You think Gyatso molested Aang?

the tattoos follow the chi paths in the body
are you suggesting that males have an extra 8th dick chakra? are you saying dick energy is real?

Yes

Attached: D6A5E5CD-42B6-497B-AE78-ABD10F9F50B4.png (655x1800, 294.14K)

The water chakra is located in the genitals.

Sexual energy is canon to the chi paths.

No, he always made sure Aang was lubed and ready.

Did Aang then go on to do the same to Tenzin?

Would you?

epic

What type of bender could utilize their abilities for sex the best?

I feel like airbenders would be a bunch of liberal scumbags who'd say shit like "Love is Love man"

Considering airbenders are the stand-in for buddhist monks, they're gender segregated and openly practiced homosexuality, he definitely did

Gyatso was on Epstein's list

What are the age of consent laws for the Air Nomads?

Does that matter? Zen monks used to fuck their pupils when they were just boys

utan tvekan grabbe

He is more like a father figure. I'd think the airbenders are so liberal they might let the youths experiment among each other and I wouldn't be surprised if the monks got some from time to time. But there was nothing in their relationship that suggest anything but appreciation for each other and a master-student relationship. I don't get why all friendships in this modern era have to be interpreted as sexual or romantic.

It’s realistic. A lot of monks fucked kids, like priests.

So who molested Zuko? Ozai or Iroh?

Ozai wouldn’t waste his time on Zuko

According to the Korra comics, yes. Everyone fucked everyone, and no one ever openly objected, because Air Nomads are free lovers. He probably wanted to say something, but everyone would just brush it off. Korra likes to appeal to THAT part of the alphabet community.

I go back and forth on the issue. On the one hand i am capable of feeling deep and platonic love that doesn't feel in any way sexual for people in my life. Some of them are wicked old dudes with nothing remotely sexual about them and others are chiseled fucking gods that I can appreciate the aesthetic beauty of but the thought of doing anything sexual with them just makes my penis die. It's weird because up until I think of something legitimately sexual I feel really 'into them'.

Then there are friends who I have the same feelings for as the platonic ones listed above, but somehow sex with them feels like a good thing, with literally no romance. I think its in our nature to have both, so I can understand why you wouldn't want every relationship sexualized as it insists that man is only ever allowed to 'get close' to a woman which is a horrible fucking way to live your life. On the other hand, just because its romantic doesn't mean it can't also be sexual. It's something that previous cultures understood but ours has forgotten. We unfortunately tie male on male sexuality to gay culture which attempts to either simulate straight relationships (which is dumb) or borderline transgenderism and no one wants that.