They're pretty assuredly not feminists. It's a move straight from "identity should not be a barrier to agency" to "the only role allowed for a given identity is that of agencyless victim in need of third-party protectionism."
There's a name for wanting wymmynz back in the kitchen. It's not feminism.
About a third of the populace are actual pedos…
….specifically, a small subset. Meanwhile, it's easy as shit to get some organophosphates, mix them into a smokebomb, and wipe out a whole city.
You… might want to start quaking a little more seriously. We haven't started counting the toddler-attracted, boylovers, or the ephebophiles like this clown. Trying to waste about 2/3rds of the populace in a nazi-tier idpol society is unlikely to go well.
Getting closer : US, UK, Oz. Angloworld. The UK began before the US.
I mean, you're not wrong.
A homosexual man would find neither attractive, thus equally attractive. A pedophile would find neither attractive, thus equally attractive. An exclusive zoophile would find neither attractive, thus equally attractive. A conventional mainstream hetero dude, while fairly well outnumbered by either pedophiles or ephebophiles, would go for the middle-aged old woman. A gerontophile would consider them both too young.
A lesbian would consider the teenager "too old," but still might go for it; look up Sappha sometime and find out what the real story was.
It's one of the great ideas of the Left; you can't, actually, just externally declare one thing for billions of people. If you could, Fascism would be great; just find the one thing that the billions of clones want, and impose it! Instead, however… that doesn't work, and you need self-management for each to express their own agency; Marx's (rest in piss for fucking up muh First) commentary on a janitor in the morning, musician at night, scientist or crafter at noon were all about the fact that narrow constriction to a single plan doesn't even work in a single person.
So, ya can't make those kinds of blanket statements.
Nah, it's moralizing and problematic when outsiders fuck with this. National liberation and m3w are crap, but they are slightly better than white people crossing oceans to teach little brown people "right, white" morality… something that should have been axed BEFORE spain's Christianization of mexico.
Let the folks who are there figure out how they feel about this. Lynch the guy, buy him a drink, whatever. Massive french presence in SE asia isn't charitable.
I'm all for supporting the workers themselves in their own complaints; different tendencies are right for different situations, and AnSyn is awesome there. Socialism is not, however, wypipo conquering colonies to tell nonwhite people that they're not doing it the white way.
Have you ever considered that identities don't matter, and that self-determination without masters just MIGHT be a good way to do things?
…because I don't have a lot of faith. You can't muster a single drop of self-determination without masters - which WOULD prevent most problems - in your writings, so I don't really have a lot of faith in your commitment to it. It's not even "an unfortunate implication of my ideology which conflicts with my social conditioning," you don't even think of people as living without masters even briefly.
You could prevent a lot of child abuse simply by NOT "getting people to their parents," though. You could prevent even more by building a world in which everyone was free to exercise their agency under their own wishes and had the experience of self-management. But self-management without masters isn't even a distant hypothetical in your world, is it?