Why do people not want to accept...?

...That Angelica pooped her pants in Rugrats Go Wild???

That’s why Susie is pouring lemonade on her in this picture, and why she’s not in her sailor dress.

Attached: E5500248-BEA7-4600-AF2B-A30754F9075A.jpg (367x367, 96K)

She’s even burning her clothes in this deleted scene!

Attached: 22A77886-9E8A-4508-89A2-DA67A030A7AD.jpg (700x453, 81.22K)

She’s by the fire.

Attached: AF2A6469-66D1-4E8A-9BC6-68D8D5140709.jpg (313x313, 32.55K)

this is a fetish isn't it?

What do you think?

No, but it is an obsession.

Why do these retarded millennial boys, who draw like they’re 6 years old in their 20’s, deny it so fervently??? Why are they in denial of the mere possibility of her pooping herself and wearing diapers at 3???

Why are they so convinced that she wore panties?

Attached: 8942848C-32C4-4202-86D3-F3EEBED09DEE.png (1136x640, 815.46K)

How does that look like a pair of panties?

Attached: F07C4ECD-B38D-44C2-859C-5DF18B62395B.jpg (720x480, 53.97K)

They’re nothing like this.

Attached: 43BEC082-C044-4570-A3A2-48F4CCB786A8.jpg (2000x2667, 499.66K)

I don’t believe those are panties. What are you gonna do about it???

What’s so great about her and/or Cheryl Chase that they refuse to believe or accept that she pooped herself at least twice???????

Why has she never shown off her “big girl panties,” if she’s such a potty-trained girl???

What evidence is there that she DIDN’T poop her pants, after eating like a hog and not using the bathroom for 24+ hours???

Here’s a clue: NONE!

Unless and until you can prove to me, with a picture from the movie, that the inside of her panties didn’t look like this (or worse), I shall go to my grave believing that she did...in the truest sense that a cartoon character can.

Attached: C3E0536D-9106-4F55-A0F7-C6A0BC1BEC3F.jpg (583x604, 94.01K)

I consider a skid mark to be a pooping accident, so how do we know she (or anyone else) didn’t poop their pants in that movie???????

I’ll bet most millennial guys defending her have underwear like that all the time. That’s why they want to deny it. But seriously, how do we know that any of them DIDN’T poop their pants after 24 hours on an island without toilets?

1.) How do we know that Tommy and Ph/L/Dil didn’t need new diapers?
2.) How do we know Kimi didn’t also?
3.) How do we know for sure Chuckie didn’t?
4.) What about Susie?
5.) How do we know Nigel didn’t skidmark his own when he hit his head?
6.) AND HOW CAN ANYONE DENY THAT ANGELICA DIDN’T get her comeuppance in this form???????

How can anyone say that Angelica didn’t get her comeuppance in this way?

How can you prove she didn’t turn her panties brown in all 3 movies???

Attached: 5D6AAB3F-3EDF-4D32-9F49-9D5319AB2A49.gif (640x360, 2.04M)

How do we know Nigel didn’t have underwear like this in the movie?

How can you say with certainty that anyone WASNT shittin their pants in this picture???????

Attached: 66D94325-022D-4B13-8308-445960BD0A70.jpg (1280x720, 326.53K)

Why would it bother people to know that Angelica pooped her pants in Rugrats Go Wild?

Why does that affect people in a negative way? I mean, it isn’t like she’s real or even relevant anymore, and her voice actress will be 62 on Christmas.

Could you please explain how and why a 3 y/o villain, in an outdated cartoon, pooping herself in a non-graphic way affects your life? Why would anyone want to deny it?

Why would anyone come to the defense of a character drawn like she has pigtails hanging off two horns in her head?

And why does this show attract retarded little man-children who draw like they’re 6?

Why do people still see this show through the eyes of the child they were at the time, despite male-pattern baldness. )I’m immune because I am female.)

Why do people still see this show through the eyes of the child they were at the time, despite male-pattern baldness? (I’m immune because I am female.)

The third movie is so wild it’s kinky!

Why does everyone deny how crude it is?

The show was crap.

The show was trash all the way from Tommy’s 1st BD through AGU. What is there to deny about that?