If the problem of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church is caused by homosexual clergy...

If the problem of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church is caused by homosexual clergy, then how come we don't see this level of sexual abuse in the Anglican Communion? Most of their clergy is homosexual.

Attached: gq-features-070108-GQfeature3v.jpg (800x1000, 110.73K)

Other urls found in this thread:

westernbuddhistreview.com/vol3/homosexuality.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

because nobody takes episcopalians seriously.

It's caused by celibacy and such is probably behind much of the homosexuality in other sexually repressive societies like Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Here's an article I have bookmarked on homosexuality in Buddhist tradition.
westernbuddhistreview.com/vol3/homosexuality.html

Attached: 1430038066847.webm (568x320, 2.99M)

There are problems on the other side. We have a problem with heterosexual clergy right now, who can't seem to resist marrying a pretty girl from their flocks, and it's glossed over. It needs to stop.

Also, you shouldn't have the same priest in a parish for north of 10 years. That's not healthy.

Why don't we see?

Because as far as I know their isn't a large scale effort to cover up these things like there was in the Catholic Church which probably made the situation even worse because it emboldened clergy who otherwise might not never acted on the impulses for fear of being outed.

The main difference now compared to 16 years ago when the Dallas event happened is the internet has made it impossible to just sweep it under the rug like they were going to do and have admitted they were going to do.

Both the claims that it is caused by celibacy and by homosexuality are completely idiotic. I am sorry to say this.

The rate of pedophilia in the Catholic Church is actually lower than in schools. However, clergymen look out to each other, because of misunderstandings about sexual offenses, because of the fear of losing clergymen when there are already not many, and because of plain old corruption. What will solve this issue is not to let priests marry, or to kick out any priest who admits to homosexual tendencies. What will solve this issue is to apply St Basil the Great's canon to the letter:

And this decision must come from the Pope himself.

It'd be much easier to just defrock them, I think.

I think an example has to be made out of them.

Publically scourging a pedophile in St. Peter's square before defrocking him (this is what removing the tonsure would be the old equivalent of) would be pretty bad ass, though, and much more of a deterrant than mere defrocking.