Why are the religious here not banned for adhering to an anti-materialist worldview and desperately clinging, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, to their delusional misinterpretations of the world? The propagation of falsities and reactionary viewpoints and practices is all tolerated under the guise of "freedom of religion", something which could perhaps be better known as "freedom to be ignorant and reactionary". Daily reminder that religion will be eradicated in its entirety, your churches, mosques and synagogues demolished and your "holy books" tinder for the triumph of scientific socialism. Once past views have been proven false, we do not accommodate them in the name of tolerance, we fight them with all of our power. We do not take seriously views that the Earth is flat or the Sun is the center of the solar system. Neither shall the delusions of the past be tolerated by law or state.
Religion Hate Thread
Other urls found in this thread:
Post more Soviet anti religion propa
>ban things that I know are a fracture point I dislike my fellow leftists
He's right you know?
What good will maintaining religion in the future do for our society? What positive effect does it have now? None. Is combatting obvious falsehoods creating a “fracture point”? I do not think so
Nice buzzwords and greentext argument
It's pretty literal, though. Mass purges for useless reasons are, well, sabotage and useless dumbfuckery.
Someone hasn't studied the history of revolutionary struggles in South America.
Please disregard shitposting flag
God damn it I need to proofread
No one has implied that “mass purges” would be needed to combat religion. Real life isn’t an edgy fantasy.
gay social democrats=revolutionary
I like the one eyed jew in first pic
I mean, it's literally positing interrogating folks about their personal belief so as to purge them.
That's kind of the objection.
In real life there would be no need to “purge” the religious (I assume when you say “purge” you mean kill). Whether someone holds it as a personal belief or not is irrelevant, it is a false belief and should be combatted through media, education, propaganda, restrictions and most fundamentally through the power of facts.
See, that's a far cry from the interrogation-and-ban called for in the original post - ironically a literal witchhunt.
You're more than invited to roleplay "edgy aetheist."
RISE MY FEDORAS RISE
TODAY WE WILL MAKE THEM REMEMBER !
My fedora was already pre-tipped before I created this thread
You legit sound like a fascist. "Nothing outside the state" is on of your fav quotes I'm guessing?
A state will exist in the lower phase of communism and so will law.
Nvr mind baby, I read your block of text wrong.
t. Ron Vibbentrop
imho a "moderate" stance on religion could be useful. I mean, I hate religion and it should die as it promotes anti materialism, class collaborationism, tradition, reactionary thought and is also anti class consciousness. I am no moderate against catholic religion and similar stuff that establishes real hierarchies of mystics, unironically thepope should be slaughtered and the vatican state put to an end. But protestant christianity and moderate islam should be not banned or such things.
First of all I think its important to consider just how much religion is dying. The thing here is that secularism has destroyed it by placing in an individual its civic duties as the primary moral element; one can easily see it in how the french clergy literally cried when forced to swear on the state, the very act of accepting these values as what the individual has to bow to first and foremost is a kind of acceptance that you are not adhering to his metaphysical scheme of god. That's why imho the romans did the thing of making the subected people accept their god as the most powerful and nothing else: it basically meant that you surrendered your entire worldview.
Second I think that it would be harmful to take an all guns blazing against all types of religion since so many people are firmly attached to them. After all, I think it would be easy to mold "moderate" (i.e. most submitted to secularism) religious views into socialist-friendly shit, as for example christian communism is already real and imho pretty on point on some stuff (altought cathbols should just kys, they just want theocracy with red carachteristics) and I think it would not be that hard to "reform" other religions too, but I am ignorant of a lot of stuff and so I don't have a view for how this could be done.
We should kill all Nazis!
Because Nazism is reactionary and incompatible with socialist ideals!
We should kill all Christians!
Because Christianity is reactionary and incompatible with socialist ideals!
Did you forget the parts where you are literally commanded to uphold private property?
As in, personal possessions and belongings? personal swords, tools, houses, oxen used for sustenance farming?
What religion are you talking about?
Here's a crazy idea; what if peoples' views on specific religions change as the times do? Many religions were founded before the advent of Capitalism, yet they still persist because they adapted to new economic modes of production. Even if a religion commands a person not to uphold private property, you'd still complain because a follower of that religion said private property is okay, because he is a sheep who has been led to blindly believe that Capitalism is okay, despite his religion stating otherwise. Ignorance, my friend, has consumed you.
Blanquism is unironically the way to go
Jesus literally told a parable commanding people to invest their income. Stay mad.
Holy shit that flag checks out 100%
Are you one of those "stock options are socialism" retards?
I make money anyways because i work for wages.
I want food, water, shelter, or more money because i live in a capitalist mode of production.
Not enough stuff is being produced because there just aren't factories.
I have the option to throw my useless money, coins, paper fiat, whatever, at a system so a factory gets built and my children have food and jobs. Guess what i'm going to do? i'm going to prioritize production over my own money. It's only fair that i get something out of it. This doesn't mean i care about money, it means i care about having my needs being met via production. Get a grip.
You're unironically ghey
NOT AN ARGUMENT
Cuba untill 1991 had State atheism.
His failure to purge Religion helped Priests organize reactionaries around Pinochet
A litteral gay socdem
The best way to get rid of religion is Divide an Conquer. Pit Christians against Muslims. Catholics against Protestants. Shias against Sunnies. All they while closing Religious schools and ensuring School Books have scientific teachings. This will alienate the youth against religion and make religious boomers unable to counter this because there fighting each other. Religion is why Socialism in Afghanistan failed. This Can’t happen again.
state secularism not state atheism ok?
If the religious manage to do enough loops in their head to justify political materialism and science while not eliminating their god then more power to them. We have few enough allies as it is.
They have been fighting one another for centuries. That does nothing but make them all more fanatical.
Why is secularism superior to state atheism? Like was said in the OP, if something is false why should the state take a neutral position on it? Education likewise should be atheistic, not accommodating of reaction. I am however opposed to doing something foolish like outright "abolishing" religion Pol Pot-style.
How do we stop religious people from breeding like rats?
Supper religious people breed slightly above replacement level. The problem is that leftist oftentimes die childless. We need comrades to bread more.
Groups like the Old Order Amish have fertility rate at >6 children per woman. That's a lot higher than "slightly above replacement level". There are expected to be 7 million Amish by the end of the century, despite there only being 300,000 Amish now.
Because expending man hours and resources to correct the minds of people who believe in dumb shit is nothing but a waste and prone to becoming a problem itself.
Castro was catholic. He may have not practiced it but he still believed in God.
According to your graph “Extremely Conservative” only bread at 2.1
Wtf I’m converting to Amish now. But seriously the Amish unlike other religious nutjobs don’t spread there shit everywhere. In my book there better than Evangelicals, Baptists, and even Catholics. The Amish who do jack shit it terms of affecting other people aren’t the problem. The problem is people spreading religion in order to combat leftist, enlightenment movements, and spread reactionaries around. Also the solution is to outbreed the Amish, we’re never going to get them to stop breading.
Source? God I hope not, there are already tons of of them in my state (Ohio) and their horses shit on the roads and slow down traffic. A few million more would be crazy. It’s always weird driving around in the country on a Sunday and seeing pic related walking along the road
In the articles I linked previously
My god, that would be nearly 0.07% of the population!
Its not feasible to kill all Nazis or to kill all Christians, its not really a matter of what anybody wants.
I dunno why aren't atheists shot in the back of the head?
if we started banning idealists for idealism there would be barely anyone left posting. anyway - aggressively anti-religious policy will only entrench it as a force opposing socialism or a socialist state. better to as materialists do and change the material conditions that give rise to religious organisation and beliefs.
campaigns against reactionary religious institutions is another matter, though in some systems of religion the very institution rather than god or belief is the centrepiece, like in catholicism for example.
Why aren’t the religious put in forced re-education camps? Antitheism Archipelago when?
t. CIA nigger
Religion is the ultimate spook. Trying to be both leftist and religious is such a contradiction.
For now you are roaming free.
Enjoy your time while it last.
posting in a falseflag thread
based Orthodox Juche engaged.
"comrades to bread"
Why are the secular here not banned for adhering to an materialist worldview and desperately clinging, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, to their delusional misinterpretations of the world? The propagation of falsities and reactionary viewpoints and practices is all tolerated under the guise of "freedom from religion", something which could perhaps be better known as "freedom to be ignorant and reactionary". Daily reminder that religion will be eradicated in its entirety, your vampire administration class colleges, debt factories and sjw havens demolished and your "text books" tinder for the triumph of scientific socialism. Once past views have been proven false, we do not accommodate them in the name of tolerance, we fight them with all of our power. We do not take seriously views that the Earth is flat or the Sun is the center of the solar system. Neither shall the delusions of the past be tolerated by law or state.