Wow, it seems finally the FOSS world will have a game development suite, it seems is the final year of games in linux.
I mean, a single argentinian autists literally BTFO a multibillion company with hundreds of employees.
How?
Is this the power of autism?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
linuxfoundation.org
twitter.com
I'm not qualified to have a confident opinion but this makes it sound like they're just doing it wrong in Unity, by using a feature that can perform the task but isn't designed to.
...
Godot has a huge community behind. It was collective work, and has been around for a while.
Proprietary has some things going for it. Just look at photoshop vs gimp.
If proprietary software is better than free software at doing something then I want to know that. I'm not going to deceive myself for the sake of tribal signaling.
I almost exclusively use free software. I don't pretend it's better in every way. I'd have to do that if I didn't have a good reason for using it.
Hello BSD cuck. You are trying to conflate proprietary with a lot of development effort put into a piece of software. this is obviously bullshit, most proprietary software are cheap hackjobs that consist mostly of free software. The most expensive softwares like the kernel, compilers, and browsers are free and eclipsed proprietary products like opera. windows, ms compiler etc.
This. Proprietary software should be rejected on the grounds of it being proprietary, if someone chooses the free option because they find it technically superior it says nothing about whether they value freedom.
You made the same thread on /v/. It sucked there too. Reconsider your choices.
All modern software sucks, including Linux and BSD. I'd rather use proprietary software on Amiga than any of this lame ass shit.
True, but most good software is proprietary. The opensource code that happens to be good is developed by the same corporations that make all the proprietary code.
Lol nice try
Nice try gommie. That shits only given away by corporations so that they can sell ads to you in the case of google. In the case of firefox they make all their money shilling search engines and installing shitware in your browser.
>>>Zig Forums
Which part specifically do you think said that. Are you lacking in comprehension ability?
no u
>That shits only given away by corporations so that they can sell ads to you in the case of google.
And which part of that means gratis to you? LOL.
Is /leftlypol/ really so daft as to not understand that "give away" means make opensource here
Are they selling ads (LOL.) to you when you download the blink or aosp source? No???? What about the nonfree youtube?
I see following one level of logic is too complicated for you
ICC is still the best if you're targeting Intel (with some exceptions). Opera only stopped being the best because they sold out, Mozilla is doing their best to kill Firefox.
I won't shit on the work it's good but...
How much do you bet that once EEE companies will gain interest in it it will be used like a trojan horse ?
I think when you mean good you mean "it just works".
You seriously under estimate how much proprietary software is used in the real world. Just because you don't see a free download link for something does not mean it does not exist.
Unity looks like it has a Physically-based render, which looks nicer and 'softer'.
However Unity also looks washed out and the reflections are of course not there (ball and top row of sand cubes).
Oh no I don't underestimate it I know that it's used a fuck tons, I know that servers even tho gnu/linux dominates them have blobs and other shit software installed on them, 99.9% of all routers and hardware is like that, I know that in normie world it's only that, I know that cars are like that, I even fucking know that modern ICBMs have some.
I know that we live in a world where people use what they are told to use what they are told to learn with and people who tell/teach these people are incompetent in computer science and should be shot at sight because they created this apocalyptic bubble that is just asking to expand and eventually explode.
Welp enjoy your shitware while I use my proprietary code that actually works.
Gee, it's almost as if software quality depends on the amount of resources thrown at it rather than its licensing style!
Stallman will have an orgasm
Because NOT Open Sourcing is the MS Jew, the Intel Jew, the Jewgle
>>>/oven/
Yes go use (((linux))) where the biggest contributors are microsoft and intel where microsoft literally bought a board seat on the foundation. YOU THINK YOU GOT AWAY FROM THEM? LOL
i don't know anything about 3D rendering, but from every other aspect Unity is trash.
most proprietary code indeed does not work. normalfags (consumers) dont demand stuff that works, just stuff that is valuable in some sense
Biggest advantage that proprietary software has over free software is marketing.
Too many FLOSS devs have unrealistic expectation that people would use some software just because it is superior in technical sense. Meanwhile proprietary software people invest into tutorials and shit that teaches people how to use their software.
By the time that people find out about FLOSS they are already used to proprietary counterpart and find FLOSS unintuitive unless FLOSS copies proprietary software design. If FLOSS creates copy of proprietary software design then there is no need to switch to it because you do not gain anything by switching.
tl;dr: FLOSS people need better marketing.
Thats great and all but ive seen unity porn games and no godot porn yet. Call me when CoA or some other h makes the switch.
Thats great and all but ive seen unity porn games and no godot porn yet. Call me when CoA or some other h makes the switch. Id love to see the potential of this engine
porn requires licensing of actors/actresses
those guys love money, so it will never happen until now
Every time I re-try godot I see they've changed everything, I get confused and frustrated, and then I give up.
Unity still looks better.
gas all tripfags
>>>/auschwitz/
...unless it's 2d
Getting alot of feedback and getting everyone finding bugs and correct it for you. Because of contact, I can confirm you that the code of godot is much more cleaner than unity 3D. Like most of the people pointed out, it had alot of contributors. around 600~ on git. As much as I can recall, Juan made 1/10th of the commits. I've seen people modifying the source code of godot in order to optimize their game in my city. These are the kind of thing that cucks out unity from the market.
Is there like a Linux board of directors or something or are you talking about Ubuntu?
Looking into Godot...
It's just-slightly-off-mark language might be the million dollar mistake in 20 years. I fear it will be seen like the DirectX of its time.
"When doing things the right way takes two years and doing things the wrong takes two minutes, it's going to get down the wrong way." ~ Curtis Yarvin
Yes, its called the Linux Foundation. They are the ones that Linus is employed by.
>linuxfoundation.org
>The Linux Foundation provides Linux creator Linus Torvalds and lead maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman a neutral home where Linux kernel development can be protected and accelerated.
While I admit that Linus being on the payroll does make your point, at least in part, there is no Linux board of directors and if any of the people under the Linux Foundation wanted to they could cut ties tomorrow.
No there is just an organization that Linus works for that pays everyone and decides the future of the project that comprised of dozens of corporate interests. This is no way could be consider FOR LINUX though. Sure thing.
Really Linux does not have anyone in charge. Any user could just fork the kernel tomorrow. Linus has nothing to do with it! There is no Linux control structure.