BOOM! Sweden Parliament Dismisses Pro-EU Prime Minister Löfven

NEPTUNE'S SUCH GOOD NEWS

Significantly, it was historic President Trump critic and former Swedish PM Mr Carl Bildt who announced the news on Twitter, stating: “First time ever in Sweden the Parliament dismisses a sitting government. PM Löfven dismissed, but remains in caretaker functions until a new government is formed.”

Mr Bildt rose to fame last year when he criticized the US President for predicting that Sweden would have problems with its immigration population after having admitted so many since 2015. In the last election, the anti-immigrant party Sweden Democrats took nearly 20% of the vote.

Yes, Sweden, one of the EU’s ultimate socialist paradises has seen its leftwing government Prime Minister just voted out of office for the first time ever after he lost the general election just two weeks ago.

It will now be up to the leader of the Sweden Moderates, Mr Ulf Kristersson, to form a government.

He has two choices, either try to form a government with the leftwing bloc with all political parties except for the Sweden Democrats in a grand coalition (however it then would become quite certain that the next election they would get even more votes if you do not execute their policy proposals), or, as happened in Austria, form a government of conservatives with the rightwing nationalist party.

archive.fo/A2Ki8

The move means Löfven, whose centre-left bloc won 144 seats in parliament on 9 September to the centre-right’s 143, will have to step down eventually but will stay on in a caretaker capacity until a new administration can be formed, which could take weeks.

The speaker of the parliament, Andreas Norlén, is expected to meet the leaders of the eight parties represented in Sweden’s Riksdag over the next few days to determine who is best placed to try to piece together the country’s next government.

Most analysts expect Norlén to first approach Ulf Kristersson, the leader of the Moderate party, the largest member of the four-party centre-right Alliance.

“Sweden needs a new government that has broad political support to undertake reforms,” Kristersson said moments before Tuesday’s vote, which passed by a majority of 59 in the 349-seat house.

Quite where Kristersson might get that support from, however, is far from clear. With his centre-right grouping of the Moderate, Centre, Liberal and Christian Democrat parties in a minority, he will need the support of either the centre-left or of the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats, whose 62 MPs backed the no-confidence motion.

archive.fo/4xZGU

Attached: Sweden Parliament Dismisses Pro-EU Prime Minister Löfven.jpg (636x382, 66.21K)

Thank you Neptune for this great news! /killcen/ provides you 100 sheckles and a Good!

bump

bumping real

Burger here.
Can someone give me a short synopsis using the (((2 party))) political system the US uses?
The European parties are all named in confusing manners and my burger can't take it.

See that confuses me.

In sweden there is the Marxist liberals (Social Democrats) and the Nationalist liberal party (Sweden Democrats). The Sweden Democrats are anti-amnesty liberals. The Social Democrats are basically a Soros globalist party. The Sweden Democrats gained the third most popular vote which threw the political establishment into a rut.

The 'conservative' party got second, only thinly trailing the commie Social Democrats. So now the Social Democrats (commie Marxists) are having a problem forming a govt coalition and their main leader got his ass kicked out.

Okay but "nationalist liberal" is a false title. It goes against liberal ideology to be nationalist as the reverse.

Well typically yes, but Sweden is very "diverse", yes even in politics. It may not make much sense to the average American but there are "leftwing liberals" and "rightwing liberals" over there… I know its hard to explain but basically the strongest leftist party is losing control, and the more moderate liberal party (who doesn't want to be invaded by migrants) are establishing more political control.

So what we see is a slow defection away from the establishment.

I can understand "further left than this other left liberal party".
The thing I'm at odds with is the premise of a liberal party being nationalist. It doesn't work. It can't work. It would be like saying a vacuum full of matter.
And I don't like it.

Its strange for sure. Basically the ONLY difference between the Social Democrats and Sweden Democrats is the open border / amnesty issue. Some could say the Sweden Democrats are more "nationalist" for being against open borders. That doesn't mean they still aren't leftist on most other policies.

The best way to describe it in American terms: imagine if there were some Democrats who opposed gun control but on every other issue they remained leftist. And suppose that the 'pro-2nd Amendment Democrats' actually put up a good right and gained Congressional seats. Something similar is happening over the migration issue in Sweden.

who could be sliding this?

Well I'm kinda wrong I guess in hindsight as the NSDAP was very liberal, but only after nationalism was achieved. Which is fine. I guess it's just hard to differentiate shit because so much is forced (((progressive))). But the example helped.

European politics can be tricky to learn, some parties are not really traditional "left" or "right" but sway in various issues.

BOOM!

I might as well bump this every time Neptune bumps his stupid articles.

REAL

SUCH NEWS

anti-slide