Everyone should know by now that Google removed the View Image feature from their image search. However, a browser extension called View Image by a guy named Joshua B soon appeared and has worked great... up until now. Looks like Google are doubling down on their stance on the removal of the original feature and have patched their code to prevent the extension from working.
yeah I actually switched to bing when google did this
but I needed to google something so I typed google into bing, and then it had some weird message about I didn't need to go there because bing is better. So I am back to google now.
Wyatt Robinson
This behavior is not consistent as the image is usually a preview image, not the original, so opening in a new tab just opens the lower-res preview.
I did, too. However, as soon as I realized how much Bing sucks in comparison to Google, I searched for a means to bring the View Image button back to Google which is what led me to the extension.
Michael Cox
You'd better be fucking joking.
Nolan Nguyen
Not me. While Google is 200% pozzed, you can't deny that their engine is far superior to anything else. I've tried Bing, DuckDuckGo, etc, but they don't provide results that match my queryies anywhere near as well as Google. I go with the service that gives me what I need as a consumer.
John James
Use another search engine. It's literally in the sticky.
That is 100 percent WRONG. I get the full-res shit by using the right-click menu. Maybe it only works for Chrome
Parker Johnson
You have to wait for the image to be fully loaded, otherwise it just shows you Google's thumbnail. At least that's how it's been for me.
Anthony Cook
Searx is great. Anyone can host their own instance, and it works without CSS/javascript - so I can still use it with Lynx/w3m.
Tyler Morales
This is also true of DuckDuckGo Lite, although I use Surfraw and helm-firefox, so I just use the search engine I need most for the occasion, although I prefer DuckDuckGo. Not to flex in a pathetically nerdy way.
For the record, you can use Surfraw with basically any browser, including w3m. It works very nicely with runner like dmenu or, of course, EXWM's runner in GNU Emacs.
You can use w3m in Emacs, so you could also theoretically leverage helm-surfraw to interact with w3m.el. But I prefer eww.el over w3m--less dependencies, not to mention smaller; more minimal than w3m in that sense.
There's your answer. Because some images may be copyrighted, they decided to inhibit free downloading of images (at least without having to visit the originating website, which fact in turn effectively obliges the user to be bound by that site's "terms and conditions").
Lucas Johnson
hello, cuckchan! If you want to use the botnet, at least have some decency and stick to original, otherwise use unpopular proxies/searx instances chiru.no/a/search/
Literally goyim placebo tier.
Colton Davis
Jesus fucking christ you're a dumb nigger. Use searx you stupid faggot. Kill yourself
Jayden Butler
literally kill yourself
Angel Mitchell
Don't be jewish Well searx image search still works and gets results from the G so...