So uhh, is Pixar gonna pretend this thing never happened now like with The Good Dinosaur?
So uhh, is Pixar gonna pretend this thing never happened now like with The Good Dinosaur?
Huh? What is this?
If this is a Pixar movie then I at least heard of The Good Dinosaur, unlike this. What the fuck?
The only thing I remember about this is that unicorns are raccoons and that the goal was basically necromancy for noobs.
Haven't seen it.
It's not bad. They directly went after the "I have daddy and abandonment issues" demographic.
>tfw no chubby blue elf paizuri
The film was a mess in every sense of the word, that squandered its premise
Didn't you know ? It's the fourth first Disney movie to have a gay character!
The movie was mediocre at best. I'm glad COVID struck when it did to make it be a complete bomb.
I saw it once. Thought to myself how fucking generic and boring it was for Pixar and I dont think Ill ever see it again
It's better than Good Dinosaur
This made me mad because they could have done something really nice with the premise
Making a fantasy world as shit and boring as the real world is a huge waste of time
The concept of mystical creatures living a mundane life can be fun to play with, but it was handled poorly.
This.
And this.
Why does the fat one have a cast on his arm in this image? I don’t remember him wearing a cast at any point in the movie.
I enjoyed it solely because I like the sounds of Chris Pratt’s voice
The last scene in the movie was such a cuck feeling. There he was looking through a hole in a wall while his brother got to say bye to his dad and have a moment with him.
One can only hope.
I honestly got more out of The Good Dinosaur than I did Onward. They're both shit but Onward is almost completely devoid of memorable scenes, whereas The Good Dinosaur at least has its moments even if it was a mistake overall.
That was so fucking stupid, it was like
>emotionally satisfying ending? FUCK THAT! WE'RE PIXAR! WE HAVE TO BE DIFFERENT!
>make it so only ONE of them gets to see the dad and the other (who has never even met his dad) is stuck behind some conveniently placed rubble, that's deep as fuck
The point of the movie was that his father never did anything with him while his “father” so to speak was his bro who acted as a surrogate. His brother needed it more because he never got any closure with his father
I got it user, it wasnt subtle either they made it a whole fucking point to drill it in your fucking head for 3 minutes straight. Still doesnt stop it from being a cuck scenario.
Not him but that's a dumb point and one of the many reasons the movie is bad. Not only is Barley not a good role model or "surrogate", Ian getting to meet his father a grand total of one time in his life would not suddenly ruin his relationship with his brother. The whole situation is contrived.
This movie was really boring.
Nothing happened in almost 1 hour.
I did not care for the characters at all.
Oh alright, carry on, I thought this one’s one of those hating something for not understanding it. Feel free to shit on it all you want, gotta play Devil’s Advocate somedays
Being an insuferable faggot in defeat will not really change that you are the fucking obnoxious sack of shit. You aren't "a nice guy" because you admit to lose. Fuck off tourist.
Okay fair enough.
Calm down sperg.
Wuh?
>Ian getting to meet his father would not suddenly ruin his relationship with his brother.
That wasn’t why he did it. He knew it wouldn’t fuck up his relationship with his brother either way. But he still made a sacrifice for his brother just to be a good bro. He did it because he saw that Barley actually needed the closure. Barley had a relationship with his dad, and never got to say goodbye. Ian decided that he himself did not need any closure, because there was no relationship with his dad for him to close. Which, yeah, you probably already know because they hammered that shit home hard.
>The whole situation is contrived.
I completely agree with you here, though.
It just felt too convenient that that rubble fell in just the right way that only one of them could see their dad, and that was frustrating and distracting from what they were trying to do. I spent the entire film expecting the dad to only get like two minutes with having a top half, so I was ready for that. But the “only one of us can go see him” thing came right at the very end and felt like an emotional cockblock.
I think it’s solely because they didn’t want to hire an actor for the dad
post the elf mom x manticore ship
I think they wanted to prevent a Beauty and the Beast scenario where, no matter what they did, it was still gonna be disappointing. The dad could never live up to our expectations because we had spent an entire movie getting to know him as a pair of legs, so giving him a face and a voice would feel like they pulled in some stranger at the last minute and we’d hate it.
There are other reasons Ian could want to meet his dad besides closure. Like, just getting to talk to the man once. Sure it might hurt to only get that one time, but the alternative of not doing it and regretting it for the rest of your life would be much worse.
As we both agreed, the situation only exists because of a contrivance, but if a situation NEEDS a contrivance to exist, there's something inherently wrong with it.
>The Good Dinosaur
that need to be a 6 hrs film