ROMANOVS REVENGE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ROMANOVS REVENGE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: C55C677F-74AD-46CF-AB16-97D26CF1479C.jpeg (2048x1024, 384.86K)

NOOOO MULTINATIONAL PEOPLE OF THE SOVIET UNION DON'T EAT THAT TRASH FOOD IT'S POISONED WITH C A P I T A L I S M

The doctor vs the candy shop owner

Attached: 30707315-DE8C-477C-AE1D-D4961202843D.png (369x364, 94.34K)

i think you meant drogs, my friend, russian dogs

Attached: capitalism death toll3453.jpg (1023x995, 532.48K)

But this joke doesn't work because everyone was required to work in the USSR so there were no "dregs". The requirement is part of why they were "ebil commies" to liberals.

You’re a brainlet if you don’t think there were drug addicts and alcoholic dregs in the Soviet Union. Working doesn’t nullify this

people still have to work to get by in socialism, you brainlet. There's no propping up. Everything is paid for by people's work. The difference is, the value taken from you is paid back in services completely, whereas under capitalism a portion of that value goes towards some brainlet getting another yacht.

Also,

Wow, such a great economic system. No wonder 66% of Russians want the old system back.

Attached: caloric-consumption-in-ussr.png (640x390, 69.25K)

thanks for accepting this fact

...

Yes and?

Attached: question sumire.png (260x274, 28.58K)

Yes.

Fitting.

Sounds exactly like Russia in 1914

SU was imperialist as fuck

The Warsaw Pact was founded to defend the socialist countries of Europe against NATO. It didn't increase Soviet "control" over these countries except insofar as it helped give a legal basis for military intervention.

Because Khrushchev tried to get rid of Hoxha, whereupon he allied with China and echoed Chinese polemics that Khrushchev and Brezhnev were revisionists representing a party that had restored capitalism in the USSR. They also accused the USSR of being an imperialist power, and of turning the Warsaw Pact into a means of "enslaving" Eastern Europe. So when the Warsaw Pact intervention in Czechoslovakia took place, Albania formally withdrew from the Pact (although it had de facto stopped participating a few years earlier.)

I haven't read up on the Nazino Affair so I can't comment.

What does "empire" mean in this case? I'd say no, since the USSR was neither expansionist nor imperialist. Having a bunch of allied countries did not make it an "empire." It's a word used to demonize the country.

What would you call the soviet invasion of poland, georgia, afghanistan, the baltics, azerbaijan and others? what would you call the sovietization and suppression of the local cultures that it invaded?

necessary
good

The USSR occupied two regions that Poland had forcibly annexed in 1920, hardly an invasion.
The local soviets being overthrown there and the reds intervening to restore them isn't an invasion.
The government requesting military aid against reactionaries is not an invasion
Again, pretty much the only reason there were capitalist governments there is because the German army overthrew the local soviets when they invaded in 1918

But the opposite occurred user