I have a theory Kanye litterally bribes Pitchfork for the high reviews

i feel your pain. that guy is a tard ass.

thank you user. some of these people are excruciatingly stupid

Motherfucking DIE you subhuman piece of shit

Attached: LWJD8_s-200x150.gif (200x150, 303.74K)

Hes got one. Chill.

I meant the part of buying ratings you insufferable idiot.

Ah I see you're that autist who moved goalposts in that vinyl thread.

wow youre getting good use out of these wookie.gifs arent you

Attached: science.gif (480x480, 76.3K)

You've not given any evidence of "rating-buying" in the case of Pitchfork.

you had and have no argument about vinyl btw. you are a fat autist who listens to music on your phone. people buy records and listen to music on stereos because they care about audio quality which is something you don't understand because you listen to music for the sake of telling other people how much music you've listened to. no one cares. it isn't a substitute for having a personality.

you're right user. they're probably the one totally scrupulous corporation out there. their ratings are exclusively based on what their writers (totally unmotivated by any external factors) think is good. i hope santa is good to you for cwithmath

>reading comprehension
The original argument wasn't about "quality" but rather ownership you fucking ESL. That user proceeds to claim that you don't own digital even though that's a format, not distribution and you can easily OWN digital through piracy if you aren't a room temperature IQ boomer who can't function on the internet. Hell it's even possible to purchase digital through online stores if taking the interview is really that difficult.
I swear the idiots who post on this site.

>le everything is a conspiracy
Trump lost chud, don't get too angry I promise things will be better in the future :)

sorry autist i don't remember the minutae of the argument that you were having with a completely different poster and have for some reason started having again with me (probably a flare up of your obviously quite severe autism). if you're fine with "owning" your little ones and zeroes in a completely non physical format have your little fun or whatever, i guess?

Attached: giphy (2).gif (245x233, 1.12M)

oh, okay. thanks for clearing up the results of an election i didn't vote in or give a shit about either way. that has absolutely nothing to do with corporate overreach (which btw shouldn't anti-corporate stances be a left wing pov? why would you assume someone who is anti-corporate overreach is right wing?)

>because you don't own the things in your hard drive like your photos or work related files
>calling other "autist" when he proceeds to engage in this "argument" even though he admits he wasn't the original poster
Oof talk about a train wreck.

>consistent 10's
he got a single 10 and it was a decade ago
now that kanye is based and redpilled they will never give him even another BNM ever again, let alone a 10

Attached: 1592325680286.jpg (1080x1070, 139.6K)

are you legit retarded? i feel a little bad desu. you keep fucking responding to my posts and then you're surprised when i answer back (telling you that i'm not the person you think i am)... like yeah... "you got me" i'm responding to you because you keep talking to me. ha ha! good one user!

Attached: leo.gif (500x223, 498.53K)

see
>also he thinks bogus conspiracies isn't inherently a right-wing belief
Left-wing pov are fond of evidence(s), which you've not provide.

>"anecdotal"
>verifiable corporate owned publication

Attached: f9FW2.gif (240x180, 2M)

>claims that you can purchase ratings on Pitchfork
>asks for evidence
>"they're a corporate owned publication therefore it's true"

Attached: 1556508677431.png (546x565, 53.43K)

i didn't claim that "you" can "purchase" ratings on pitchfork. I said because they are a publication owned by a massive multi-billion dollar corporation that it goes without saying that they take money in exchange for good reviews. are you just not familiar with the long established concept of payola in the music industry? are you just completely fucking retarded or are you trolling or what?

>i didn't claim that "you" can "purchase" ratings on pitchfork
>I said because they are a publication owned by a massive multi-billion dollar corporation that it goes without saying that they take money in exchange for good reviews.
Literally the fucking same thing idiot.
>are you just not familiar with the long established concept of payola in the music industry?
You made that extraordinary claim so fucking back it up.

Attached: 1448073604412.gif (250x250, 1.26M)

holy shit... you are just like world endingly life fuckingly dumb. you... think that an individual... offering a publication money for a good review is the same as... a multi billion dollar corporation accepting favors from another... that's... jesus. you know what user, all of the reviews you read in your favorite mags are totally on the up and up. everything is fine. your "Certified Fresh" movies are all legit and your favorite video game sites aren't incentivized to give good reviews to AAA games either. everything is fine.

Attached: 200106-bixby-pete-cia-tease_esx5hs.jpg (1200x675, 136.5K)

user how old are you? please be honest