Whats the difference between the other leftist boards?

Attached: 1456868689483.png (225x250, 51.28K)

It 100% is, think of all the absolute shitty people who get banned from here, sure there's the R*java imperialism supporters and people who call Stalin a r ed fascist but their not absolutely bottom of the barrel people and can make some "arguments" and are at-least Socialist. But all the absolute shitters the radlibs,nazbols,strassers.,fascists,liberals all seem to of found their way to Zig Forums.

The link to other leftist Zig Forums boards is broken and has a 403 forbidden error

It’s been colonized by them and is home to at least two or three unironic Pol Pot-ists, pic related. There’s barely any moderation

Attached: C0DBD428-7391-48F9-B3DD-2B3BDB21EA88.jpeg (679x2047 473.31 KB, 583.9K)

Attached: dustforce player enters his first golden key door.gif (200x198, 426.7K)

Then why would you leave up 15 literal MRA threads on the front page despite multiple reports, while deleting any single thread about feminism, along with a ban?
That's not even mentioning the general obvious Zig Forums spam that you just leave there, because I guess offtopic bad faith shitposts really contribute to the ambience and match the board topic?
Have you looked at the catalog?
If you compared Zig Forums and Zig Forums side by side, are you confident you could tell them apart without checking?

Ive seen litterally just 2 reports in the past week which i promptly locked.
Also
also

I can ban anything you think is problematic but then the board would be dead as rocks. Report more, faggot. I am not going to dig through all the threads and read every post to see if its kosher.
Eh, yes?

Go whine in the FAQ instead of being salty and making false accusations.

Of course there is. Is this Zig Forums BO or a mod posting? Because that stance is worrying. It's literally "antifa are fascists" tier.

So to you human rights are a zero sum game?

lol wut. I never said MRAs and feminists are "opposite". The poster above me claimed they are the same, I said of course they aren't the same.
Not to me, but maybe to you. Because it seems that to you if things aren't the same, they are the opposite. Which obviously isn't true.

There are many differences between feminists and MRAs, like their history or their current "alignment". All socialists are feminists because feminism is about equal rights for men and women. MRAs are aligned with the "right-wing". MRA is an offshoot of the whole redpill/MWGTOW movements which are misogynist and sexist. And it was all because some men blamed women for the systemic issues they were experiencing, like not being able to find a partner or perhaps not moving up quickly in their career. These "problems" are due to the expectations people have about the world, many of them have been raised on movies where the protagonist always gets the girl, where hard work is always rewarded by promotion, where one just has to put in the time, and advancement/money will come. The world isn't a movie and not everyone lives a fairytale existence, so naturally they looked for someone to blame. Then they see ads about pushing women into certain jobs, or see statistics about women receiving more bachelor degrees, and they think "oh! my problems must be because of women!" What they don't see is that capital doesn't care *who* owns it, who moves it, who makes it grow, it can be a woman, a man, a transwoman, an otherkin, doesn't matter, as long as they are a Human with the power within the State legal framework to *own* capital. The reality is their situation, because of their material conditions and class, was the same as before, when "men ruled". The working class has always had a shit existence, sometimes they blame it on immigrants, sometimes on Jews, and now on women; conveniently not being against the actual culprit – capitalism.

Feminists (leftists, not liberals) want to achieve gender equality through dismantling of capitalism and giving ownership/control of the means of production to the workers. MRAs want to achieve "gender equality" by regressing to traditional gender roles and conservatism in general, because "women were happier when all they had to do was work in the kitchen".

Attached: tfwnoancomgf.jpg (1600x1066, 355.89K)

sure lad

Now this is a level of dishonesty and projection ive not seen in a while. You litterally likened saying mras are the same as feminists, to saying fascists are the same as anti-fascists. You said they are completely opposite, that one is entirely opposed to the goals and existance of the other.

Feminism is a movement for womens rights, so that is demonstrebly false. But keep shouting this, while the people that shout this also dismiss male issues. Its an empty statement shouted to shut down anyone who doesnt align with mainstream feminist agenda.

I dont give a shit about either mras or feminists and if you want me to ban mras I will happily oblige and ban both explicit feminists and explicit mras. Its identity politics and fucking retarded.

Now if you have any more things to be a whiny little reddit sounding shit over, do it in the FAQ.

Terrible reading comprehension. If something is in the same "tier" it means they are similar, but NOT the same. You making the argument "there is no difference between feminists and MRAs" is in the same tier as a radical centrist making the argument that "there is no difference between antifa and fascists". The point I was trying to make is that your claim is untrue and ridiculous.

Exactly, I "likened" them. You understood what I was trying to do. pic related
I did not say this.

That started back when women had very little rights. Are you going to ignore history?
No one is shouting.
And what is (or what do you think is) the "mainstream feminist agenda"?

Then you shouldn't be getting so defensive. You care enough to have an opinion on it, and you've expressed that opinion publicly. Don't back away in anger when that opinion is challenged.
When did I say I want you to ban anyone? This exchange started when you wrote that there is no difference between feminists and MRAs, which I have proven to be false by mentioning that their history/development is different, as well as their political alignment. So there definitely *are* differences, it just suits you to dismiss them and lump the two into the same category. Because that is EASY.
Nice analysis. This is not the kind of discourse that heals divides and pushes the leftist movement forward. It probably achieves the opposite.

Why do you take a difference in opinion personally? You're getting angry for no reason. I'm not the source of your troubles. Insulting me won't help you, and it certainly won't help me. Why do it?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-01-06 the definition of likened.png (486x311, 16.13K)

based

That's the dumbed shit I read today, congratulations!

you should question why he's talking about the "mainstream feminist agenda"

All socialists are only "feminists" in a particular way, not in the sense of liberal or rad-liberal feminism, and this idea of equality is not the same as what either of those groups would believe, to the point that many wouldn't recognize our "feminism" as feminism.

This is just liberal idealism, yet one sees such idealist explanations constantly from self-declared socialists. These explanations are structured to imply "women's problems must be understood in terms of capitalism; men's problems are purely psychological," reflective also of the dynamic on the Anglophone left where women are identified as the innocent (or victims), men the guilty (or victimizers).

Zig Forums is the only active communist board on the English-speaking internet really.

Zig Forums was a split from Zig Forums due to the question of one big US military base in Syria, and is now mostly overrun by NazBols, incels and fascists.

/marx/ is pretty much Ismail's Facebook page, a guy who has read a lot of history of socialist states in the 20th century.

The other boards are dead.

Also, the men's rights movement preceded "red pill" ideology. It was formed mainly due to child custody laws in the US and other inequalities in the legal system (e.g. sentencing), originally. But this is more a criticism of the potted history rather than the point that it's largely right-wing at the moment, which is at least true.

Your moderation is absolute shit, or non-existent. I actually did like Zig Forums in the beginning, due to the cooler flags and lack of sectarian moderation (and I say that as a ML). But you guys pandered to Zig Forums and now you got the result.

There are dozens of MRA threads on the frontpage, the consensus is literal right-wing IdPol, if you post anything that even slightly implies "I don't think women should be sex slaves bound to the kitchen'' you are being bombarded by thread-derailing """anti-IdPol leftists""" with an actual right-wing/incel IdPol, the entire board is basically left-wing incel posting. Zig Forums, due to this quality or lack thereof became just another version of /leftyb/, with unironic Pol Pot threads, MRA talking points, pro-fascist circlejerks masquarading as "anti-IdPol" that only differeniate from Zig Forums in the sense that they want universal healthcare and some more co-ops or simply shitposting topics. If I want to bring up a topic sincerely or would make a sincere effortpost, I'd go to Zig Forums. Genuine advise: Clean up your fucking board or remain another /b/ with economically progressive characteristics.

You didn't comprehend what I was trying to say. Maybe the fault lies with me, I'm just not writing clear enough.

I said the "problems" (i.e. problems in society, pertaining to themselves, perceived by working class MRAs) are due to their expectations from life. But then I go onto say:
Which is most decidedly a socialist analysis of the issue. I approach the MRA issue two ways: the first way, the one you responded to, was an attempt to figure out why a man might agree with or join an MRA movement; the second was the socialist analysis of why those men experience the problems they do.

I haven't actually looked at the history of it. I was speaking from my experience. It seemed to me MRA blew up after I saw the redpill/MWGTOW stuff blow up, or at least those people made the movement larger and more vocal. I haven't really heard of 'MRA' until recently (couple of years ago).

According to wikipedia it started off as a response to feminism:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men's_rights_movement

So maybe liking the "antifa are the same as fascists" argument to "feminists are the same as MRAs" is truer than I thought!

You are a fucking retard. Glad the moderation of Zig Forums pretty much exposed itself as right-wing IdPol. What do you think would your precious Öcalan followers say if they heard you say that?

I found more results for "Nazi" on Zig Forums than on Zig Forums, therefore, Zig Forums is anti-fascist and Zig Forums is fascist.

Are you really a mod on Zig Forums? If yes, are you drunk or something? You have the brain of a dog.

Materialist feminists - again, not liberal feminists - have always cared about the superstructural effects of productive relations on men as well, the fact that they need to "suck up" when they are sad (the OG toxic masculinity), the fact that they need to pay for dinner even if they earn less than their partner, etc.

That's the board owner, space_.

All problems can be said to arise from expectations, as expectations are always connected to desires. One might reach Buddhism by realizing this, but not Marxism.

It's structured to seem that way, yet it isn't.

Declaring that someone isn't analyzing capitalism through Marxism is not itself a material explanation

"Because of their material conditions and class" (are these separate now?) would be true for any Marxist; that is to say, it's an explanation reiterating what materialism means while explaining nothing at all about the specific conditions in the first half. It has something of the effect of incantation here, "material conditions," and the impression remains that the expectations are illogical, due to some problem in men rather than the beliefs forming as a response to anything specific within those conditions.

Hortative isn't explanation either.

You want me to ban people because their retard ideology doesnt align with your retard ideology. I replied because you called me a nazi and complained about the moderation me and the other mods provided.
Maybe instead of whining in yourself and here, you could actually post it on leftpol we can see it, rather than complain nothing is being done while not even reporting things yourself using the report feature.

Oh im sorry when did fucking leftypol become a safe haven for tumblr tier idpolled cunts like you? Leftypol and leftpol too has since the starts only had anti identity politics as its main unifier. If you want to whine about da wymynz or how evil some american neckbeards on leftpol are that you still havent reported so I am not going to find them, then fuck off tbh.

1. You call people nazis because they dont explicitly ban everything you disagree with
2. You are a whiny cunt
3. If you want to improve the moderation, complain in the place your complaints are heard, instead of just being salty in obscure threads on other boards that I just happen to find this time.

The 10 people that post once in a while get mad if you overmoderate, thats why they moved to leftpol.

report them fucking hell, I cant find em and im not going to spend my limited time looking through all the threads to find one that fits your interpretation of what is and is not mra.

big thonk

Hm yes wanting people to stop circumsizing male babies or wanting better child custody laws is definitely the same as the dichotomy of wanting to genocide people vs wanting to stop the other group from achieving their goals

Salt salt all this salt. I dont give a shit about the kurds btw im not an anarchist, I just delete spam.
i thought mras were right wing according to you? And the right wing hates feminists? how does that work out

nope

Again:
REPORT SPAM INSTEAD OF WHINING ON A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BOARD THAT THERE IS SPAM, I HAVE TO GO TO WORK, DO SHIT, HANG OUT WITH FRIENDS, I AM NOT YOUR PERSONAL SLAVE WHO READS EVERY POST MADE, that shit is terrible for your mental health, i suggest taking a break from 8ch for a bit, its fucking great
Otherwise, if you have grievances, post them in the faq where the mods will all see and read them, thank you.

Fuck mra's and fuck anyone who feels the need to repeat "all socialists are feminists btw (except you because you arent feminist enough)". We are socialists, not feminists. There is overlap, but they are not the same, and no-true scotsmanning feminists every time by saying "oh not liberal/bourgie/first world/campus/procapitalist feminists, only true feminists
does nothing to convince me, it does the opposite.

Attached: shrug yui.jpg (810x780, 74.34K)

...

Attached: 6FE00136-23C6-46D8-97C3-7697D0D04018.jpeg (652x1852, 347.84K)

>

...

You accuse some yet to be proven "mra presence" on leftpol of advocating that women should be in the kitchen with no rights. I have not seen it, as far as I know youre just talking out of your ass.
Then you claim that me saying that identity politics is shit is an admission of agreeing with said imaginary foe, even though that is also idpol, and use this to accuse me of being a reactionary.
I know you know you are being completely dishonest. Be better than Zig Forums and stop doing these retarded baseless accusation tactics the right always does.

"not wanting women chained to the kitchen stove with no rights" is normal, its not some grand revelation that only the enlightened idpol feminists have. Fucking hell mate.
Being anti-idpol doesnt mean you want women to be litteral slaves or even have any less rights than any other person, because wanting such things in itself is identity politics.

Its not my board lad.

See above + it was there already

Example?

Not an argument

You can’t even mention women with out two or three retards (I know its the same posters) derailing the entire thread screeching about “roasties”, “idpol” or “tumblr”. It’s ridiculous, even socialist feminism is attacked

Attached: eaff8171edfd4ef701b008a12ed51da8854b0338e3ed488eba021d8d8fa81553.jpg (907x718, 46.67K)

Oh whats this? Still no reports for anything of the "many mra threads and openly fascist shitposters?" Gosh.

Attached: WbM7Xo9[1].png (321x225, 6.6K)

Oh gee look at this, why would this board run by literal nazis and mras ban incel spam?

Attached: UdYjTqk[1].png (1898x232, 54.23K)

I just checked out the feminism thread, where one would expect the "roastie" shit to be everywhere, but it's one guy and people quoting him to criticize him. "Idpol" is everywhere, for obvious reasons, but doesn't in itself mean anything in relation to what the poster believes. "Tumblr" isn't anywhere.

>>>Zig Forums

I never go to Zig Forums normally. I was wanting to see if the accusations were true, though, rather than condemn a board I don't even look at.

>>>Zig Forums

No. I'm quite happy talking to people who disagree with me. We are talking, aren't we?
You have me mistaken with somebody.
This is my first post in the thread. Followed by , , .

I actually post more on Zig Forums and just lurk Zig Forums. I replied to this post because I couldn't let a stupid claim like that go unchallenged.

I am against identity politics myself.

That is a lot of anger. Your inability to have a 2-3 post long discussion without raging and throwing fits should preclude you from any kind of moderation position. You obviously aren't able to make impartial decisions and are guided by your emotions.

Not me.
Uncalled for. Those kinds of things don't make you look strong, they make you look week. You're just lashing out because you feel like you're backed into a corner. No one is attacking you. We're just a couple of leftists, talking on an internet image board. Keep that in mind.
A lot of people were unhappy with how the BO change was handled and the way the board is run. Here's a thread I made about getting rid of "NazBol" from the board (/res/112475.html) and threads like this (/res/112272.html) are still allowed to stay up, despite the OP pic being a swastika and a Nazi salute. Do I need to make a special request to the commissar in the moderation thread?

OP I know youre desperate to get proof but you dont need to fabricate your own fake news.
This was just posted on leftpol, big coincidence. Enjoy ur 1 day ban, because im feeling nice today and I know its not serious.

Attached: iuSt0Hu[1].png (867x253, 127.81K)

Big thonk

Attached: firefox_2019-01-06_16-52-35.png (632x315, 115.99K)

(same ip)

Correction: is my post, in reply to:

Which is the stupid claim.

I don't care what you say. It's impossible these days to normally discuss the most superficial topics on Zig Forums without the thread being derailed about women's dating preferences. Whether or not it's just one guy that keeps getting banned doesn't matter, because this shit sure as hell doesn't happen on Zig Forums, and you can't really claim Zig Forums is IdPol.

Here's some evidence, lads

anti-feminism:
8ch.net/leftpol/res/113382.html
"The woman problem"
"There is a serious problem with the left as the she-woman man hater's club. The Democratic Party, the Labour Party, and many other institutional parties have succumbed to the man hating menace. How do we rise above feminism? How do we cultivate the incel vein of wrath towards women and use it against the powers that be?"
147 replies

nazis/racists/whatever baiting:
8ch.net/leftpol/res/117677.html
"What characteristics of Zac Efron makes him adept at national-socialism?"

8ch.net/leftpol/res/117174.html
"What does Zig Forums think of Asian Americans or other Asian people living in western countries?"

8ch.net/leftpol/res/117174.html
"This dumb nigger thought he could fight imperialism and the white man. Look what happened, BTFO"

8ch.net/leftpol/res/118163.html
"Is Being Asian Good? i wanna know cause i wanna know what marx thought of asians"

8ch.net/leftpol/res/116744.html
"Recently I discovered a very interesting fact – one which helps explain the dominance of the Jewish people in our economy and the West at large."

8ch.net/leftpol/res/111421.html
"Was he actually Jewish?"

etc. etc.

These people are no different from Zig Forums or NRx types liking the Spanish Inquisition or whatever. I don't want these people in my movement.

Then why complain about supposed mras disagreeing with you on leftpol so much that you say "Why dont you ban them weeee"?

I disregard anyones opion who tries to use pshychoanalisis to attack and discredit people in order to win an internetdebate, sorry. Its a form of ad hominem.

I cannot tell you apart from that other person so I logically assumed you to be the same person. This does not invalidate anything I said.

Back at it again with the pseudo-science psychology.

On the contrary, i got called a nazi, a reactionary, etc, and so did space, a good friend of mine. I will not let people make retarded accusations, especially if they act like you act.

It also has a hammer&sickle and a commie salute, its a nazbol meme thread.

If you reported it and it was dismissed, but you feel this is unfair, then yes, posting about it in the moderation thread is a very galaxy brain option you might want to explore.

Good job, but that's not even scratching the surface of the swamp that is Zig Forums. Also check out the +50 replies (big for Zig Forums) thread about sex work being praised which has some pornstars in g-strings as a picture.

It's the lived experience of many who wanted to post on Zig Forums in good faith. I just checked my screencap folder with effortposts, every single one of them is from Zig Forums, and Zig Forums is far from perfect either. It's not my fault that you don't care about what's going on on a board of which you are moderator.

Has some decent discussion and ive personally not seen it reported.
meme/shitpost thread
Doesnt contain a lot of shit
Oh gosh look at that, it is also been locked for a week
Locked as soon as it was posted
Anchored for a long time
Gee its anchored

Sex workers are not in any way a concensus even within the left. Even within feminist groups you have vividly anti and pro sex worker people.

Other than the first thread, I don't really see anything beyond random Zig Forums posters, baiting and joke threads. All of the threads cited except for the first, one of the Asian threads, and the Efron thread are anchored.

The first thread led to productive discussion anyway, so I wouldn't have seen any reason to anchor it either.

Are you new to imageboards?

You are correct, which is also funny because the BO or ex-BO (didn't keep up with that) claimed that Zig Forums would have some sort of democratic feedback system from its userbase. Literally none of that happened. In fact, Zig Forums is run more neglectful in regards to the desires of its userbase than fucking Zig Forums with a BO that has shown to be very authoritarian.

Are you new to imageboards?
Most imageboards, I'd say 90%, is nowadays dominated by Zig Forums or some form of NutSac posting and incel stuff. I don't mind people posting porn, anime or calling each other faggots, the problem is, that on Zig Forums, this shit seems to be posted unironically on a board that is supposedly communistic.

Attached: confused.png (300x256, 101.83K)

This wasn't reflected properly in this thread. In fact, most of the posts there were MRA/incel posting. If you see a thread derailing like this, you need to anchor it. You definition of "good discussion" seem to be summed up by "shitting on women as much as possible". Totally healthy discussion.
"Jews control the world, debunk it!"

Zig Forums started out like this but BO has been inactive for a while on Zig Forums, the one big US military base in Syria issue isn't even that enforced anymore, and today Zig Forums is dominated by scum that got banned from here. You are saying that criminals in Stalin's gulags weren't criminals just because a certain perecentage in there was innocent.

I have not said I want you to ban them. Yet you keep insisting I did. I didn't comment on the moderation until you said I should complain on Zig Forums. I never complained about the anti-feminism stuff because thankfully there are a few leftists who haven't swallowed any kind of pill yet and the anti-feminists get shut down quickly. I did complain about "NazBol" and I think "NazBol" should be treated like nazism, fascism, etc. meaning just delete it on sight. There's nothing wrong with deleting nazi posts.

You went on a long rant about something or other and called me a whiny cunt for no reason, based on 1-2 posts I've written. You lose your cool way too fast. It's not psychoanalysis, it's just observation.

That's not logic.

Then why would you write "2. You are a whiny cunt" then? To hurt me? People who threaten or try to offend people on the internet are the same kind of people that don't stand up to others in public. Again, not psychoanalysis, just observation. It sucks that you have to work under someone, or gf troubles, or be bullied, I don't know your fucking life, but something is chipping away at you that makes you have a short fuse. You lash out in anger at strangers on the internet.

Again, I never called you those things.

That's a problem. "NazBol" has no place on a leftist board.

No, I didn't report it. If you don't have time to moderate, why are you a moderator?

I have no problem with someone putting a sexy picture above his post. "No problem" as in "not ban worthy". But even someone like you should be able to tell the difference between imageboard culture and unironic incel politics.

Also, never forget about that Jim Profit guy posting under the Bizarro-NazBol flag (why do we need a flag like that???!) that does nothing but posting anime, talking about Jason Unruhe and Jim Profit and complains about "moderators". This guy might as well be the most active user on Zig Forums.

Why would I dig through a thread about sex workers?

Yet many of the bans were permanent

talk about logic

Calling you a whiny cunt isnt the same as acting like a freshman psych student, its normal behaviour even in real life where I live. I am not angry in the slightest, but the tactic of "oh you are mad this means you are mentally unstable ergo I am right because I am the reasonable cool headed person" is old as balls and I do not appreciate it.

Says you, its a meme you dip.

A moderator reviews reported things. The firewatch doesnt patrol streets looking for fires, they go to reported fires.

A picture of some slightly overdone bimbos in swimsuits isnt exactly "unironic incell politics".

This is crazy when you think about it. The reddit boards used to be way bigger, but if you look at actual active numbers, Zig Forums is ahead of them even with the split. Even funnier is that /r/soc or /r/anarchism posters would probably get banned here for their SJW shit and for eating up imperialist propaganda, likewise posters here would get banned there for not being retarded.

permabans are 3 months

What is this site, western europe? "lifelong" sentences of 25 years.

it's a hotwheels era policy because he realized IP bans weren't very effective anyway and that with phones and vpns, many people are on one IP

I just checked, and the post is actually different. My post has proper capitalisation and punctuation, posts before it don't. The poster calling Zig Forums moderators nazis saged every time they posted, I didn't sage.

I'm sorry you have to live like that. Again, that is not my fault.

I never used your anger as something with which to prop up my argument. Also, what is this about "winning the argument"? What's the prize? Who decides the winner? It's almost as if there is nothing to win. I don't discuss things with people in hopes to "win an argument". As I said before, we are all leftists just talking, we should be 1) nicer to one another, 2) be willing to give one another the benefit of a doubt. I mentioned the anger in relation to your capacity of being a moderator, and I made the claim that you'd make decisions based on emotions.

Im sorry english doesnt have a good word. In my language they are called "fire repellers"

Oh and point me to a modern firefighting station that has camera looking for fire in towns.

Well, I'd assume that a moderator of a board would at least check it twice a week, maybe post a few times (not as a mod) and participate in the community. This "I'm busy. Report it, I will delete it when called" shit is annoying.

Then when actual regular users/posters on the board tell you what they see as problems on the board you dismiss them. Why should you get to decide what content is on the board when you yourself admitted you're too busy to regularly frequent the board?

Is it the power? It's the power, isn't it?

I think most genuine socialists got banned from these subreddits as you get banned from them for an eyeblink. I got banned one week after using these boards when I called Trump "stupid". Most people won't cancel subscription to these boards after being banned, so you can assume many subs who never post on there are probably just banned.

r/latestagecapitalism is making the rounds recently, even makes to the frontpage sometimes, but it's not a sub for socialist discussion. I literally think, and this is crazy, that Zig Forums is the only place on the Internet is where you genuinely discuss and debate communist ideas. It speaks more about the absolute state of the communist discourse in the world than for Zig Forums.

Did they tell you why? 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧Ableism🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 or something?

I asked the mods due to replying to the ban message, and the answer I got was: "Read the rules".

Weird. I swear the only purpose of those retarded subreddits is to make leftists look bad

I think r/CapitalismVSocialism, despite being a debate sub for opposing ideologies, or r/Collapse are more authentically leftist than these subs. I mean, for a subreddit with such a huge amount of subs, they are close to be dead. All people do on r/socialism these days is posting progressive news articles. All the action happens elsewhere.

This is also dogshit, it's basically another chapo board.

I imagine there must be some good forums in non-English languages. However, maybe it's for the best. Smart commies in countries where communism has a chance shouldn't waste their time online, they should be debating and working inside their party.
Also, Marxist twitter is good if you can figure out who to follow. There's about 500 to 1000 Marxist accounts on there that are hardcore anti-idpol, anti-liberalism, anti-opportunism, etc. There's a bunch of other accounts that seem good on the surface but turn out to have some kind of shitty secret agenda. Lots of feuds and splits cuz it's twitter, but it means you get to see all sides of a debate.

opposite of what happened, Zig Forums is infested with redditankies
slow and most posts are shitposts, but posters aren't required to suck Eurasia's and Eastasia's dicks
another source of infestation on Zig Forums
slow, go away NSA
cuckcha-infested, shitty design, slow

Are you claiming that /marx/, a board with three posts per day where users mostly share scanned literature, "infested" Zig Forums?! Holy crap, this meme about anarkiddies having a persecution complex since Kronstadt is actually real

lmao Orwell has really rotted your brain

/marx/ is apparently less banhappy than both Zig Forums and Zig Forums, which may show that really the issue isn't really with tendency but moderators themselves. I wont deny that a lot of tanks are moderator sycophants but subreddits like /r/anarchism are just as bad with that sort of bullshit, left communist may be least bad on the issue but that just may be due they sort of traffic their specific boards attract since most of them still aren't Jim Profit pilled. Really this is more of an issue with the left in general as opposed to any specific tendency, possibly since leftists tend to be very oversocialized as old Ted K used to say.

Nah, they actually banned me for 2 months, I post via TOR sometimes but not often anymore. I mean honestly I was kinda being a dumbass being smug in the moderation thread itself since I was doing fine before that but being banned is always bullshit and actually reproduces capitalist norms since its enforcing private property. Mods are kulaks since like the kulaks they think they can just ==BANHAMMER== anyone cause its muh property.

Attached: 952.jpg (1280x720, 145.03K)

Same wordfilter on 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 as here, so you're an antisemite now.

People argue back and forth between feminism and anti-feminism all the time, and being against idpol =/= MRA =/= Nazi.

Both feminists and MRAs have good points and absolute retards. They're pretty fucking similar tbhfam.

go back to >>>/reddit/

That poster is kind of obviously from the ShitRedditSays/lefty-reddit milieu.

>>>Zig Forums
The main board for discussing left-wing politics on the site. Split from >>>Zig Forums who wouldn't tolerate non-Nazis. A big chunk of posters on Zig Forums left 4chan during the gamergate thing.
>>Zig Forums
Split from this board after the board owner started banning people over sectarian arguments (happened right after the site got hacked, so a number of people thought the mod team was compromised).
>>/marx/
Made for "serious" discussion but is mostly theory-jerking instead of applying shit to current events and IRL stuff.
>>/leftyb/
Just gonna go ahead and remind people this board exists for shitposting. Too bad almost everyone just shitposts on here and Zig Forums instead.

Zig Forums mod team returns to embarrass themselves again. Just go back.

Good and correct posts. No reason at all they should be controversial, just spergs recoiling at the word feminism.

Attached: 1545663945052.png (1024x769, 655.55K)

Surprised no one here has mentioned that Zig Forums is basically old half-/lit/'s colony. Stirner being in public view again at all started on /lit/.

like this board but slower, with a higher infestation of anarkiddies and other liberals, however the moderation is also less shitty because it's not run by a lunatic
slow board that is actually great for discussion and asking questions, probably my favorite leftist board
dead
dead

sneaky bump

hate me, ban me, I don't care

Maybe for you, but Stirner was always a pretty influential figure within individualist anarchism.
Murray Bookchin was writing polemics about how Stirnerism was anathema to social change way back in the 90s, for instance.
You're giving butterfly a little too much credit.