How do you follow Jesus' words without being a total cuck?

It looks like to me that most Christians don't actually follow Jesus' words and would probably laugh at you and call you a cuck if you did obey the scripture below. How on earth do you obey Jesus without being a cuck? I just can't wrap my mind around it. It makes no sense to me. This reads like something some cucked liberal would post on their tumblr. I'm not trying to blaspheme or anything. I honestly don't understand how you can follow this stuff without getting run over and destroyed by the real world. Can someone please once and for all finally explain?

27 But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,

28 Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you.

29 And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloak forbid not to take thy coat also.

30 Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again.

31 And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.

32 For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them.

33 And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same.

34 And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again.

35 But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil.

36 Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.

37 Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:

Attached: 6785647876987.jpeg (225x225, 10.88K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newadvent.org/summa/3040.htm
newadvent.org/summa/3044.htm
biblicalselfdefense.com/
firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2017/09/christianity-is-for-cucks
twitter.com/AnonBabble

One day you will get finally get it, young padawan.

Why should you care what people think about you? If you're afraid of looking like a cuck to others then you really are just cucking yourself to others anyways. Be in the world but not of the world, don't compromise the commandments of God for your own gratification.

...

To quote Max Scheler:
The forces and laws which rule the evolution of life and the formation and development of political and social communities, even wars between nations, class struggle, and the passions they entail—all those are taken for granted by Jesus as permanent factors of existence. He does not want to replace them by love or anything else. Such demands as universal peace or the termination of the social power struggle are entirely foreign to his religious and moral sermon. The “peace on earth” for which he asks is a profound state of blissful quietude which is to permeate, as from above, the historical process of struggle and conflict which governs the evolution of life and of human associations. It is a sacred region of peace, love, and forgiveness, existing in the depth of man‟s soul in the midst of all struggle and preventing him from believing that the goals of the conflict are ultimate and definitive. Jesus does not mean that the struggle should cease and that the instincts which cause it should wither away. Therefore the paradoxical precept that one should love one‟s enemy is by no means equivalent to the modern shunning of all conflict. Nor is it meant as a praise of those whose instincts are too weak for enmity (Nietzsche speaks of the “tamed modern gregarious animal”)! On the contrary: the precept of loving one‟s enemy presupposes the existence of hostility, it accepts the fact that there are constitutive forces in human nature which sometimes necessarily lead to hostile relations and cannot be historically modified. It only demands that even the true and genuine enemy—he whom I know to be my enemy and whom I am justified in combating with all means at my disposal—should be my “brother in the kingdom of God.” In the midst of the struggle, hatred should be absent, especially that ultimate hatred which is directed against the salvation of his soul. There is no value in the disappearance or moderation of revenge, power, mastery, and subjugation which are acknowledged as belonging to a complete living being. The virtue lies in the free sacrifice of these impulses, and of the actions expressing them, in favor of the more valuable act of “forgiveness” and “toleration.” Indeed one cannot “forgive” if one feels no revenge, nor can one “tolerate” if one is merely insensitive. Thus the greatest mistake would be to interpret the Christian movement on the basis of dim analogies with certain forms of the modern social and democratic movement. Jesus is not a kind of “popular hero” and “social politician,” a man who knows what ails the poor and the oppressed, an “enemy of Mammon” in the sense that he opposes capitalism as a form of social existence. Yet Friedrich Nietzsche‟s own conception of Christianity is strongly influenced by this widespread Jesus picture, which was propagated by Christian and non-Christian socialists. Therefore he thinks that the motives and arguments which set him against modern Socialism and Communism also apply to Christian morality and its genius. But Nietzsche‟s attack touches Jesus and the core of Christianity as little as the praise of those “socialists,” since both share the same mistaken premise. Christianity does not contain the germ of modern socialist and democratic tendencies and value judgments. Nor did it ever affirm the “equality of souls before God,” to which Nietzsche always points as the root of democracy—except in the sense that God‟s judgment on men is preceded by an elimination of the value delusions which are due to human situations, to human narrow-mindedness, blindness, and selfinterest. But the notion that all men are equivalent “in God‟s eyes,” that all value distinctions and the whole value aristocracy of human existence are merely based on anthropomorphic prejudice, onesidedness, and weakness, is reminiscent of Spinoza and entirely foreign to Christianity. It is in radical contradiction with ideas such as “heaven,” “purgatory,” “hell,” and with the whole internally and externally aristocratic structure of Christian-ecclesiastic society—a structure which is continued and culminates in the invisible kingdom of God. The autochthonous Christian notion would rather be the opposite: that God sees an immeasurable abundance ofdifferences and value distinctions where our eyes, fixed on outward appearances, see nothing but a seeming uniformity in the values of men, races, groups, and individuals. According to Pascal, even the human “spirit” is characterized by the ability to grasp the inner difference between men below their uniform appearance.

And here's another quote of his that wouldn't fit in the previous post:
Even the precepts “Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you, bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you. And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek, offer also the other: and him that taketh away thy cloak, forbid not to take thy coat also” (Luke 6:27-29) do not demand a passivity which is only “justified” by the inability to seek revenge (as Nietzsche wrongly thought). Nor do they seek to shame the enemy in secret vengefulness, or indicate a hidden self-torment which satisfies itself through paradoxical behavior. These precepts demand an extreme activity against the natural instincts which push us in the opposite direction. They are born from the Gospel‟s profound spirit of individualism, which refuses to let one‟s own actions and conduct depend in any way on somebody else‟s acts. The Christian refuses to let his acts be mere reactions —such conduct would lower him to the level of his enemy. The act is to grow organically from the person, “as the fruit from the tree.” “A good man out of the good treasure of his heart, bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure, bringeth forth evil things.” “For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.” (Matthew 12:34 and 35). What the Gospel demands is not a reaction which is the reverse of the natural reaction, as if it said: “Because he strikes you on the cheek, tend the other”—but a rejection of all reactive activity, of any participation in common and average ways of acting and standards of judgment

True. It is not an easy thing to do sometimes. Everyone has their own fee-fees on certain matters and think they know better than God.
I'm not interested in what people think of me. All people can do is laugh and call me names. God can burn me for eternity. Choose wisely.
Maybe you should stop thinking of God as a "cuck".

Attached: 123r.jpg (960x951, 88.65K)

Get thee behind me, fedora.

...

I think you're fixated. Being a cuck will result in very bad things physically happening to you, not just fleeting judgements. Cucking out to a bully will result in him continuing to bully you.

He was a Catholic when he wrote that and it's still a fair point regardless of who wrote it.

12 men were "cucks" and the world ended up under Christian rule for several centuries.

we will be like the angels in heaven, not given in marriage to one another

Christianity conquered the world because of Constantine.

ok

the point of Christ's teaching on this, besides telling us what Heaven is like, is that the vocation of marriage is not binding in Heaven

so if you allow the fear of adultery to separate you from God and His Commandments, then you will be set aside from God.

the judgement of the world is nothing in contrast to the Judgement of Christ

Read your Summa fam. It explains stuff like this very well.
newadvent.org/summa/3040.htm
newadvent.org/summa/3044.htm

God, stop being so cringey and man up. The Bible tells you to defend yourself. Such verses are for shaming people when they do unjust things, not when they are literally going to beat you.

I can't understand that stuff. The words are too big. Someone has to explain it to me.

But I don't want to disobey Jesus. We must always obey the Lord our God.

It basically says that we not only have the right, but the duty to fight if not doing so would result in an evil act being committed. This article is much easier to read than the Summa if you want something more in depth than my explanation.
biblicalselfdefense.com/

I don't think you understand what eternity is.

Are you saying to submit to bullies for life or go to hell?

Attached: 9F56E3B9-DE65-42B9-A143-20E1CC774E31.jpeg (400x400, 38.6K)

Being charitable, merciful, and forgiving isn't cucked. It takes bigger balls to do any of these than it does to being a vengeful ass. But this passage isn't saying that you shouldn't stand up for yourself, it's saying that you should ignore petty slights against you.

Mark and Matthew are where the raw story is.

True, but that doesn't mean you can't defend yourself

see pic

Attached: Christianity redpill_2.png (1532x2582, 1.24M)

This is the Alpha mindset that is immune to trolling and faggotry and walks through the world with ease and confidence.
How can you not see this OP? Vid related, who is superior ??

This.

this

Attached: 1500709695789.png (150x100, 15.91K)

Jesus also drove the money changers from the temple. Money changers = usurers = chargers of interest = international financiers. I'm not advocating violence against bankers, but their entire modus operandi is, according to Jesus, antichristian. Mammonism has no place in christianity. After Christianity purges this cancer from the body of the church, then the congregation can be peaceful agrarians/workers or "deus vult" crusaders.

On an unrelated note, why is freemasonry filled with white collar types.? Shouldn't their membership be comprised of masons who are free rather than wagecucks who serve mammon? I Aint even gonna start on public schools, Hollywood, sjws, etc. I'm so sick and tired of my entire culture getting subverted and inverted and perverted by 'pharasites'.

Pic kinda related

Attached: 8fbee025b19eba3f219c6376c05c59ad0dffa5992e15563fff1ff486a8fd5bfb.jpg (2400x1800, 935.62K)

In those days, this was how the Jewish second-class citizen would intelligently defend himself against the harassment of Roman soldiers. It was meant to create an unwinnable situation for the Roman soldier such as treating the Jew as an equal or having to publicly beg the Jew to give his belongings back. Christ gave them real world examples of fighting smart.

Today, most of these ways of fighting back are done with words. "B-but what about a fight?" you say. If it comes to that, use the aggressor's weight and momentum against him. Learn to subdue the guy without serious injury and without killing him (as best you can). God gave you a body with a brain. Use them both. You can figure out how to defend yourself without sinning.

Get this nonsense internet meme trash out of your head. Grow up and get it together. You sound like you live and die on internet meme culture. Live and die on the belief in the Lord Jesus Christ. I'm sure you're a confident uncuckable alpha male so I don't expect this to offend you. Although, yes, you blasphemed and offended God with this vomit you served as sincerity. You and I know that you could have typed this with much better use of your intellect and respect for the Lord. Why on earth would you reference that you aren't trying to blaspheme? Hint, when you feel the need to say or type that, you're blaspheming. You said the Son of God sounded like a cucked liberal. What went through that meme-stained, pea-sized brain of yours to delude you into thinking that's an acceptable way to speak about the Lord? May God have mercy on us.

Repent and believe the Gospel, or burn in the fires of perdition. Welcome to Zig Forums, user. I'll be praying for you.

Well you have to admit, the jews did a marvelous job of shifting language and culture in such a way that the sermon on the mount sure sounds like liberal cuckoldry in the modern cultural context.

If only there was a way to preserve the accuracy of the meaning of words throughout time with a trusted group of interpreters guided by the Holy Spirit to preserve those teachings through cultural shifts, and prevent personal interpretation from diluting and perverting the teachings of Christ.

Jesus forbids adultery.

Christianity is for cucks.

firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2017/09/christianity-is-for-cucks