Why do some socialists advocate only for the erradication of financial capital...

Hunter Brown
Hunter Brown

Why do some socialists advocate only for the erradication of financial capital when there exist other forms of capital, such as social, intellectual, physical, cultural, sexual and many others? What makes financial capital the very first target and many times the only one?

Attached: serveimage.jpg (183.77 KB, 1280x720)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=zl1qQeMORT0

Thomas Miller
Thomas Miller

Transparent attempt to sneak in reactionary bullshit.
"Some socialists"
What socialists?
social, intellectual, physical, cultural, sexual and many others?
One of these is not like the others.
What makes financial capital the very first target and many times the only one?
People who only oppose the financial system aren't socialist. They're either utopian liberals with no understanding of economics or anti-Semites who equate finance with muh j00s.

Dylan Miller
Dylan Miller

define "social, intellectual, cultural, sexual" capital

Connor Thomas
Connor Thomas

Bait thread because you're attempting to direct this conversation into idpol territory but there is a reason for certain "Socialists" advocating for the curtailing of Financial Capital, and it has to do with the perversion of Communist Theory by disgusting Post-Keynesians who arbitrarily place moral evaluations on what they consider to be "improper" Capital without understanding the actual material developments that lead to things like Financialization in the first place.

Christian Campbell
Christian Campbell

Also it seems as though you don't actually understand what Capital is, because none of the things you're referring to are Capital in the same way that Communists refer to Capital

Jack Martin
Jack Martin

Some people are just a load of shit who forces people to believe their bottomless assholes are worth enough to be paid for by stealing your exhaustable resources.
That's why these people think there's nothing wrong with being paid for sexual services, when the person being served isn't actually getting anything in return. Who wouldn't have a problem with receiving free stuff to just lay there and take it?

Carter Stewart
Carter Stewart

social, intellectual, physical, cultural, sexual and many others?

Socialism isn't under any delusions that everyone is equal, pretty intelligent people will probably still have easier lives, that's not the concern of socialism (at least not immediately) because it's unavoidable. However, without the shackles of money, you're at least free to find your own community of likeminded individuals, and define status in your own way.

youtube.com/watch?v=zl1qQeMORT0

However, with intellectual capacity in particular, the most gifted will probably have to take on more of the burden of society, after all, everyone would be paid the same amount of labour vouchers (in most conceptions), but a top scientist's labour is worth far far more, he is in effect subsidising the less intellectually able, which is fine, because from each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Able bodied people will be subsidising the disabled in a similar way. So there is fairness, in some sense.

Attached: everything-i-say-is-right-arturo.jpg (86.4 KB, 800x600)

Christopher Russell
Christopher Russell

They won't pay you for your labor but they still want you to pay them to take things away from you. Socialism doesn't believe in your capital.

Gavin Brooks
Gavin Brooks

lmao, will salt rightists ever stop being triggered that they have to pay findoms for attention no other woman will give them.

Tyler Russell
Tyler Russell

Just think of the social media gatherings of people who understand on an intellectual level the physical reality as well as cultural significance of my penis in OP's mouth.

Owen Parker
Owen Parker

I don't want to have sex with women. I want to have sex with farm animals but the people who think they're entitled to my capital don't agree with that. They don't believe in freedom, they don't believe in capital, unless it's free for them to take.
Socialists don't like giving free nothing but they'll take anything they want people to stop doing for free.

Julian Rogers
Julian Rogers

For what it's worth I actually think you should be free to fuck your sheep, but I don't see what this really has to do with socialism.

Socialists don't like giving free nothing but they'll take anything they want people to stop doing for free.

Lawks, I bet you think the Tories and the Democrats are socialist don't you.

Carter Bell
Carter Bell

/thread
Socialism is a high Autism Level chad ideology. Deal with it.

We shouldn't be under any delusions that socialism should make everyone equal, but the social alienation that gives rise to incels will be abolished along with capitalism. Socialism will create a diversity of human life that allows everyone to find their niche.

Mason Bell
Mason Bell

I don't own sheep, I don't like sheep and I can't afford cows or horses because socialists are stealing from me to afford their own. This is why socialists are bad forcing me to have to own animals I don't want and can't afford, yet they won't let me have sex with their animals when they already own them on my back.

This is like people who call sex between two men "gay sex" as if the act of sex belongs to the gays. People won't share what they wrongly call the gays sex but they want to use it to steal whatever belongs to everyone else.
Thanks socialism. I just wanted to have sex with people's farm animals, but dumb fucking socialists think it's wrong to let me do it without stealing something for it.
Socialists are fags and fags are bad.

Gabriel Adams
Gabriel Adams

You are an idiot. Can you buy and sell social, intellectual, physical, cultural, sexual, etc. “capital”? No you cannot. These things are not capital at all, they are personal qualities. One of Marx’s key arguments against capital is precisely how it allows for someone without any personal skills to appropriate those skills from others.
Thus, what I am and am capable of is by no means determined by my individuality. I am ugly, but I can buy for myself the most beautiful of women. Therefore I am not ugly, for the effect of ugliness – its deterrent power – is nullified by money. I, according to my individual characteristics, am lame, but money furnishes me with twenty-four feet. Therefore I am not lame. I am bad, dishonest, unscrupulous, stupid; but money is honoured, and hence its possessor. Money is the supreme good, therefore its possessor is good. Money, besides, saves me the trouble of being dishonest: I am therefore presumed honest. I am brainless, but money is the real brain of all things and how then should its possessor be brainless? Besides, he can buy clever people for himself, and is he who has power over the clever not more clever than the clever? Do not I, who thanks to money am capable of all that the human heart longs for, possess all human capacities? Does not my money, therefore, transform all my incapacities into their contrary?
Capital itself is a social construct, it is a form of property ownership that emerged a couple hundred years ago. Therefore it can be supplanted with a new form of property ownership, collective ownership of the means of production. On the other hand, there has always been people who are more social than others, stronger, smarter, etc. These are personal qualities that cannot and should not be abolished.

Attached: 66738D1F-E36D-4118-A814-0270E3942DB9.gif (53.94 KB, 372x390)

Cooper Diaz
Cooper Diaz

Attached: Base-superstructure-Dialectic.png (186.4 KB, 1680x1646)

Thomas Sanders
Thomas Sanders

I don't own sheep, I don't like sheep and I can't afford cows or horses because socialists are stealing from me to afford their own.

Who are the socialists stealing your cattle exactly. I'm really curious.

This is why socialists are bad forcing me to have to own animals I don't want and can't afford, yet they won't let me have sex with their animals when they already own them on my back.

So you wanna fuck a cow but not do the work of gently looking after her? SMH. Your zoolove is impure and corrupt.

This is like people who call sex between two men "gay sex" as if the act of sex belongs to the gays. People won't share what they wrongly call the gays sex but they want to use it to steal whatever belongs to everyone else.

What the fuck.

Thanks socialism. I just wanted to have sex with people's farm animals, but dumb fucking socialists think it's wrong to let me do it without stealing something for it.

I mean, maybe in socialism there would be beast brothels like in Germany, I don't know, but as of now, it's not socialists taking your money anyway so I have no idea what you're talking about. Just get a horse pussy fleshlight for now like a normal person.

ty ty <3

Attached: thinking.jpg (55.01 KB, 600x832)

Andrew Wright
Andrew Wright

⚠️ The farmcel poster has entered the thread. Zig Forums is not responsible for any (additional) brain damage incurred by reading this thread.

David Jones
David Jones

capital, such as social, intellectual, physical, cultural, sexual and many others?
Qualify and quantify them

Jeremiah Roberts
Jeremiah Roberts

No I said they're stealing from me to afford their cattle.. not that they're stealing cattle from me, because I don't own cattle.

I don't own cattle because the people with cattle seem to want to use their cattle to sexually exploit and steal more from me, by disallowing my first amendment rights to my beliefs in free practice of sex with cows.
I don't know what the cattle owners are losing over anyone having sex with their animals, but whatever it is they must not have been entitled to it in the first place. That's why I can't afford my own cattle because these people are not paying me enough in relation to what they're taking away.

So you wanna fuck a cow but not do the work of gently looking after her?<<
Nobody said I wouldn't look after them but you know it's not right to do that if the owner won't pay me. Most people get paid to look after animals but I'm offering to do it for free because I like animals.
What I see is people are two-faced and sort of messed up in the brain. They want us to buy their stuff but they won't give us the wages to afford it.

They don't want to spend the money on my time but they think there's something wrong with me spending my time with them for free. What are these people thinking other than using their animals to steal my rights and livelihood?

Thomas Mitchell
Thomas Mitchell

Just get a horse pussy fleshlight for now like a normal person.<<

So you're saying normal people buy sex? That's no different than normalizing prostitution, it's sexual exploitation. Sex toys are offense to sex and that's pretty much dehumanization, more likely objectifying people by telling us were not allowed to sexually associate with animals.

Lincoln King
Lincoln King

Conclusion:
Socialists objectify people by disallowing people from having sex with people or animals.

Cooper Clark
Cooper Clark

He's just a retard that shitposts about wanting to fuck animals, I hope he gets skinned alive for all I care.

Caleb Anderson
Caleb Anderson

What makes it a shitpost? It's the only post that isn't about fags niggers and politics. You script kiddies must be having a hard time wrapping your 2 dimensions around that huh?

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit