Can't find anything off a quick google open source nonprofit search engines, source?
Everyone should act in their own self interest
...
theanarchistlibrary.org
The principles of Egoist-Communism or A Union of Egoists in Stirner’s own words
“I am not unselfish so long as the end remains my own, and I, instead of giving myself up to be the blind means of its fulfillment, leave it always an open question.”
“Freedom of thought exists when I can have all possible thoughts; but the thoughts become property only by not being able to become masters.”
“Not against love, but against sacred love, not against thought, but against sacred thought, not against socialists, but against sacred socialists, etc.”
“Free competition is not “free,” because I lack the THINGS for competition.”
“Let it be our affair, then, and let us not let the means that we have to realize value from ourselves be pilfered from us by the rich.”
“You will make an outcry over violence if we reach out our hands and help consume them, and you are right. Without violence we do not get them, as you no less have them by doing violence to us.”
“If men reach the point of losing respect for property, every one will have property, as all slaves become free men as soon as they no longer respect the master as master. Unions will then, in this matter too, multiply the individual’s means and secure his assailed property.”
“What every one requires, every one should also take a hand in procuring and producing.”
“If a society is more than you, then it is more to you than yourself; a union is only your instrument, or the sword with which you sharpen and increase your natural force; the union exists for you and through you, the society conversely lays claim to you for itself and exists even without you, in short, the society is sacred, the union your own; consumes you, you consume the union.”
lol "fulfilling my wife sexually is not "fulfilling" because I lack the THINGS for sexual fulfillment"
You probably have false consciousness if you do, tbh.
I suggest everyone read this book at some point as a companion piece to the ego and it's own.
Of course, that's what I would do too
Isn't that what libertarians say as well?