literal rubbish.
Allergenic food is everywhere, and unlike a dog, food is far harder to avoid if you are not aware. With a dog, allergies are almost always sneezing and itchiness, with food you usually get near-fatal results
Not everyone is a fucking anemic fuck like you, you fucking moralist.
This is like the fucking human nature argument. At one point in time humans did not wash themselves at all because bathing was considered a bad thing, and this persisted for centuries in places like medieval Europe. Dogs aren't any dirtier than most humans. They don't sweat, and clean themselves.
Nope
No argument
Nice strawman. Sorry but that isn't a common occurrance. Paedophilia on the other hand…
A human being's bit is comparable to a dog's. A normal human adult can bite through the hand of another human, bones and all.
No, you shill.

Which statement are you calling a strawman? There are multiple arguments.
Ad hominum, dismissed.
See and all the other posts about how "if they aren't directly physically useful they shouldn't be owned"
Again this logic follows the same train of thought as getting rid of fiction books. King Arthur and the Knights of the ROund table? It doesn't directly benefit the proletariat in their work, BURN IT. Sinbad? We all know Rocs don't exist, it serves no purpose for people, BURN IT. There are things outside of fucking direct material consumerism you sociopathic twats.
They do serve a purpose. A dog is a living being that acts as one's companion, they protect you just as you would protect them, they help out, they play and spend time with you, as a friend would. So what they're not humans. Sorry that animals aren't machines.
Uhh no, I was the one of the first people to post in this thread after OP made it. I wasn't looking for a boogieman, and I didn't find one. What I found was a bunch of apathetic pseudo-pragmatists who think that everything must serve a direct exact purpose or shouldn't exist. Fuck off.

Then you're an idiot. No animal attacks without a reason and no dog is specifically more aggressive than another. Raise a pitbull as you would a labrador, they'll be the same, just as a labrador would be aggressive if you raised it wrong.

Why?
Pets and domestication have been a part of human culture since Homo Sapiens became Hunter-gatherers. Thousands of years.
Moreover, there is nothing wrong with pets, properly taken care of. They establish relationships with us, similar to one another or humans with one another. We may not speak the same language, but we communicate and enjoy one another's company.

Pit bulls aren't bred to be aggressive, they're trained to be that way. They are bred to be powerful. With your logic, a genetically engineered human, designed to be physically stronger and faster than normal humans is immediately a threat and should be considered dangerous.
bullshit. I had 2 pitbulls in my neighborhood, their owners were a rowdy bunch, those dogs never gave enough of a damn to even lunge at passing people, despite being unleashed often.
They can be sure, but don't judge a book by its cover.
Pitbulls were bred for dog fighting, Dobermans and Rottweilers were bred to fight people. I've had a playful romp with a large Doberman, they're incredibly strong and their teeth are like daggers.

you could've said "and they often attack people" but no you had to go down the insufferable route.
critically support dogs against youth imperialism.

sciencemag.org/news/2016/12/six-cloned-horses-help-rider-win-prestigious-polo-match
Biggest waste I’ve ever seen.

DOG PARKING IS BOURGEOIS
DOG COFFINS ARE COMMUNIST
ANTI PITBULL GANG; THEM KIDS DINDU NUFFIN

The fact that western people are today in need of non-human "companions" to help them in a "therapeutic" way tells a lot about their conditions. Communists should clearly see through what is and see what could be. Just because today something seems necessary, doesn't mean that the same conditions will arise tomorrow.