Race, Nationalism, and Culture

Why is Chrisitianity so against the protection of race, nationality and culture?

I thought God hated the fact that the people of Babel where race mixing trying to become one race

Yet God doesn't specifically of avoiding mass race mixing,or loss of culture, maybe only through vague stories with certain context

Is race and culture really that null and void in God's eyes, doesn't he know the harms of racemixing (transplant issues, disgenics, identity crisis in children) or the effects of having a multicultural and multiracial society?

Attached: 7e7ac15af0e91a960e2ef81d533d99d1f41172717e81be3f269a8f78fa77af3a.jpg (255x91, 8.2K)

Does anybody have a larger pic of what OP posted?

It's not that Christianity is against the protection of race, nationality and culture; it's that Zig Forums gets their panties in a bunch when they're called out for making their whiteness into a religion.

the issue was their pride in thinking they can reach or surpass Heaven via their efforts. So they got humbled and dispersed.

the culture God wants us to preserve is the Christian culture. The other stuff is secondary.

There's no intrinsic harm in racemixing, the fact that your kids might get bullied by others is an external problem, your kids might get bullied for following Christianity as well, or being White.
so rare

God wants us to transcend these petty issues, not to live in fear and paranoia of anything earthly.
Liberal/atheistic multiculturalism has utterly failed, but that doesn't mean different groups can never live side by side in peace.

Once upon a time Christianity was based and defended all those things you’re talking about. But recently, men decided they get to choose what’s God’s will and what’s not and created the same problem with religious institutions in Jesus’ time. I predict it won’t be long before we start seeing a rise in conversions to judaism.

God blessed and favored Whites when WE were on HIS side. Spreading Christianity and btfoing (((pagans))) and (((synagogues of satan))).

Attached: Chosen People.jpg (160x200, 13.2K)

Now the issue of uncontrolled immigration is a political issue not a religious one.

Yes.

Attached: 2d6mws.jpg (1361x485, 210.16K)

this

it isn't.
He isn't. It is common sense though. Mention that God does not tel anywhere "If you racemix you're somehow better" as liberals seem to think. God is not against protection of your people. If you love your people and culture (you should as a Christian..) you are not likely to racemix anyway - it leads to all sorts of problems (identity of your children, one parent is out of his homeland among foreigners, recall the tower of Babel, multicultural societies just does not work).
I think it is implied in the old Testament few times. Yes, there is no commadnment "do not race mix". As there is not "do not cut your leg with a knife" will you do that and blame God he does not specifically tells me not to do it.
You should not listen to people who try to make their ethnicity to a false religion. Those will always come up with "muh Bible does not forbid da racemixing therefore Christianity not true religio n". They think they may make their ideas into religion.

Lol. When did this happen in history? Your thesis "it just has to work" is just wishful thinking. Show me multiculturalism that is not liberal. Multiculturalism is Liberalism.
They are not. It is difficult to find a donor among your fellow countrymen, let alone from somebody of a different race. You probably do not know much about it. It is rather unlikely you'd find an interracial donor in most transplantations.
How about that the kid does not even know where he belongs,who he is? He has literally no culture?

Christ was not against rendering unto Caesar that which belonged to Caesar. All he asked was that we rendered unto God what belongs to god. Christ counselled that the lord does not need our money, that we cannot comfort the lord with our vengeful protection, nor impress the lord with our brilliance, nor do any single thing that the lord needs. All we were given was free choice, and so all that god lacks is our choice to treat his children with love. Therefore dance with Caesar, break bread with patriots, and defend your anointed sovereign as David defended Saul. It is all as nothing, next to the obligation we owe to the one true sovereign, which is the love of each other.

Peace will always be transient given a long enough time horizon. We live in a fallen world.

Singapore has a pretty diverse population of races and religions yet it's functioning smoothly, with low crime, high employment and gdp and quality of life. If we're going off objective/materialist standards its definitely not a failed form of multiculturalism. Not yet anyway.

yes it's already difficult to find donors in any case, so does this mean we should stop having kids? its also rather unlikely they'll need any such donor, ever. It's very rare.

A child raised to be Christian will know he belongs to God and his destiny is into eternity. He isn't just a conglomeration of race/gender/nationality but much more. Those are important for pragmatic issues, but they do not offer meaning in themselves, they do not explain origin, nor final purposes.

"doesn't he know the harms of racemixing"

Like your conception of our lord, I am also ignorant of such genetic theory. Perhaps you could write down your wisdom for god, and slip it to him quietly, in order to spare the divine embarrassment, as it humbles itself before you own wisdom.

For myself, I hesitate to inquire anything of a mind which understands itself above the lord.

Beware a lack of sin, my friend, for it is a quality found in men who crush the skulls of their enemies to drink their spiritual essence. May god bless you with experience of black, yellow, white and every kind of man, who is seized of the holy spirit, who knows a living god. When you have met a black man who would lay down his life top protect his women, and his fellow christians, who lives in the light of christ, then you will understand the answer to your own question. Until then, you live and learn by the grace of such men.

This. Multiculturalism fails today because there is no core of unifying values.

It's a bad example though, they have a quota by law to keep the population 75% Chinese.

This.

Personally I'm not against race-mixing and never was, but the real problem is when it's being pushed as an agenda and I do understand the concerns when they say things like white isn't real and basically trying to undermine us.
It isn't helpful and only fuels the problems we have these days.

The native of the neighbour nation is fine, within the continent is fine; but too far across the genetic board then problems starts to appears. Both physically, mentally, and socially. Nothing too serious (in most cases), but remember that it is the child who carry this burden. Especially in this dark time where races and identity are used as bullets for political mudflinging. The child will likely find themselves lost as in no sense of identity, community, and belonging.

t. mongrel

I'd add that the problem is more potent when race mixing is heavily enforced under lies and false pretenses.

either way Singapore is multiracial and multicultural/multi-religious.

Attached: Singapore Religions.PNG (1039x694, 21.75K)

They weren't even separate races yet. They were a mere two generations removed from Noah's family; Nimrod was his great-grandson. God disrupted their project to force them to disperse and fill the Earth, an explicit command that He gave.

The people pushing this mass immigration, miscegenation, and globalization seem to think the same thing judging by their art. An individual practicing miscegenation is walking a dangerous line. Odds are they're fully on board with everything globohomo is pushing. Even if miscegenation itself isn't necessary a sin, like alcohol, it is opening you up to fall.

Attached: eu_parliament_tower_of_babel_poster_02_by_nixseraphd5tv76z.jpg (640x480, 91.08K)

Singapore enforces multiculturalism through the law. They defined the various races in Singapore and forced them to conform to the definitions. E.g. at its founding 2% of the Chinese population knew Mandarin, but the government defined Chinese people as being Mandarin speakers, so they were all forced to speak Mandarin as their first language. Same thing with Indians, defined as Tamil speakers, when most were not. Some Singaporean Indians cannot even speak to their extended families overseas, because they don't know Hindi.

In that country people cannot offend any religion, and I believe proselytizing is frowned upon by the police, for fear of stoking racial tensions. Fuzzy racial definitions have been made clear cut, and the people have been forced by the law and courts to conform to them.

If a nation is an extended family, then it is obvious that a Christian should not act in a way to actively undermine it any more than he should not act to undermine his close family. This means that to an extent that, say, mass immigration is destructive to the stability or welfare of a nation, it is possible to present Christian arguments against it.

What you shouldn't do it is to idolize it, like the Nazis or the alt-right do. Mit Brennender Sorge is a nice explanation on the subject.

OK now post a smaller pic than OP posted.

Because first, worrying about the future of your race, nation, or whatever means that you have no faith in God. The only thing you're supposed to be worried about is whether or not you're fit enough to be in heaven. Second, the practice of eugenics, segregation, and deportation are often inhumane. We are supposed to share, and there's no spiritual consequences in suffering for the poor. Third, these political issues are something beyond our control, our intellectual capacity and observational capability have their limits. Let God sort it out, our only responsibilities are to pay taxes, vote, and pray for our leaders.

No suffering is null and void in His eyes. Humans are meant to suffer and learn from their suffering. To learn to accept God's love is Man's only responsibility on earth. Life was too good in the mega-civilization of Babel, where there was no diversity to divide their society, and Man became contemptuous of God.

The problem with race mixing in the Bible is usually in an attempt to please whatever other group an Israelite was marrying into, the Israelite would convert to their religion and way of thinking. True, that still goes on today (we all know about that one soyboy who converted to Islam or started wearing a dashiki to seem more open to other cultures), but usually as long as you don’t marry someone who isn’t Christian (or from a denomination that’s too different from your own) or political/moral viewpoint, you should be fine. Keep your cultures seperate (if that’s even something important to them), although like said, Christian culture and beliefs should always come first and you should find someone who feels the same.

Here you go.

Attached: deae9ac9390c746d90b26ac9c1db9c01bfeb9226a0dc7f4fac0f2d70adc5c91c.jpg (26x10, 999)

Culture and race changes and mutates over centuries, are you wondering why an all knowing God isn't a Zig Forumstard? I believe that this is part of why the Jew's betrayed God and had Christ crucified, they wanted a cosmic Jewish Hitler to glorify their ethnic tribe and that wasn't what they got