What did they mean by this?
What did they mean by this?
harley wants to separate herself from joker's gamer army
if she kills a normie everyone will believe shes still a #gamer
How did Joker know the identity of Robin but not Batman?
>normie
>not normalfag
Um, we don't use that word anymore it's offensive
you can't kill what has no life.
They can kill guards, police, goons and their specific targets, like polluters for Ivy. But not other random civilians.
Writers of this show are lurking, OP.
that the writers are bad, because literally neither of them care about killing normal people and have likely caused the death of thousands if not millions just in the shows timeline, but they need a reason to not kill the Joker right away.
so they become suddenly worried that they might be hurting an innocent person, giving them an excuse to wait to figure out if that's really the Joker and if he's hiding or actually brainwashed
also you would think Harley would know Joker well enough to know the only way he could hide himself as a normal person was if he got brainwashed, but its not like she was famous for her study into the Joker's mental conditions or anything or that they literally spent the whole episode on a flashback talking about how good of a doctor she was and her work with the Joker
Harley Quinn is not a show you should think too much about, true for most DC, but double true because its an edgy adult comedy with an equal amount of logical consistency as other works of the genre like R&M
"Normie" is such a non-word. It has evolved to basically be anything that is deemed "other" to the group using it.
>REEEEEEE if Harley doesn't kill innocents, the writing is bad
Such a cucked mentality.
She does kill innocents though, Ivy stating that they don't contradicts everything we already seen.
That they're are ripping off Venture bros because no way does this make sense coming from the DC universe.
>She does kill innocents though
Like whom?
Cops and security guards don't count.
>Cops and security guards don't count.
Why not?
Because pigs aren't innocent.
They're supervillains though.
>current year
>Harley and Ivy
>supervillains
What.
Get better material.
I mean. neither is she
But they're not supervillains.
In the show they are.
Of course not, but when did she argue she is innocent?
Look, under Harley's understanding of things, you can only kill people that are "in the game". She kills henchmen from other villains without a second thought, but she would rather give up a high-rewarding heist than killing innocents, unlike Queen of Fables.
For Harley, people on law enforcement are just henchmen of the law, and thus are in the game, and thus can be killed.
>you can only kill people that are "in the game".
This isn't venture bros, the villains aren't rich eccentric fighting other rich eccentrics.
Who said this is Venture Bros?
This is just Harley's moral. She is willing to kill law enforcement if they get in her way, she is not willing to kill "normies", that is, people that aren't law enforcement or goons of other villains.
What, exactly, can't you understand about this?
Is this a rule meant just for Harley and Ivy or for Supervillains in general?
>Who said this is Venture Bros?
Because what you're describing is Venture bros rules but DC villains aren't contained like that. Her schemes affects innocent lives, they endangers innocent people all the time.
>What, exactly, can't you understand about this
The fact that it doesn't make any sense with the logic of the show.
>Because what you're describing is Venture bros rules but DC villains aren't contained like that.
But those aren't general rules. Those are just Harley's morals. Again, what can't you understand?
Villains like Joker, Scarecrow and Queen of Fables would murder anyone, normie or not. It's not like there's a "guideline" that villains need to follow. Harley, specifically Harley, doesn't kill normies.
What logic is being broken?
>What logic is being broken?
Ivy's sentient plant already killed a family.
Is Harley Ivy's sentient plant?
>Those are just Harley's morals
Which don't make sense because she has killed innocent people.
She hasn't.
She didn't do anything about it.
What could she do? Revive the family?
Yeah she has, her actions constantly endangered civilians.
When did she kill normies? In which episode?
You're saying her actions haven't endangered civilians?
Her direct actions haven't killed any innocent.