nytimes.com
SO MUCH FOR THE KRAKEN
HAHAHAHAHHHA
Dominion Voting orders Sidney Powell retract ‘baseless and false allegations’ or will sue
Adrian Flores
Other urls found in this thread:
Lucas Ross
So?
Henry Hernandez
then sue
Michael Peterson
>they sue
>sidney FINALLY gets to expose her evidence in court
>????
>profit
Sebastian Lopez
she is a lawyer, she knows what she is doing
wouldn't put herself in a position to get sued if she was wrong
Lincoln Jones
Great, now they can demonstrate their evidence and enter discovery.
Tyler Bell
>knows what she is doing
Have you seen any of her litigation? Her incompetence is STAGGERING.
Chase Campbell
They won’t.
> what is discovery
Luis Walker
This. There’s a desperation here that’s pretty stunning. Expect shills to be going “she was literally sued for slander!!” Even as the case is going before scotus
Robert Fisher
See and Discovery will be fun
Hunter James
explain then if you think so
Eli Gutierrez
What specifically has been incompetent? Only rulings against her have been with respect to standing. Courts have refused to allow her a venue because they're afraid of what she has and allowing for full discovery.
Carson Reed
they sue and they get exposed
WIN WIN SITUATION
RELEASE DA KRAKEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mason Johnson
kek, fucking retards can't sue because that would expose them, this basically proves her correct
Samuel Perez
>don't retract anything at all
>never get sued
dogs that bark a lot, speaking of a lot. did you already hear the news?
Nicholas Wright
Shill harder. You will never be a real woman. Discovery would be great.
Tyler Reed
Do it faggots. The discovery portion of the trial would be epic.
Nathaniel Smith
she'll get about as much sued as based rudy will get sued over this:
youtube.com
what a legend
Luke Martinez
That's a one way ticket to the supreme court. Do they really want any evidence to be show? No way in hell. Scare tactic only works if you are 100% bullet proof, this is not the case.
Jackson White
It takes a single second to wipe memory. You retards who don't understand computers are in for a world of pain.
If you people think these machines - which are all hooked up online - haven't been patched already. You're a bunch of delusional retards.
Caleb Cooper
sure, ignore the cropped documents, spelling mistakes, and errors in the legal briefings. not like making sure that shit doesn’t happen isn’t the whole point of her job.
John Ramirez
>suits allege fraud but not fraud to try to get around strict requirements of proof
>suits that don’t allege fraud allege improper voting rules a la the texas suit, then get rekt by doctrine of laches by not having submitted these complaints before the election
>no case files submitted with any proof which is required if you seek immediate injunctions (overturned elections / thrown out votes)
>injunctions of that extreme demanded even in cases where fraud isnt alleged (!!!?!?!)
Just... read the court opinions in her submitted cases, every time its the judicial equivalent of “the fuck is this?”
Charles Lee
Doesn’t this mean they have to prove they didn’t commit fraud then? They really didn’t think this through.
Kevin Reed
>a civil court matter going to the supreme court
Nigger that isn’t how this works.
Anthony Hernandez
No. It doesn't. Even if it did, its about time you tards got it through your head that there was no fraud, so I welcome this reaching discovery.
William Torres
>"omg if they sue her it'll prove everything!!"
Brody Carter
LOL, you think data actually gets deleted?
Henry Bell
The onus is on her to prove that you mouth breathing moron.
Aaron Ward
More like they entertained your delusion enough so now they are going to expose Powell.
Maybe that way you fucks will cope with the loss.
Lol.
Daniel Lee
why are canadians this stupid, why? what went wrong with this shithole country?
Carter Lopez
She’s got evidence. My point was I don’t think they want this to go to court. Also leaf go home
Dylan King
I mean, that was the idea all along, wasn't it? Far easier to win a civil court case and make some shekels along the way. It was difficult for her to sue Dominion herself right away, and it would not have created this media attention
Ryder Garcia
>Want to sue which means go to court.
>Dont think they want to go to court.
Holy shit you magapedes are beyond help.
Kevin Ward
There have been several factual errors in her allegations that are bad enough to be severely embarrassing, like claiming discrepancies in counties that literally don't exist in the state she's filing suit over.
Michael Clark
No, she doesnt have evidence. If she did, she’d have won one of these dozens of shitty suits by now.
Go verify this shit for yourself. Im not spoonfeeding you. Its all public record and a google search away. Can read all her suits and all the rejecting opinions.
Caleb Sanchez
They're fucking chink imposters.