Tfw there are literally 0 plot driven cartoons right now

>tfw there are literally 0 plot driven cartoons right now
What the fuck happened?

Attached: 1573753701192.gif (498x416, 88.51K)

Amphibia is coming back soon

I haven't actually watched that one. Is it good?

You all laughed at Steven Universe

No

Because it was bad.

That was before it's big build-up turned out to be a bunch of hippie overpacifistic bullshit that shat on what the show presented itself as. There's also the part where many people came to the realization that the worldbuilding is absolute dogshit that the crew simply made up as they went along.

They barely even had a plan at all. I can't believe I tolerated Sugar's bullshit for so long.

Attached: 195830481.jpg (1328x1488, 434K)

It's pretty good

Yes

That’s literally an episodic comedy
No just typical coomer worship

This is when a show is board-driven and lore-heavy at the same time.

Watch anime instead.

you decided that it was more important to scream about trannies than give anything a chance.

You ignored Primal and LOT3C

Based.

>plot driven
>cartoon
read a goddamn book you moron

Attached: 1593893431094.png (567x471, 324.54K)

Explain anime then

>watching anime for the plot
HAHAHAHAHA. BAKA!

Attached: 1560127865639.gif (500x281, 764.8K)

What's wrong with that? A lot of anime are serial because they follow serialized source material like manga or light novels.

>What the fuck happened?
Literally nothing. Serialized storytelling has never really been a major staple of western animation. Frankly, that's one of the big reasons I prefer it over western live action shows.

Also, Harley Quinn ended, and that was the only recent cartoon off the top of my head that was serialized.

Attached: tumblr_n1s4s3UgiO1qzk2upo2_400.gif (360x252, 543.43K)

No you're right but if a good story is what you're after you're better off with a good novel

Attached: 1593739077648.png (256x192, 27.47K)

>What the fuck happened?
Kids don't have attention spans anymore thanks to having too many options for entertainment at their fingertips with the advent of smart phones and tablets. So cartoons marketed toward kids have gotten shorter and there has been less focus on world building and continuity.

Sure, older folks might dig that kind of shit but older folks don't drive toy sales.

Why?

Yeah this.

Sometimes visual media enhances storytelling.

But you're right, that's honestly where I'm heading towards to now, especially since I have a job now and have had my priorities shifted.

Bojack Horseman ended and was the only one doing it.

Cartoons have been serial 99% of the time because 99% of normies don't take them seriously enough to think they're worth a plot.

Kipo

Wizards is coming soon, user

Because they are absolutely ubiquitous, do not devalue over time due to changes in visual fidelity and are generally following a plot.
Also you haven't read all the best ones already.

>Because they are absolutely ubiquitous
So what?

>do not devalue over time due to changes in visual fidelity
Why does that matter?

>and are generally following a plot.
As do most stories.

>Also you haven't read all the best ones already.
What's best is a matter of opinion.

Attached: 6ec.png (1266x688, 251.17K)

>do not devalue over time due to changes in visual fidelity and are generally following a plot.
This is true to a certain extent. Books can devalue over time due to dated ideas, vocabulary, etc, depending on who you're asking. Historians may find more value, but SJWs will hate them.

I still find old books enjoyable, though. The series I'm reading (though I haven't went back to it in a long time) was written in the colonial times.

Have you tried reading
>How to Starve With a Table Full of Food
By OP?

Truth

Attached: C65BDDA7-AEE8-40A1-9507-3D619ABDA727.png (360x450, 199.95K)

>So what?
You can read a hundred right now. No need to get access to a site or service.
>Why does that matter?
Because you can read an old book just the same as a new one.
>As do most stories.
And thus they fulfill OP's need for a plot-driven medium.
>What's best is a matter of opinion.
Doesn’t matter whose recommendations you follow, OP definitely has not read them all yet.

>Books can devalue over time due to dated ideas, vocabulary, etc, depending on who you're asking.
This is so true. I read Martian Time-Slip by Philip K Dick, and even though it's from the early 60's and it reads more like something from the 1890's by H. G. Wells, with people living on Mars like it was just Earth with lower gravity and thin air like a city at a high altitude, routinely referring to schizophrenia as autism, and everyone casually calling native martians "niggers".

Why are you trying so hard to suggest OP read a book

>You can read a hundred right now. No need to get access to a site or service.
That's exactly how I read books. Hunting down physical copies is a lot more work for basically no payoff.

>Doesn’t matter whose recommendations you follow, OP definitely has not read them all yet.
Nobody has, you goddamn retard. And like with everything else 80% or more of them are shit.

I do

I'm pretty sure that wasn't okay in the 60s, either.

>Why are you trying so hard to suggest OP read a book

Because he's an idiot and could do with some exposure to a medium for adults.