New looney tunes animation

Why are people so upset?
youtube.com/watch?v=ZYW0SedKivw

Attached: 4525353535.png (588x536, 253.94K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/ToonCrate/status/1261321777017499648
twitter.com/CarolineDirectr/status/1261767421158780928
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Can you resume it? I’m not watching that shit

It's the definition of trying to be pretentious and shitting on something for being new while not understanding anything about animation or what's going on
This clip sums up the entire thing, they even admit it
twitter.com/ToonCrate/status/1261321777017499648

Attached: EAhBoa_XsAAUhF1.jpg (556x288, 17.19K)

>Greg Duffell
>A literal who

Attached: 1408929929030.jpg (900x900, 105.49K)

Sneed Jones (formerly Chuck Jones)

damn son

who gives a shit about him?

Yes.

He did all of 2 Jones shorts, Superior Jones (where daffy sounds like shit), and that sequel with the frog and marvin.

nobody knows him
he's not a celeb

It insists upon itself.

Is he just the only one who's alive then? Why'd they get him?

>"people"
youtubers aren't people.

I haven't watched the video on it, but what are people complaining about it? Is it just the usual nitpicking or just pointing out something retarded in the video?

Hi, Greg! You're not Chuck Jones. You worked under him, You're no one.

Asserting that digital animators can't draw at all and that the computer is filling in all the in-betweens were some prime boomer takes.

tl;dr
>Various scenes don't look well drawn out, Greg blames it on current technology such as digital drawing.
>Explains how he believes digital drawing allows for poor drawings and thus poor animation.
>States that several areas of the new Looney Tunes looks like it came out of a Student Project as several scenes makes have various amateur mistakes.
>Even goes as far as saying, in specific scenes it looks like the animators don't even know how to draw.

Harsh remarks, but funny enough he did have a point. Granted, he was being a bit blunt on it, but in the overall who cares.
Even at the end of the video, it's explained how it just isn't possible to animate like the old WB cartoons due to all the current technology advances.

based jack

Attached: 1563647616115.jpg (1080x1135, 506.94K)

Attached: 1503473906594.gif (300x225, 3.7M)

What was wrong with OK KO?

DA ANIMATION IS NOT PWETTY!!!!! IT HAS TO BE PWETTY DURRR!!1!!1!

Attached: 664.jpg (558x614, 17.57K)

he's right when he talked about the head not moving its just a copy and paste and cuting corners bs thats wrong.

OKKO was actually pretty neat in my opinion
but also kind of, boring, for an action cartoon atleast

>New technology is developed that makes animation easier and cheaper
>NUUUUUU You can't do that! It's not like the old stuff! You can't even draw!!!
What a shit take. Everyone in the comments section is dunking on the guy too.

Yes, and...?

>shit designs
>shit plots
>shit pandering
It's shit, KOfag. Thankfully it is cancelled and already forgotten by the general public.

>it just isn't possible to animate like the old WB cartoons due to all the current technology advances.
Have paper and pencils disappeared from the earth?

Attached: 68FCD739-61A9-4DD4-8FAB-A4CFAB2819A1.png (1752x6796, 3.63M)

twitter.com/CarolineDirectr/status/1261767421158780928
This whole thread seems to be the reaction

Attached: 456555213.jpg (570x570, 65.19K)

They seem salty, honestly