What's the point of disarming Elmer Fudd? Bugs bullying him is only funny when Elmer is trying to kill him

What's the point of disarming Elmer Fudd? Bugs bullying him is only funny when Elmer is trying to kill him

Attached: 29334858-8396895-image-a-47_1591556248733.jpg (634x465, 41.7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WhJlaC710oY
youtube.com/watch?v=phgPV5-9R3k
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Elmer kind of tried to kill him in different ways

Somebody that pays money to WB want it this way.

Elmer is still trying to kill him, dumbass. The weapon just changed.

why do we keep complaining about this? Can’t we just accept the fact that Looney Tunes will never be exactly the way it was during its golden years, and simply admire the animation and creativity that is on display in these new shorts?

Too bad that weapon sucks ass and will never be as hilarious as the gun.

Because the new content is a watered down shell of the original show, but to each their own I guess.

True, but he always still fell back on using the gun.

>Animation
>Creativity
None of those are there though.

>that weapon
If you mean "that one weapon" everyone is bitching about it was in one teaser short that aired a year ago and none of the actual ones
Actually watch the HBO Max shorts before commenting on this

we just gotta find a way to solve all the current issues surrounding guns and then they’ll be okay to use in cartoons again.

unfortunately that’ll probably take awhile

Wat

He's still trying to kill the wabbit but now he looks like a deranged maniac instead of a idiotic hunter. How can you bring back Fudd with no Fuddgun.

He doesnt need a gun to be funny

Attached: 7c1eebd0f67db4d78de4298d7700cec8--elmer-fudd-looney-tunes[1].jpg (236x164, 8.42K)

We did.

Anyone else noticed how this kind of autistically repetitive thread only happens to Nettflix and WB shows?

I think this disappointment might be coming from people who assumed based on the early announcements that these new shorts would feel just like old shorts, and then realized that that wasn’t quite what was happening.

This is going to save lives.

>that these new shorts would feel just like old shorts
But so far they are.
youtube.com/watch?v=WhJlaC710oY

I’ll be honest that’s pretty good

This could not air today

Attached: 530674_470328852990556_970466327_n.png (389x352, 228.08K)

No, Poketoons are put them to shame.
youtube.com/watch?v=phgPV5-9R3k

And "that weapon" you are all bitching about from the article was only used one in a teaser trailer a year ago that we knew about for a year

We took guns in cartoons for granted.

Attached: 1536203509315.jpg (1920x1080, 213.68K)

Nice

But this is much nicer, it's not shot like a episode of Family Guy.
youtube.com/watch?v=phgPV5-9R3k

>I can save Looney Tunes! I have IDEAS!

proclaimed user, blissfully unaware that the two live-action Looney Tunes movies are so-bad-it's-good garbage people love to watch ironically and Friz Freleng already tried everything else in the 1970s to no success, when the good cartoons were already 30 years old and more heavily dated than all the anons in any given thread on Zig Forums

This literally ripped off a 40s Mickey cartoon gag for gag and is pure shit

(You)

Just another sign of how pussified our society has become, pretty soon all cartoons like old school looney tunes will be extinct and we'll be stuck with "progressive" crap like Stephen Universe

Then:

>Be vewy vewy quiet. I'm hunting wabbits!

Now:

>Be vewy vewy caweful. I can't offend the libewals!

Attached: Upset.gif (360x202, 3.16M)

I thought Back in Action was a nice tribute to the old shorts.

Loony Tunes are fucking ancient. How gives a shit what the new cartoon is doing? It will just be shit, and then everyone will forget about it in a year. Who cares?

Do kids today even give a shit about bugs bunny or Mickey Mouse

Nope. They feel like bland watered-down imitations of the old shorts.

I wonder if they'll disarm Sam too

Attached: 61Mof9Bvo-L._AC_SX522_.jpg (522x508, 33.06K)

>imagine having to make fake controversy over your show because its just that shitty
kek, he didnt have one in the last 3 shitty looney tunes shows

No, the cartoon is excellent and the short only had a train in it in common, the Mickey short was about Mickey hiding Pluto while he was taking a trip while the Poketoon was about a Scraggy eating candies that led him into a train that had a Mimikyu in it.

The only thing they had in common was that they had a train in it, thats it.

They had the same gags

Why are there three threads about this? We've already known about this for weeks.

Attached: superman-shoot.jpg (219x244, 66.02K)

Mickey is a mascot
Bugs has countless memes, you think no one cares for him?

No one cares about either as a cartoon. You could replace Mickey with his silhouette and get the same result, and bugs memes would still be made without new content

My niece thinks that his name is "Big Chungas"

I think they’re giving him knives.

Nope, the Mickey one played out like a tamer Warner Bros cartoon when the Poketoon did it's own thing.