Webcomic creators going back and adding content warnings/ outright censoring their old works

Concession

You guys should’ve seen Toonami General throwing a tantrum over the addition of warnings to that episode of Paranoia Agent about suicide despite them still airing it without censorship.

>most furfag webcomic artist/writers:
>I didn't know these jokes would one day be offensive to people who get offended by everything, please don't hate me!
>david hopkins
>Found some old patreon only comics that involve random people getting raped, gonna share them, enjoy.

>furshit

yep

Having warnings like that is okay. Censiring though is just cowardly. The guy who made six billion demons covering up a masochist nun when he was known in /aco/ for drawing slut shaming porn is fucking pathetic, and the type of shit only a ""male ally"" would do

>as teens

i find it really annoying being spoiled that a suicide is going to occur in the story. ideally content warnings should be at the start, but the actual list of things is hidden until you press a button.

Indeed, my man.

Ive seen people say this with comics like Dominic deegan even though mookie was in his 20s when he wrote it.

>it's THEIR work
No, it's the public's.

>adding warnings is fine.
Adding warnings is just the first step. We've already had other industries do this. And now were seeing the downward slope take effect with full-on censorship or outright cancellation.

The more inches you give them, the more miles they take.

>webcomics
>industry

Attached: 4E0DC840-421A-47D1-A095-D6135797CB31.jpg (295x234, 27.53K)

you can't really compare people to companies.

Attached: avx11-34.png (988x1500, 448.96K)

But Marvel characters are already horrible degenerates.

A weird counter-example: Homestuck 2 had a little "click to show trigger warnigns" box at the start of every chapter, which I thought was a smart and non-obtrusive way to do it, but then they removed them.

Gross. Muh Phoenix was great. Imagine feeling bad about it

Any furry that stops being a furry before making something with antrhopomorpic animals in it will make the final product 10000x times better, look at lackdaisy

I think adding warnings is fine; movies have had warnings for violence or sex or whatever in the form of "ratings" for years. Having a trigger warning in front of a specific page is clunky and awkward and kills the pacing, but the consensus is moving to "just have a page on your site with content warnings for the comic generally".

As for changing old comics, artists do that all the time for all sorts of reasons. Kiwi Blitz has been redrawing the old comics because the old comics had bad art, but it's also making minor dialogue changes and stuff as well (rewriting jokes to flow better, mostly). 8 Bit Theater went back and changed Thief's ninja outfit for the purposes of a joke. At some point, I want to go back and add an extra page to the first chapter of my current webcomic because there's a scene transition that's jarring and confusing.

Webcomics are weird because of the way they're made live. No one complains when a writer makes a second draft of their book, why are webcomics morally different?

Attached: Red.png (572x190, 93.73K)

There is nothing inherently wrong with censoring stuff that is dangerous and might incite a wrong way of thinking
Only facists and incels think so otherwise

>might incite a wrong way of thinking
I think old commie propaganda looks pretty cool, doesn't mean im going to start trying to seize the means of production.

It was but he probably didn't want people to freak out about the soap joke