Huthi rebels use a drone to kill Yemenis during a parade

Huthi rebels have not only managed to construct a prop-driven fixed wing drone, but also figured out a way to strap a load of explosives to it, make it fly over a Yemeni military parade, and detonate it as it passes over the podium.
All while avoiding starvation.
What's your excuse?

At least six have been reported dead so far. Many more are injured. Video evidence has already been uploaded to the internet.
Two current generals and one former general of the Yemeni army have been injured in the attack. Their current medical status is unknown.
Saudis immediately blame Iran without delivering any proofs.

bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-46822429
archive.is/9enIL

Attached: dont film me while i drop my gun pls.jpeg (1920x1080, 191.91K)

Not cool since it sets up a precedent and now saudis can bomb all houtis parades and burials

...

The US has already used their drones to hellfire all over the Huthis. This is more like a strike back using the same/similar weapons.

THATS FUCKING RIGHT
FILTHY SUBHUMAN AMERIMUTTS ARE UNLEASHING HELLFIRE OVER INNOCENT PEOPLE AGAIN
DIE MUTTS DIE
WHY CAN'T YOU LEAVE PEOPLE AND GUNS ALONE
STUPID DUMB MUTT SCUM
GERMANS AND GERMAN AMERICANS SHOULD ROUND UP THE MUTTS AND THE ANGLO AND CHOP THEM TO PIECES

I don't get this meme.

Butthurt kike from muttmerica thinking by repeating things we already agreed with and turn them up to 11 will make the board turn 180.

Why the sage though? Let's have a gud thread shitposting about drones, defense against drones, and how to use drones in a civil war, niggers.

Fuck off, burgers are ok, they - just as all of us - are just fucked over by kikes like you…

Common courtesy regarding meta that isn't thread related.

...

Attached: 15470717528670.jpg (766x720, 71.28K)

Why are they fighting? They should be serving a me slurpy in my local 7/11.

Here in Leafland they just implemented new laws in that regard.
All drones over 250 grams must be registered, and owners must be licensed. They cannot be flown by persons under 14, and since they are technically considering drone operators to be "flight crew", conditions such as excessive tiredness that can make one unfit to pilot a plane will also render you unfit to fly a drone. Drones must be visible within direct, naked-eye line of sight of the operator at all times unless you have a specific license.
Unlicensed operators or operators of unregistered drones faces fines of up to $1000 for individuals, and up to $25,000 for corporations.

Do they regulate RC planes in the same manner?

Ever since (((some guy))) flew a DJI drone carrying "radioactive soild" on top of the PM's residence, the Japanese government regulates drones by
a) although unnecessay for most models, usage of radio waves such so that controlling some drones requires you to have an amateur ham radio license.
b) having to fill in forms and "flight plans" (intent of flying drone, how to assure safety etc) to fly drones and RC planes above a certain weight in areas designated as A,B,C zones -each representing airports and flight paths, high density urban areas, and anywhere higher than 150m from ground level respectively.
Otherwise you're free to fly drones in any other areas for any reason; it's not that great since you can't even use them in parks.

Attached: 001109730.png (866x348, 36.42K)

Hey Nipanon, what's the best country in East Asia besides Japan?

Japan 2

The regulations apply to "navigable aircraft, other than a balloon, rocket or kite, that is operated by a pilot who is not on board"

Not him, but I'd say Taiwan.
I know a Taiwanese girl, she draws a lot of monsterboy porn.

Meant for

They already are regulated, more so than guns in the US, because the FAA is absolutely autistically anal about everything, but for good reason because of the almost always severe consequences if there's an accident. Similar to hot air balloons, drones can't be controlled by an ATC in restricted airspace, meaning that traffic controllers have no clue when or where anyone could be flying a drone. If a drone impacts an aircraft, that aircraft has a pretty good chance of being fucked up and causing an emergency scenario. Just a few weeks ago there was a fiasco with a drone pilot flying his drone during a temporary restricted airspace who lost site of his drone, and it impacted a Blackhawk and came an inch away from completely destroying it and killing everyone on board. The reason for the weight requirement is twofold, a. if it's heavier it generally can fly higher, and b. can cause more damage to aircraft. The reason drones are restricted isn't that they can possibly be used against the government.

Attached: 897fb11e4649fbe0abb3e3780ca42343a5b0f07a39ac80bb8924914996c27342.png (346x320, 126.34K)

I agree, the ban on flying them is restricted airspace is entirely justified.
I'm not entirely convinced by the mandatory licensing and registration though. They found neither the drone nor the operator that was responsible for the Gatwick incident, so even if there had been licensing and registration there'd be no way to connect it to anyone other than "what drone owners live nearby?".

lmao

CHINA NUMBA WAN
In all seriousness however, i would have to go with since Taiwan itself is a developed country and much like Korea, the chinks managed to not fuck up the previous infrastructure that the Japanese had built during Taiwan’s surprisingly prosperous tenure as her colony. Besides the decades-long marshal law that was imposed when the KMT’s power was slipping, i have yet to see any real cultural backwardsness that could rival the mainland chinese.
I guess i could have Singapore as a runner-up but Singapore has ties with the Israelis so some of you might kvetch about that.

Attached: 74C2CDD3-8DB5-441E-A507-950B7B2940DC.jpeg (1920x1080, 1005.16K)

Taiwan is nice, and has a pretty nice gun legislation that is much like America's, with the right to bear arms being written in to law, though I don't know the specifics of Taiwanese legislature. It's a very nice country though; friendly people, and many Japanese speakers. I just want to defend Taiwanese smiles

Other than that, maybe the Philippines? They have a pretty strong gun culture, despite their laws; I know Indonesia is strict in legislature too, but there was some fuss about the police essentially handing out gun licenses on a shall issue basis some time back.


I can understand and appreciate air safety, but I live in Tokyo which I do plan on moving out of once I graduate Uni and there are many parks that are sizeable and opened enough for a flight. It's just a pain in the arse to have to wait 10 days to get approval every time you go out to fly.
It would be nice if there were outdoor "Drone/RC parks", but I've not heard back from the local council regarding that.

Taiwan is what China could have been like had it not been poisoned with Marxism.

Taiwan is what China could have been like had it been put under the Japanese sphere of influence; polite, not fervently niggerish, and humble. 2.28 massacre, don't forget. 狗去豬來

polite sage for off topic

Attached: 47e852d68230ea7d10c2ac6f9808fe8b454f917ba61626b2c9928dcb8bd4f51a.jpg (320x320, 23.61K)

Was the same not true of Hong Kong before the Eternal Anglo had no choice but to give it up, which while unfortunate for its people was unavoidable in the circumstances?

Hong Kong would still be British territory if the iron maiden wasn't made of tinfoil.

We only had to give away the New Territories but Thatcher gave it all away because it wouldn't have been manageable without that land really should've given it Taiwan for the top tier banter

Holy shit, a fucking yid is posting about it.

Heil Hitler, eh, yid?

Shalom, spermuttgookkike, and happy hannukah.
reported again for ban evasion, spermutt

Wow holy fucking shit, so I was right all along, the muttspammer is a damn yid.

Reported and filtered.

Reported AND FILTERED.

Attached: Yid muttspammer.png (1244x772, 32.9K)

H-how could you do that to your greatest ally? ;_;

Attached: imagine my shock.jpg (1280x720, 65.98K)

I think 2 shill groups use Zig Forums as battleground.

U.S. should ideally support Houthis in order to curb Saudi Arabia.
Yea or Nay and why?

I had actually heard that Indonesia was incredibly strict even by asian standards where spent cartridges were considered firearms and you could be prosecuted for losing them.

Thailand has fairly liberal gun laws and most other things but only for citizens.

Why? Saudis have sided with the US since forever

Yea. Dead saudis are always a good thing.

You realize they literally, unironically and physically did 9/11, no?

...

Anons, Sauds have been bombing civilians indiscriminately and deliberately created a humanitarian crisis of mass starvation and cholera epidemy. They also use literal child soldiers from Sudan. Sauds don't give a shit about international law because they know USA will shield them from any criticism. Not that there will be much criticism, because nobody reports on what's happening in Yemen – there's a media blackout on it that's been going on for years, precisely so that the public doesn't know of the shit Sauds are pulling. So no, this doesn't set up a precedent for sauds to bomb parades and burials, since that's what they've been doing for years now anyway.

What's next, hoping your government will attack Israel?

the group that fights against those who control a significant part of the US government*
FUCK

...

This.