Be me

Next time in religious propaganda class bring up "sicut judaeis" and if that charlatan of a teacher even knows about it, ask why today only excerpts of the first part are mentioned. As for your daily school struggle…find a bunch of like-minded kids in your class or from school and stage a boycott against harmful indoctrination. Do this by sitting together and teaching each other about a related, but more valuable topic. Let the spirit of boycotting Marxist propaganda travel, by discrediting official curriculum and offering kids a group learning circle. A great topic would be basic philosophy about current problems. Don't rebel against authority, but boycott harmful teachings. Don't back down, get parents involved, and if it blows up into expulsions. gather together in study groups while openly defiling the state curriculum.

What you have to understand is that modern school systems are over, that we are in an occupied nation, and that your future will not be in this system anymore. So you have to find alternative means to support yourself and help others. This sounds terrifying at first, but you will soon find out how much more you can learn outside this nightmare by doing it yourself. Good luck!

Ah, that reminds me of something stupid I witnessed today.

The thing is, this is not a school, this is a private course..but i could try that.

Not a school, just a single class from a private course…my parents are paying for this and the classes are good content wise, but the constant preaching and subtle critiques makes me mad. There are some good teachers, like the history teacher (ironically) who encouraged us to read the bible.

That's really good. I will be entering college in this year or the next one, but it will be a STEM course, so i won't be expecting too much nonsense..damn i really have to build to courage to speak out.

Do not let these moments pass and start networking a counter culture. Reject, boycott, expand, offer an alternative. It's a war for your future, don't be a spectator.

Is that really a hill you are willing to die on?

I thought about it,and i'm not so sure. I mean what's the point. They're all going to have the same feminist worldview..i spoke with an atheist friend about this, and he still rejected the facts. I don't feel like doing that at all anymore, and my contempt and hatred for the modern world is just growing..

sorry for being a little black pilled, and sounding like a coward, but this whole thing leaves me disgusted and i doubt there are people in my class that will be at my side anyway. Today after class i spoke with a prottie girl, she seems pretty trad in manners and views of marriage and so on, but even her was unphased and uninstered in my words..she seemed like the typical anti-catholic protestant, bu whatever..i wasn't interested anyways.

I've talked about this quite a bit with my priest and it isn't about being blackpilled necessarily… We are not called to seek out martyrdom. We are called to speak the truth, but standing up in class and giving a dissertation on the faith is first of all going to be unconvincing to most of your classmates, and second of all going to severely negatively impact your own future. Of course there's always the chance that we will turn the heart of some cold unrepentant sinner, and that this negative reaction is merely part of the cross we must bear in this world. That being said, let's go ahead and apply Occam's razor and say the real reason you would speak up isn't from a place of love and sincere desire for the salvation of the others involved, but rather an impulse to justify yourself and your beliefs. Exercise careful discernment. I found myself in the latter camp, and though I don't doubt you to be holier than I, it is worth significant meditation and prayer before any Christian undertakes such a trial.

I mean, it's not about me. I know the truth, but i get worried about other people being deceived..but never mind. I will pray for them instead.

My advise is to emphasize first and foremost that the teacher has no right to impose his personal biased opinion on his students. The duty of the teacher is to give the students well sourced, well researched facts and let them make their own conclusions. If he doesn't do that and instead insidiously impels his students to hold the same opinions, then he's a failure as a teacher. From his discussion, it's clear he's passing off, pardon my latin, bullshit cliches about medieval society as the truth, which could be easily blasted apart with even a smattering of the facts, which you should deliver in your next class to his face without mercy. But the main point you should drive is that his instruction is ideologically driven, and as such inappropriate for the educational setting.

What? There are tons of writings from women from the middle ages. Marie de France, Christine de Pizan, Heloise just to name a few.

catholic church is half the reason why most people were literate in the west after rome's fall

well, among those who were literate I mean

You're 500 years too late, bud.

I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
John 17:14

And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.
1 John 5:19

If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. John 15:19-20

Attached: KJV_1.jpg (480x360, 9.29K)

What do you mean by this?

Most people couldn't.

that's just flat out lies though. Some nuns were able to write and read, Hildegaard, for example, wrote a lot of music and books. It's just that, unlike today, women weren't running around chasing """success""" and instead were chasing vocation.

Most people couldn't read and write, historically.
Submissive somehow implies men were tyrannical or that women didn't have autonomy in their own spheres.
All societies have hierarchies of responsibilities. Kings were supported by the people and many were deposed.
The inquisition didn't even execute many people compared to the French Revolution or any other leftist revolution.
The Church never wrote or enforced laws, nations's mostly operated their own legal system and means of enforcement.
Implying expansionist Islamic Caliphate wasn't a reason.

I never said people couldn't read, idiot. Clergy, nobility and wealthy could read and write. The average person generally could not.

It depends what period we're talking about. 'Historically' may not be precise. After the 1500s there is a general trend over time of increased literacy.
>ourworldindata.org/literacy
I don't know where the stats come from.

wow dude, I was agreeing with you.
I was saying they were lying.
Try to avoid using insults.