Anarchism thread, only anarchists allowed.

Let's discuss anarchist theory and practice!

Attached: 1444668344450-0.png (991x656, 756.95K)

Other urls found in this thread:

No thanks

What's some criticism of lifestylist anarchism besides bookchin?

Go back to your containment board.

Don't tell us what to do!!!!

I don't much experience w/ how individualists organize irl, maybe someone can inform me about individualist/egoist praxis? How would an egoist group's tactics differ compared to, say, an ancom one?

What a glorious self contradicting load of bs
They would throw smug memes at the police and argue with each other about who sucked Stirner's dick the hardest while their protest gets shut down. Superior 5D chess basically.

I guess you don't go out much. There's a big difference in praxis between internet stirnerspergs and IRL individualists. The latter don't care much for philosophy (or strategy) are always itching for action. Not saying that's a good thing btw.

Go to bed you pissy child.

They would be affinity groups; personal relationships based in a high degree of mutual trust and cooperation. Anti-programmatic, as in a refusal to build organizations as such, see the platformist organization as an example of where they won't go.
Between egoists and insurrectionary anarchism (which is a branch of anarcho-communism) there is some strong overlap and has been since the first insurrectionary wave of Italian anarchists in the late 19th to early 20th century. For today see Bonanno and Landstreicher.
Praxis seems to consist of high level of security culture that acts as protection for their main tactics of expropriation of property and goods and attacks upon capital.

Do you have an historical example of it? Or any other historical example of egoists praxis?

Not >77819,
but The Bonnot Gang, Italian insus like Novatore, Sante Casario, Belgrado Pedrini, modern day insus like the CCF.
Lots of heroism and lots of fail.

Top kek

Wew. Being ready for action and actually organizing in a group with a coherent ideology and set of goals is said more easily than it is done. And since the only individualist anarchists™ are basement dwellers busy shitting on the rest of the left I doubt some violent egoists would accomplish anything more than a bunch of hooligans.

if YOU think it is normal, necessary and natural to slaughter and eat another sentient being because YOU beLIEve your TASTE is more important than LIFE then you are kNOT anarchy. Stupid, anti-live, suicidal, destructive adrenochrome and flesh addicts.

VERILY addicted - you are known and tracked by every meaty mouthful.

Comprehend pedovore?

It's by default higher level than any other revolutionary socialist tendency due to not forming identifiable organizations. There's no clear point of attack for capital as resistance can be leaderless, by lone wolf attacks or by word-of-mouth affinity networks. The the practice of the security culture I was mentioning go through lengths such as not using comms for example. Meanwhile platformists or ML orgs with geolocated places of operation are more than likely defanged the moment the national security agency gets word of them, as they triangulated, analyzed, infiltrated and subsequently neutralized. It's frankly embarrassing to see close to every "revolutionary socialist" tendency in my vicinity organize via Facebook. This is not the case with insurrectionary anarchists and that is a hell of a theoretical and practical achievement.

I think you're confusing me for an advocate. I'm not, but fact is there are a lot of self described egoists/individualists that are motivated activists, in only for their "own desires" or whatever. Sometimes they do things that align with the interests of our class (or at least against our class enemies) but they don't believe in long term strategy or personal accountability.

D45 is an anarchist at Heart. Ask his Barron - or ANY sentient being.

Yes. That may be. But I doubt those activists are actually fighting for the anarchist cause.

This just gives the pigs and excuse to cast a wider net and repress loads of people that are not involved. It would be a better strategy if they refrained from writing communiques.
Agreed. Poor stupid fucks.
Lol there's loads of insus that have shitty opsec

Quite a few think they do, and they are not all against joining/supporting libcom orgs. Remember: Egoism, like autism, is a spectrum.

So illegalism basically?

bollocks. "Spectrum" depicts and insinuates Hegelian opo-same merde. Just like we all know pornography when we see it; we ALL KNOW HARM WHEN WE FEEL IT.

you are not an anarchist if you choose to slaughter for taste alone.

Stupid parasitic solipsists.

Someone rangeban this retard.

try it fucktard and you'll ware every TRUE aNaRCHIST' roth

wanna DANCE fucker?

Take your meds

pathetic bitch. bend over

Eat shit.

common sense

Go on…

Attached: sweating.gif (400x225, 1.99M)

you sangs don't like mirrors, do you. One little word exposes your insanity:


and you're Triggered

Real anarchists leave the animals and children alone. Better, REAL ANARCHISTS protect Live…

Q Anarchy: No external rulers under the LAW of know no harm with Deadly Defensive Force

Why would you devote your life to something that by definition cannot last longer than 2-3 years

It's a pejorative that Bookchin made up so there isn't any other. Read a book.

Which one? I specifically wanted texts other than Bookchin because his later writings aren't very good and there does appear to be a split between "social anarchists" and "lifestylist anarchists" similar to the split between organizational anarchists and anti-organizational anarchists. If you've got a relevant recommendation I'll gladly add it to my to do list but otherwise I'm in the middle of a couple of books (Eclipse and Reemergence of the Communist Movement and Lenin as Philosopher) and don't see how reading those helps answer my question.

There's no actual split. Maybe Bookchin wanted one, but it never happened.


heterogeneous groups adopt common pattern (recognition)

F60, 300, 1500

Who would be so insane to deny mathematics?


Attached: CLulFmCVAAAVBh8.jpg (600x748, 47.6K)

Attached: 5e3cb3abd4bed32ec6ea5a44d6ed4385e7deb386.jpg (400x397, 96.81K)

mau mau

Attached: MarkPassio-Force Violence.jpg (496x349 134.42 KB, 182.7K)

You can check out I'll drop some basics that everyone on this board should read, if only to cut down on the retarded arguments.

Attached: petr-kropotkin-the-conquest-of-bread.pdf (Basic_Bakunin.pdf)

If an anarchist commune reaches a point where people in it want to start businesses and have to be prevented from doing it then the commune is already failing, a business implies a certain level of inequality already exists so that one can make profits of another person. In a well functioning commune the idea of making a business makes no sense.

please go away with your kakistocracy nonsense. Anarchists protect life with deadly defensive force. Meat, money and military NOT REQUIRED.

Welcome to earth - where LEO consumes pedovore

Anarchists are the ancaps of the left. Useless, 19 years old, XS clothes, haven't eaten protein ever, shows up at a proud boys rally in all black after finishing their Overwatch match to get their heads smashed in by 31 year old reddit "alpha males" and 54 year old harley davidson pepe worshipping white supremacists.

This all happens while communists and socislists armchair at home on 8ch and /r/latestagecapitalism.

Attached: 1521827597375.jpg (602x1024, 38.98K)

Wait, does that mean anarchists are gnostics?

Attached: Demi the Archon.png (666x868 54.79 KB, 134.44K)


Attached: x order.jpg (1856x887, 209.24K)


Attached: libsocrantssmuggie.png (500x372, 82.76K)

You have to go back.

Attached: tankiepraxis.png (1051x171, 88.72K)

Q Calibration : define gnostic please.

recall; John Lamb Lash misses the essence of the Essene - Turton 'n all

nah - too. Hegelian opo-same; KAKISTOCRACY - rule by (worst) solipsistic pedovore parasite.

Janeway vs Archon - Star Trek Voyager

Her Boss Phrase is catchy; "Go back to HELL coward"

"only anarchist allowed"
I see. OP is a genius. That is a bait to make ideologues behave like Anarchists ultimately not giving a fuck about imposed spokos.

imposed spokos. SPOKOS. Genius.

Attached: All according to plan.gif (800x800, 53.63K)

don't tell me what to do spook!
This just blew the fuck out of my respect for Bookchin.

Notice the imagery you use to represent anarchism. Destruction and nihilism. Nothing about cooperation. Nothing about building a more equitable and free world. Just some angsty faggot who lit some fellow worker's car on fire in a petulant, political tantrum. This is why anarchism is a fucking joke. All you want to do is burn shit down and destroy everything, and you revel in destructive, spoopy imagery. You're just promoting a different form of militarism, the same type of violent propaganda you criticize states for producing and pushing.

Who will enforce this rule lmao

>>>/liberalpol/ / Read any socialist revolutionary literature etc.
also the image of the OP only portrays insurrectionary anarchism. Platformists explicitly reject the tactic of propaganda of the deed / riots / inciting insurrections for socal change, instead promulgating a strategy for organizing the working class and thus gaining counter-power to be able to carry out a revolution, not merely riots.

we gonna make total destroy whether you like it or not

Attached: zapatista.jpg (1920x1080, 441.58K)

Attached: DeRev5SUQAA19iv.jpeg (1024x683, 138.33K)

Someone please engage with this

know quint?


welcome to the arena - it's Harbest Time ; fire at Prime Time.