Batwoman

...Why?

Attached: 98696FA4-928A-4918-930A-1471651413EA.jpg (1242x1320, 1.05M)

If I had to call my shot, I would say Rose just rubbed people the wrong way. It's like she had a permament smirk etched into her face and an aura of self importance and entitlement. She could have been the most well written character in the world, but it doesn't matter if you want to punch the main character every time they are on screen.

I doubt execs would boot her because of her face.

It's not her face per say. At just a glance I think she actually looks good in the costume, it's how she carries herself. It's like she is perpetually smug with how she is carrying on the legacy and how she's making it "her own". Ruby the person is infecting the character to the point where I actively cheer every time someone puts her in her place (or attempts to). It's not the character that's the problem (although some better writing would help), it's what Ruby brings with to the role, it's toxic.

Seems no one cares.

When a show gets renewed for a third season, a massive cast pay jump happens due to standard SAG contracts. That's why so many shows last two seasons if they have lukewarm ratings but some critical acclaim, three seasons if they have a dedicated fanbase and critical acclaim but they are trying to bet on whether that audience jumps to main stream (see: Evil Dead), or as long it can go if the ratings are strong at any point.

My theory is Batwoman was doing okay enough to renew but not well enough to justify really courting Ruby Rose as a big star, so she just got the standard S3 cast paybump. Then Ruby Rose looked at it, went 'I think I'd rather try to get that sweet movie money again' and bowed out.

Lesbian rage

Back injury, full time schedule, fear of typecasting, constant online abuse from idiots who think "get woke go broke" is an actual thing

>online abuse from idiots who think "get woke go broke" is an actual thing
But it is a thing. Look at Ghostbusters. Look at the Ocean Movie. Going full "woke" it political version of going full retard. Not Leo in Gilbert Grape, but Speedman in simple jack.

but they hadn't even hit season 2 yet, much less three.

You do realize there is a casting process, right?

and nothing of value was lost

Honestly she might have realized she was too good for this CW shit. She was in John Wick 2 for god sake

She doesn't want to end up being a permanent staple at CW

So if Ghostbusters (2016) had the same script but with male leads it would have been a good movie? That's what you're arguing, right?

Wasn't she mute in that film?

Yeah but acting with facial expressions alone is worth commending, right?

It didn't have a better script because they were counting on grrl power to carry the movie.

I'm gonna rewatch the film before I say anything more.

Kek, fuck batdyke

Ruby Rose was putting me off watching it.

Should I watch it, anons?

Her back got all fucked up

It's already renewed for two more seasons.

>So if Ghostbusters (2016) had the same script but with male leads it would have been a good movie?

Making the 3rd ghostbusters movie a reboot was the dumbest possible idea that could be done to the franchise. And the only reason to even do that is if you don't want the the original team to get the credit for founding the business.

More like a lesbian ragequit.

So, I know they're saying it's not cancelled, but it's fucking cancelled, right?

>But it is a thing
Of course it is

Say have they canceled all the star trek shows and sold the IP to NBC yet?

No. They'll just recast.

Not that I care for the CW shows in general, but this would be the last one I'd ever watch. Who honestly gives a shit about Batwoman?

This sounds more like you're autistic.

Gay Twitter is having a fit right now. REAP THE SALT, BOYS!