Hey Zig Forums

Hey Zig Forums

Same user from a few months ago who asked about the constant push for these type of ideas in children's media.

Last thread was good. Let's have another discussion on it.

Honestly this shits going and has already gone far enough

Attached: Screenshot_20200613-200306_Twitter.jpg (1080x2280, 1.04M)

Other urls found in this thread:

themediareport.com/fast-facts/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

MAYBE IF WE DELETE Zig Forums, NICKELODEON WILL STOP DOING STUPID BULLSHIT LIKE THIS!

I legitimately don't see the issue. Why do you want to hide from kids that gay people exist?

I don't like kids being taught about sodomy.
Sorry.

Attached: 1589863659934.jpg (1242x930, 223.47K)

I hope you're keeping them away from priests then.

I'm not a fan of gay priests either. Or organized religion in general.

We had a good 50 years where gays never needed to be seen in cartoons, and guess what? Gays didn't suddenly cease to exist because of that. They were still able to enjoy cartoons and other forms of entertainment.

Leave it to the sodomite to bash the concept of faith. The only thing you believe in is [product].

May as well, they're barely even 5% of the population

Not him but religion sucks

Spread this if you want to!

Attached: spongenotgay.png (645x700, 276.99K)

>never intended
>almost
Many old IPs weren't intended for a lot of things they're doing now. It's known that creators don't know everything about their creations and make it up as they go.

it cause the characters were coded gay, i feel like its just ego bullshit that now there a unified group that has some control they want it everywhere

This argument makes no sense. When a kids show has parents sleeping in the same bed do you have to explain straight sex to them? Why do you suddenly have to explain all the mechanics of sex between 2 people just because they're gay?

What unified group has control?

maybe there's a lack of sexuality because it's a FUCKING CHILDREN'S CARTOON FOR FUCK SAKES

>lack of sexuality
>shows the inside of a pregnant woman's womb
?????

They hide jews
Why hide gays if they’re such a low percentile too?

He should. Most priest sexual controversies are male priests on young boys. This isn't the zinger you think it is, and further proves user's point.

Yes.

Talking sponge fry cooks are 0% of the population.

Pregnancy and sexuality are two different things. It's not like the show described the process through which Mrs Squarepants got pregnant and it probably doesn't expect the kids watching to know.

She's pregnant therefore she has had sex. That's more sexual than having gay characters date each other.

>Why don't gay people have babies

>115653271
This user wants drag queens reading to his kids

Remove the last bit tho. His mom did't reproduce asexually but Spongebob did.

Attached: baeb4cad40a626c2b91136d6257032b9c27389302fc4df4540b2aa5cc778e8d9_1.jpg (1080x1223, 187.73K)

Whatever user made this image, I don’t get why they don’t want anyone even calling him asexual. Stephen used that word verbatim but because he said “almost” then we shouldn’t?

Yeah but one isn't placed in the show to promote and normalize unhealthy sexual behavior.

Attached: 1585709361978.jpg (540x402, 49.64K)

Zig Forums was a mistake -moot

I don't know, why is 90% of gay activism exposing children to homosexuality?

Priests are less likely to abuse than the general popularion. You're more likely to be abused by the tranny at the library than your parish priest.

Atheists and fags both hate religion because they are generally the same people.

Attached: gaytheism.jpg (1190x840, 316.19K)

I sure as hell would hide my children from gay "people".

Like I said...

Statistically kids are safer with priests than they are with their own parents. The media just plays up pedo priest stories to shame Catholics into compliance with globohomo
themediareport.com/fast-facts/

It's actually unhealthy so suppress part of natural human social behavior.

Suppressing natural behaviors is necessary for a functining society. Same reason I don't defecate and masturbate in public.

Ok, Boomer

Attached: EWh6J4WU0AcLqvn.jpg (423x612, 36.58K)

Oh I know. Female teachers are also statically way more of a danger then priests. I agree with you user. I was just calling out the person trying to go "HURR PRIESTS" when he doesn't seem aware that it shows just how predatory homosexuals are

People are prone to reject religion that hates them.
Meanwhile statistics tell there is many closetet people among the religious

Are you an inbred retard or do you seriously think that Jewish characters don't appear in kids' shows?

Attached: francine and family.png (500x274, 229.09K)

Yet there are no religious people hiding amongst the fags. Really shows which lifestyle is more rewarding

>hates
More like gays are so narcisistic that they think any criticism of thier lifestyle is a personal attack.
>many
Why did you chose the vaguest and most unhelpful word possible to make your case?

I agree, not needing to hide can be very rewarding.

How far are you willing to go with that? And who determines what is and isn't "natural human social behavior"?